Cosmology, the range of light, and the scientific method
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 400.7: Search for Equations of form y = 2x + z, SUNY Buffalo New York USA Results
Next: speed of light out of pure math the pseudosphere as time and sphere as distance Chapt 19 #216; ATOM TOTALITY
From: eric gisse on 10 Jul 2010 16:43 Michael Helland wrote: [...] >> >> Models that do not feature expansion are wroooong. > > True. > > But my model, like the Big Bang, and unlike Tired Light, features the > expansion of time. Like I said, you simply don't know what you are talking about. There is no 'expansion of time' in either model. Find a new hobby, Mike. You didn't make it even 1 day without showing how completely clueless you are. [snip rest, unread]
From: Michael Helland on 10 Jul 2010 16:50 On Jul 10, 1:43 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Michael Helland wrote: > > [...] > > > > >> Models that do not feature expansion are wroooong. > > > True. > > > But my model, like the Big Bang, and unlike Tired Light, features the > > expansion of time. > > Like I said, you simply don't know what you are talking about. There is no > 'expansion of time' in either model. This demonstrates the "expansion of time" effect: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0JTD3FkWjc Big Bang: expansion of space and time v=c-Ht: expansion of time tired light: nothing > Find a new hobby, Mike. You didn't make it even 1 day without showing how > completely clueless you are. > > [snip rest, unread]
From: eric gisse on 10 Jul 2010 18:43 Michael Helland wrote: > On Jul 10, 1:43 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Michael Helland wrote: >> >> [...] >> >> >> >> >> Models that do not feature expansion are wroooong. >> >> > True. >> >> > But my model, like the Big Bang, and unlike Tired Light, features the >> > expansion of time. >> >> Like I said, you simply don't know what you are talking about. There is >> no 'expansion of time' in either model. > > > This demonstrates the "expansion of time" effect: > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0JTD3FkWjc Learn how science is communicated. Hint: not through youtube. > > Big Bang: expansion of space and time Wrong and stupid. ds^2 = -dt^2 + a(t)[dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2]. No expansion of time. > v=c-Ht: expansion of time Wrong and stupid again. You simply say light slows down, without having any theory past that. > tired light: nothing Ah, the hat trick of 'wrong and stupid'. Tired light simply says light loses energy as it travels. No expansion of anything, by explicit assumption. Unskilled and unaware of it, Mike. Find a new hobby. > > > > > >> Find a new hobby, Mike. You didn't make it even 1 day without showing how >> completely clueless you are. >> >> [snip rest, unread]
From: Michael Helland on 10 Jul 2010 18:53 On Jul 10, 3:43 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Michael Helland wrote: > > On Jul 10, 1:43 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Michael Helland wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> >> Models that do not feature expansion are wroooong. > > >> > True. > > >> > But my model, like the Big Bang, and unlike Tired Light, features the > >> > expansion of time. > > >> Like I said, you simply don't know what you are talking about. There is > >> no 'expansion of time' in either model. > > > This demonstrates the "expansion of time" effect: > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0JTD3FkWjc > > Learn how science is communicated. Hint: not through youtube. I created a mathematical model, and provided you the code, and in the past have even provided you an environment which will execute the code. So did you run it? I doubt it. To make things even easier, I showed you a video that shows the code running. Did you like it? Apparently not. Eric, I don't think I have as big a problem communicating science as you think. Maybe the problem is that you're just too eager to defend the established theories. Fine with me, it takes all types. You really should chill out a little bit more and not take this all so personally. > > Big Bang: expansion of space and time > > Wrong and stupid. > > ds^2 = -dt^2 + a(t)[dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2]. No expansion of time. The mathematics and graph I have provided do not a lie. As the distance light travels increases, so does the duration of its travels. > > v=c-Ht: expansion of time > > Wrong and stupid again. > > You simply say light slows down, without having any theory past that. I'm simply explaining empirically established Exhibit A: Hubble redshift. > > tired light: nothing > > Ah, the hat trick of 'wrong and stupid'. > > Tired light simply says light loses energy as it travels. Agreed. It says nothing about distances expanding or light slowing down, which means neither duration nor distance increases. > No expansion of > anything, by explicit assumption. > > Unskilled and unaware of it, Mike. Find a new hobby. In my model, the duration increases. The mathematics don't lie. I've provided a graph at the end of the video for you to examine if you'd like to skip the model and look at its results. > >> Find a new hobby, Mike. You didn't make it even 1 day without showing how > >> completely clueless you are. > > >> [snip rest, unread]
From: Michael Helland on 11 Jul 2010 04:18
On Jul 10, 10:02 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > I will never look. Understood. |