Prev: Can light be described as infinitesimal distortions of spacetime?
Next: * Hates US * admits his homosexuality while committing EPIC FAIL in futile attempt to support his LYING CLAIM about PNAC, which of course never said anything remotely suggesting it "wanted" the 9/11 attacks
From: Arthur Brain on 17 Jul 2010 21:39
On Jul 17, 12:22 pm, "Peter Webb"
<webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
> And you still don't feel the need to be in the least bit sceptical of
> the preconceived notions born from your ignorance of the subject?
>
> ____________________________________
>
> Ummm... I'm the skeptical one. Perhaps because I remember the great global
> cooling scare of the the 1970s.

As a believer in it, you will no doubt be horrified to learn that the
"cooling scare of the the 1970s" was cooked up by denialists in 2006?

Yet another scepticism failure on your part.
From: Arthur Brain on 18 Jul 2010 17:44
On Jul 18, 7:49 pm, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> "Arthur Brainless" <arthur.brain.l...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Was that intended as proof that Denialists are kooks and
> loons, or was that accidental?
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> ... ahahahaha.. Arti-pooh, listen. The fact that you did
> ask this question shows that you are a brainless class 3
> enviro. So let me repost it for your benefit:

<SNIP>

Nah, we got it the frirst time: like all the other deniers, you are a
Class 'A' fruitloop.
From: Peter Webb on 19 Jul 2010 04:44

"Arthur Brain" <arthur.brain.haha(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:14a12e1c-6fa5-4cde-b243-b9744d00449e(a)x24g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 17, 12:22 pm, "Peter Webb"
<webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
> And you still don't feel the need to be in the least bit sceptical of
> the preconceived notions born from your ignorance of the subject?
>
> ____________________________________
>
> Ummm... I'm the skeptical one. Perhaps because I remember the great global
> cooling scare of the the 1970s.

As a believer in it, you will no doubt be horrified to learn that the
"cooling scare of the the 1970s" was cooked up by denialists in 2006?

Yet another scepticism failure on your part.

__________________________________________

http://www.denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdf

You obviously weren't alive back then. It was a cover story in both Time and
Newsweek. Or maybe you think documents such as the above are forgeries?

I note that snipped the question I asked, and didn't answer it.

If you were alive and an adult in 1975, did you believe the "almost
unanimous" view of climate scientists of the time? If not, would you have
believed?


From: Arthur Brain on 21 Jul 2010 05:21
On Jul 19, 10:41 am, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote:
> ------ ahahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahahaha... -------
> "Arthur Brainless" <arthur.brain.l...(a)gmail.com> being a
> class 3 enviro, is damaged goods, and slow on the uptake
> like all Little Green Idiots are, and obviously a Denier, sincehe wrote: "Nah, we got it the frirst time"
>
> hanson wrote:

<SNIP>

CUCK-OO!

Like most deniers - you're a fruitloop.
From: Arthur Brain on 21 Jul 2010 05:25
On Jul 19, 6:44 pm, "Peter Webb"
<webbfam...(a)DIESPAMDIEoptusnet.com.au> wrote:
> "Arthur Brain" <arthur.brain.h...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:14a12e1c-6fa5-4cde-b243-b9744d00449e(a)x24g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> On Jul 17, 12:22 pm, "Peter Webb"

___________________________________
>
> > Ummm... I'm the skeptical one. Perhaps because I remember the great global
> > cooling scare of the the 1970s.
>
> As a believer in it, you will no doubt be horrified to learn that the
> "cooling scare of the the 1970s" was cooked up by denialists in 2006?
>
> Yet another scepticism failure on your part.
>
> __________________________________________
>
> http://www.denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdf
>
> You obviously weren't alive back then. It was a cover story in both Time and
> Newsweek.

Sorry - "Time and Newsweek"?

Which scientific organisations do they represent, precisely?
And how do two (2) journalists' stories stack up against the 73 peer-
reviewed scientific papers about global warming which were published
in the 1970s?
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Can light be described as infinitesimal distortions of spacetime?
Next: * Hates US * admits his homosexuality while committing EPIC FAIL in futile attempt to support his LYING CLAIM about PNAC, which of course never said anything remotely suggesting it "wanted" the 9/11 attacks