Prev: figuring out the active terminal
Next: bash unresponsive
From: Grant Edwards on 2 Apr 2010 16:36
On 2010-04-02, Todd <todd(a)invalid.com> wrote:
> On 04/02/2010 12:35 PM, Douglas Mayne wrote:
>
>> man smbclient
>
> But, can I do it without mounting the share. I want to do it on the
> fly.

Here's a novel idea:

Two people have told you you can use smbclient to do what you want,
so go read the documentation on smbclient.
From: Todd on 2 Apr 2010 16:52
On 04/02/2010 01:36 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2010-04-02, Todd<todd(a)invalid.com> wrote:
>> On 04/02/2010 12:35 PM, Douglas Mayne wrote:
>>
>>> man smbclient
>>
>> But, can I do it without mounting the share. I want to do it on the
>> fly.
>
> Here's a novel idea:
>
> Two people have told you you can use smbclient to do what you want,
> so go read the documentation on smbclient.

CIFS use to not work with smbclient. But it looks like it does now.
And it looks like the "get" command is what I need.

From: Harold Stevens on 2 Apr 2010 16:59
In <hp5kgs$rnv$1(a)reader1.panix.com> Grant Edwards:

[Snip...]

> so go read the documentation on smbclient

Or, obtain "the fly" from a registered breeder. Simple, no? :)

--
Regards, Weird (Harold Stevens) * IMPORTANT EMAIL INFO FOLLOWS *
Pardon any bogus email addresses (wookie) in place for spambots.
Really, it's (wyrd) at airmail, dotted with net. DO NOT SPAM IT.
I toss GoogleGroup (http://twovoyagers.com/improve-usenet.org/).
From: Grant Edwards on 2 Apr 2010 17:58
On 2010-04-02, Todd <todd(a)invalid.com> wrote:
> On 04/02/2010 01:36 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2010-04-02, Todd<todd(a)invalid.com> wrote:
>>> On 04/02/2010 12:35 PM, Douglas Mayne wrote:
>>>
>>>> man smbclient
>>>
>>> But, can I do it without mounting the share. I want to do it on the
>>> fly.
>>
>> Here's a novel idea:
>>
>> Two people have told you you can use smbclient to do what you want,
>> so go read the documentation on smbclient.
>
> CIFS use to not work with smbclient.

Isn't CIFS just Microsoft's latest re-branding of the SMB protocol?

--
Grant




From: Todd on 2 Apr 2010 18:15
On 04/02/2010 02:58 PM, Grant Edwards wrote:

> Isn't CIFS just Microsoft's latest re-branding of the SMB protocol?

Probably. I have had to use "mount -t cifs" for years now. The
day M$ makes something that does not suck, will be the day they
start making vacuum cleaners.

-T



First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
Prev: figuring out the active terminal
Next: bash unresponsive