From: Richard Blaine on
Any quick way/shortcut to close five or six currently running apps under
10.6.2 without having to manually shut down each one?
From: nospam on
In article <ho2q0j$lbt$1(a)news.albasani.net>, Richard Blaine
<rick(a)nospam.biz> wrote:

> Any quick way/shortcut to close five or six currently running apps under
> 10.6.2 without having to manually shut down each one?

cmd-tab and press q when the desired app is selected. repeat until all
of the desired apps are quit.
From: Jolly Roger on
In article <ho2q0j$lbt$1(a)news.albasani.net>,
Richard Blaine <rick(a)nospam.biz> wrote:

> Any quick way/shortcut to close five or six currently running apps under
> 10.6.2 without having to manually shut down each one?

You could write a simple Applescript to do it.

--
Send responses to the relevant news group rather than email to me.
E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my very hungry SPAM
filter. Due to Google's refusal to prevent spammers from posting
messages through their servers, I often ignore posts from Google
Groups. Use a real news client if you want me to see your posts.

JR
From: OP on

"nospam" <nospam(a)nospam.invalid> wrote in message
news:200320100843183496%nospam(a)nospam.invalid...
> In article <ho2q0j$lbt$1(a)news.albasani.net>, Richard Blaine
> <rick(a)nospam.biz> wrote:
>
>> Any quick way/shortcut to close five or six currently running apps under
>> 10.6.2 without having to manually shut down each one?
>
> cmd-tab and press q when the desired app is selected. repeat until all
> of the desired apps are quit.

So the answer is, "No".


From: OP on

"Jolly Roger" <jollyroger(a)pobox.com> wrote in message
news:jollyroger-99A990.10533820032010(a)news.individual.net...
> In article <ho2q0j$lbt$1(a)news.albasani.net>,
> Richard Blaine <rick(a)nospam.biz> wrote:
>
>> Any quick way/shortcut to close five or six currently running apps under
>> 10.6.2 without having to manually shut down each one?
>
> You could write a simple Applescript to do it.

Maybe he's not a programmer. So your answer should have been, "No".