Canon and Panasonic: updated models
in [Digital Cameras]
|
From: George Kerby on 29 May 2010 10:24 On 5/28/10 9:20 AM, in article k7kvv5df6nj4mf5bnmsvb07t0vv2pq4ml5(a)4ax.com, "John Navas" <jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2010 09:05:00 -0400, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote in > <tpfvv5tn0cnukom6neniqc14oa1cta5e1b(a)4ax.com>: > >> Yes, I know the issue and I know Navas' tactics very well. He makes >> ridiculous claims and never provides any proof to back them. I'll pass >> on the banter this time. It's tiring and he's beginning to really bore >> me. > > 'Those who have evidence will present their evidence, > whereas those who do not have evidence will attack the man.' "Cleverness is not wisdom." --Euripides NavAss, you have neither...
From: George Kerby on 29 May 2010 10:28 On 5/28/10 10:02 AM, in article vmmvv59nc38t6tpe7cn8e8kir1t3htp9r1(a)4ax.com, "John Navas" <jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:59:11 -0700, SMS <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> > wrote in <4bffda4b$0$1600$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net>: > >> Good choice. Consider trying CHDK on it. The SX1 already has many of the >> features that CHDK provides to the lower end Canon models, but there's >> still some useful stuff in there. If you have any questions on CHDK let >> me know. I wrote a lot of documentation for it and I'm very familiar >> with it. > > Only in your dreams. "Dreams are today's answers to tomorrow's questions." --Edgar Cayce The question here is: "When are you going to go away, NavAss?"
From: George Kerby on 29 May 2010 10:29 On 5/28/10 11:50 AM, in article 80tvv55kb4q74ie5gf7v2lrvjpvp7b1jjv(a)4ax.com, "Bowser" <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:17:56 -0700, John Navas > <jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, 28 May 2010 09:02:59 -0400, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote in >> <6mfvv5d0lqkk7q9b2tf9ed9niprg7t1jgd(a)4ax.com>: >> >>> On Thu, 27 May 2010 16:45:06 -0700, John Navas >>> <jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Thu, 27 May 2010 19:22:29 -0400, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote in >>>> <2kvtv5tpsrnqlso7hg4q3aalcrvq26d593(a)4ax.com>: >> >>>>> Uh, not really. I own an FZ35 and while I love it, it's clearly not in >>>>> the same league as any DSLR with regards to image quality or AF speed. >>>>> Not to say it's bad; it's quite good. But nowhere near a DSLR. >>>> >>>> Uh, really. I own an FZ28, which is excellent, and the FZ35 I borrowed >>>> for a day was ever better. Autofocus speed is excellent *if* you >>>> configure the cameras properly. Image quality likewise. >>>> I routinely get better shots (in all respects) than those shooting the >>>> same subjects with dSLR cameras. Perhaps you need more practice with >>>> the FZ35. >>> >>> Nah, it's configured just fine. >> >> Apparently not. >> >>> Every time we go down this road I ask >>> you to prove what you say, we banter, and you never provide proof. >>> Some other time, John. >> >> I've provided more than adequate proof repeatedly (again today), but you >> are still entitled to your opinion, no matter how unfounded. > > OK, just this once: > > You claim that the Panny FZ35 AF is as fast as a DSLR. Prove it. Not > your opinion, not a statement that "it's fast" but real proof. Some > third party testing that shows it's as fast as, say, my Canon 5D II. > > When you've conquered that one, post a few samples shot at ISO 3200 > that match the 5D II. > > We're all waiting. Don't hold your breath...
From: George Kerby on 29 May 2010 10:31 On 5/28/10 12:23 PM, in article f0vvv5tm6pks2o2thjcnvir8favi4q5bf4(a)4ax.com, "John Navas" <jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:51:23 -0400, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote in > <v3tvv5p7fqollhg1pb8s34vjgr67haom0s(a)4ax.com>: > >> On Fri, 28 May 2010 07:20:06 -0700, John Navas >> <jnspam1(a)navasgroup.com> wrote: >> >>> On Fri, 28 May 2010 09:05:00 -0400, Bowser <Canon(a)Nikon.Panny> wrote in >>> <tpfvv5tn0cnukom6neniqc14oa1cta5e1b(a)4ax.com>: >>> >>>> Yes, I know the issue and I know Navas' tactics very well. He makes >>>> ridiculous claims and never provides any proof to back them. I'll pass >>>> on the banter this time. It's tiring and he's beginning to really bore >>>> me. >>> >>> 'Those who have evidence will present their evidence, >>> whereas those who do not have evidence will attack the man.' >> >> And your evidence is....where? > > "Google is your friend." WEAK! But typical NavAss...
From: George Kerby on 29 May 2010 10:38
On 5/28/10 2:14 PM, in article 5b5006l7i9gd4ltvkara5rcat041ngvm21(a)4ax.com, "LOL!" <lol(a)lol.org> wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2010 18:18:31 GMT, "Dudley Hanks" > <dhanks(a)blind-apertures.ca> wrote: > >> >> "SMS" <scharf.steven(a)geemail.com> wrote in message >> news:4bffdaf5$0$1600$742ec2ed(a)news.sonic.net... >>> On 28/05/10 6:05 AM, Bowser wrote: >>> >>>> Yes, I know the issue and I know Navas' tactics very well. He makes >>>> ridiculous claims and never provides any proof to back them. I'll pass >>>> on the banter this time. It's tiring and he's beginning to really bore >>>> me. >>> >>> I kill-filed him years ago. His lack of knowledge is not limited just to >>> digital cameras, but extends to other fields as well. It's amusing at >>> first, then as you stated, it gets boring. >> >> He's a member in good standing of my kill file as well... >> >> The sad thing about John is that, as has been previously pointed out, his >> comments seem more intended to justify his purchase than to explore the art >> / science of picture taking. >> >> As a recent purchaser of a superzoom, I like it, and I believe it can >> produce better pics than my Rebel XSi in a limited number of situations, but >> the overall nod has to go to the DSLR because of the larger sensor and lens >> interchangeability. >> > > And you would know this because .... > > You actually see the images you take? > > News Flash: Blind Photographer hired by DPReview to do all their latest > camera and lens reviews. Word has it that he's even better than their > present camera reviewers. (Actually, there wouldn't be much difference.) > > LOL! > Oh lookie! The Troll has morphed! Come over here, let me give you a lye enema for being such a BAD BOY! |