From: FredW on 23 Oct 2009 06:19 On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:56:59 +0200, occam <occam(a)127.0.0.1> wrote: >FredW wrote: > >> (it is better than CCleaner.) > >Your personal ... I assume everybody here gives her/his personal opinion. Don't you? -- Fred W. (NL)
From: FredW on 23 Oct 2009 06:20 On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:05:18 +0200, occam <occam(a)127.0.0.1> wrote: >Hutton Conyers wrote: >> Cleanup! by stevengould.org is NAGWARE not freeware. A nice utility >> but I don't like being nagged for donations for what I thought was >> freeware by a poster here. I'll go back to CCleaner. > >To cap it all, it makes a noise like a broken down washing machine >(while deleting) which makes the experience very jarring. (OK, this can >be switched off somewhere.) I liked the sound. :-)) -- Fred W. (NL)
From: Johnw on 23 Oct 2009 21:28 hummingbird has brought this to us : >> Vit Registry Fix Free Edition >> http://www.softpedia.com/get/Tweak/Registry-Tweak/Vit-Registry-Fix.shtml >> http://www.softpedia.com/progScreenshots/Vit-Registry-Fix-Screenshot-119237.html >> http://www.vitsoft.org.ua/vit-registry-fix-free.htm >> XP / Vista / XP X64 / Vista64 / 7. > > Thanks John, I'll take a look at VIT. When I try a new cleaner HB, I run the others I have, then the new cleaner. Here are some screenshots of how I use VIT. http://img10.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=vit5.jpg
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: REQ: Virtual Device Audio Driver (Soundcard) Next: codec pack recommendation? |