From: badgolferman on 22 Oct 2009 08:06 hummingbird, 10/22/2009,5:31:36 AM, wrote: > 'No Spam' wrote thus: > > >In article <4adfd08c.1704375(a)us.Usenet-News.net> > > dingdongdaddy(a)dumas.com (Hutton Conyers) wrote: > > > > > Cleanup! by stevengould.org is NAGWARE not freeware. A nice > > > utility but I don't like being nagged for donations for what I > > > thought was freeware by a poster here. I'll go back to CCleaner. > > > > > > > It only asks you once, and the author is entitled to that. > > > > Also, ccleaner doesn't clean ALL the user profiles on Windows, > > something that some of us with multiple users on the same computer > > find very useful. > > CCleaner can clean virtually anything you want it to. It's just a > matter of adding entries into the winapp.ini and/or winapp2.ini. > Although for reg entries this would be a tad time consuming. > > appwin.ini comes pre-configured but can be edited by the user > and appwin2.ini can be created by the user. > > CCleaner reads them both when it runs. > I added lots of misc entries to clean out old log files etc etc. Please provide some sample entries for cleaning multiple user's profiles.
From: occam on 22 Oct 2009 09:05 Hutton Conyers wrote: > Cleanup! by stevengould.org is NAGWARE not freeware. A nice utility > but I don't like being nagged for donations for what I thought was > freeware by a poster here. I'll go back to CCleaner. > > > In addition to that shortcoming (excusable) the user experience is appaling! - does it show what it is about to 'clean'? NO - does it offer to save (for recovery) all the to-be-deleted entries? NO To cap it all, it makes a noise like a broken down washing machine (while deleting) which makes the experience very jarring. (OK, this can be switched off somewhere.)
From: Johnw on 22 Oct 2009 09:14 Hutton Conyers submitted this idea : > Cleanup! by stevengould.org is NAGWARE not freeware. A nice utility > but I don't like being nagged for donations for what I thought was > freeware by a poster here. I'll go back to CCleaner. CCleaner & Users, you can use > Run As. How to enable and use the "Run As" command when running programs in Windows http://support.microsoft.com/kb/294676 Use 'Run As' To Execute Programs As Administrator http://netsecurity.about.com/od/quicktips/qt/qt_run_as.htm
From: Johnw on 22 Oct 2009 09:33 hummingbird expressed precisely : > See JohnW's post about running a program with Administrator rights > :-) I'd forgotten that! There may also be a NirSoft proggy to do > it with even greater aplomb :-) There is this one HB. ShellRunAs http://www.downloadsquad.com/2008/02/28/shellrunas-v1-0-add-run-as-different-user-option-to-right-cli/ http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/cc300361.aspx The command-line Runas utility is handy for launching programs under different accounts, but it's not convenient if you're a heavy Explorer user. ShellRunas provides functionality similar to that of Runas to launch programs as a different user via a convenient shell context-menu entry.
From: FredW on 22 Oct 2009 11:12 On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:45:19 +0800, Johnw <jmatt(a)webace.com.au> wrote: >Thore wrote on 22/10/2009 : >> On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 03:27:40 GMT, dingdongdaddy(a)dumas.com (Hutton >> Conyers) wrote: >> >>> Cleanup! by stevengould.org is NAGWARE not freeware. A nice utility >>> but I don't like being nagged for donations for what I thought was >>> freeware by a poster here. I'll go back to CCleaner. >>> >> Or you can use Cleanup! ver 4.0 >> >> No nags.. >> >> I can't see any difference in 4.0 and 4.52 (other than the nags in 4.52) > >What's New in CleanUp! 4.5 > >http://www.stevengould.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogcategory&id=80&Itemid=254 New, new, .............. ? The "new" version dates from 2006. I used this many years on my WindowsXP. (and what nagscreen?) Cleanup shows what will be deleted. It was always very reliable and did what I expected. (it is better than CCleaner.) But it does not work on my Vista 64-bit, so I have to use CCleaner for now. :-( -- Fred W. (NL)
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: REQ: Virtual Device Audio Driver (Soundcard) Next: codec pack recommendation? |