From: mjt on 3 Jul 2010 13:17 On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 17:08:57 +0000 (UTC) gazelle(a)shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) wrote: > In article <87k4pcr0vj.fsf(a)thumper.dhh.gt.org>, > John Hasler <jhasler(a)newsguy.com> wrote: > >mjt writes: > >> You'd be surprised how many people (home users/hobbyists) want to > >> change to something newer (like going from ext3->4) just because > >> it's cooler or the latest thing, not because it offers any > >> technical advantages... > > > >Actually it's often that they assume that because it is newer it must > >have advantages that matter to them even though they have no idea > >what they might be. > > Granted, this is mainstream management-think. That you must always > "upgrade" to the latest, regardless of whether or not there is any > real advantage. It is a "You just gotta do it - in order to keep up > with everything else that is going on." Agreed to both John and Kenny. For me, it's what I do for a living ... the "consultant" thing. As a knee-jerk reaction, I always ask "why" ... you see it more in the "personal" world (i.e. hobbyist), but I also see it [more than I like to] in the corporate world ... it's always the techno-weenie who wants the latest thing and talks management into the newest gizmo. -- Economists can certainly disappoint you. One said that the economy would turn up by the last quarter. Well, I'm down to mine and it hasn't. - Robert Orben <<< Remove YOURSHOES to email me >>>
From: mjt on 3 Jul 2010 13:22 On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 12:42:28 -0400 despen(a)verizon.net wrote: > Well don't let FACTS get in the way of a good rant: > > http://www.cyberciti.biz/tips/linux-convert-ext3-to-ext4-file-system.html > > A few seconds in Google turned up the above link which is as simple as > issuing a couple of commands. > > I didn't bother to do more searches, for all I know one of the built > in GUI tools may do the conversion too. You didn't address the OP's original request. It's not that they don't know how to do the conversion, but their concern is whether existing files are treated as "true" ext4 (extents) files after the conversion. They aren't - there is no "conversion in place" that happens, unless you off-load the files and then copy them back into the filesystem. Even if you run a defrag utility, it won't reconstitute a file into an ext4 entry if it's not considered for de-fragmentation. -- "I can't complain, but sometimes I still do." - Joe Walsh <<< Remove YOURSHOES to email me >>>
From: mjt on 3 Jul 2010 13:28 On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 18:17:03 +0100 The Natural Philosopher <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > > Now, now. Be nice. All I'm saying is that an in-place convert > > utility is a good thing to have. > > No, its a nice thing to have. In Linux. > > It is of course mandatory in Windows, as all that crappy FAT stuff > cant easily be changed without a tool to do it for you by the > average brainless windows user. An "average brainless windows user" (aren't all Windows users brainless?) won't know what FAT and NTFS are. -- "The porcupine with the sharpest quills gets stuck on a tree more often." <<< Remove YOURSHOES to email me >>>
From: Kenny McCormack on 3 Jul 2010 13:35 In article <i0nraf$eq8$2(a)news.albasani.net>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: .... >It is of course mandatory in Windows, as all that crappy FAT stuff cant >easily be changed without a tool to do it for you by the average >brainless windows user. You appear to have some, er, issues, Sir. Do you have good insurance? Does it cover psychiatric care? -- Just for a change of pace, this sig is *not* an obscure reference to comp.lang.c...
From: The Natural Philosopher on 3 Jul 2010 13:51
Kenny McCormack wrote: > In article <i0nraf$eq8$2(a)news.albasani.net>, > The Natural Philosopher <tnp(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > ... >> It is of course mandatory in Windows, as all that crappy FAT stuff cant >> easily be changed without a tool to do it for you by the average >> brainless windows user. > > You appear to have some, er, issues, Sir. Do you have good insurance? > Does it cover psychiatric care? > Moi? Not at all. Juts too many years in IT. Nothing a few minutes using some of this lovely Linux software wont cure tho, |