Prev: 'The data file Personal Folders' was not closed properly'
Next: OL 2003: error 0x800408FC - 'The server name you entered can not be found on the network'
From: Christian Goeller on 4 Jul 2007 05:11 Bob Provencher, you wrote on Tue, 3 Jul 2007 21:38:07 -0400: >> Do I understand correctly that everything is ok? > Yes Fine :-). -- Best Regards Christian Goeller http://www.outlookfaq.net
From: Bob Provencher on 4 Jul 2007 10:59 Actually, the solution was not to create a new profile, if you followed the thread you'd have know that. I've been debugging software sinec the early 80's and been on usenet since the 90's so I know what information is necessary and what is a good post and what is an obnoxious response. I got some good responses that answered my question very quickly from the complete informaiton I gave, and one obnoxious one asking for irrelevant information. Hopefully that individual is not planning on making a career out of tech support. "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" <russval(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:uevvFCbvHHA.3356(a)TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... > OK. I see. Sorry. Yes, I'll ask for the requisite information more > politely next time. Sometimes it gets tiring when the initial post is as > vague and uninformative as yours was because we then have to take a lot of > time to drill down into the problem. This site is worth a look when you > use peer-to-peer newsgroups for help: > http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
From: Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] on 4 Jul 2007 22:37
No risk of that. You really haven't been paying attention. I have no plans for a career in tech support. However, when you need a stent in your LAD or a heart transplant, you will be using me or one of my colleagues. -- Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook] "Bob Provencher" <bob(a)nospam.org> wrote in message news:I-mdnZgHcMX5KBbbnZ2dnUVZ_u2mnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > Actually, the solution was not to create a new profile, if you followed > the thread you'd have know that. > > I've been debugging software sinec the early 80's and been on usenet since > the 90's so I know what information is necessary and what is a good post > and what is an obnoxious response. > > I got some good responses that answered my question very quickly from the > complete informaiton I gave, and one obnoxious one asking for irrelevant > information. > > Hopefully that individual is not planning on making a career out of tech > support. > > "Russ Valentine [MVP-Outlook]" <russval(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > news:uevvFCbvHHA.3356(a)TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl... >> OK. I see. Sorry. Yes, I'll ask for the requisite information more >> politely next time. Sometimes it gets tiring when the initial post is as >> vague and uninformative as yours was because we then have to take a lot >> of time to drill down into the problem. This site is worth a look when >> you use peer-to-peer newsgroups for help: >> http://dts-l.org/goodpost.htm > > |