Prev: BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL
Next: Inconsistency of Special Relativity and Doppler Effect Chapt 8 #143; ATOM TOTALITY
From: eric gisse on 9 Jun 2010 21:06 Pol Lux wrote: > On Jun 7, 1:30 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Pollux wrote: >> > I'm looking for examples of simple contravariant and covariant >> > quantities in physics. I understand that position is contravariant, and >> > a gradient covariant (please correct if I'm mistaken). Any other >> > quantities? How about mixed contravariant/covariant quantities? What >> > would be the simplest example? >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Pollux >> >> > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net --- >> >> Vector - covariant. >> Vector in frequency domain [Fourier transform] - contravariant. >> Riemann tensor R^a_bcd - mixed >> T^a_a [trace of tensor] - mixed. > > OK. So for a very trivial example, the slope of a mountain path, in > units of "meters per meters" would be covariant, because 10 m/m go to > 10000 km/km in "kilometers per kilometers" (slope is also a gradient, > right?). Gradient is contravariant. > > Can I ask why we bother with mixed tensors? Because. That's why. > You can use the metric to > change mixed tensors to all contravariant or all covariant tensors, > right? Is it easier to work with mixed tensors? No, it is equally easy. It is also required usually. > > Pollux
From: Pol Lux on 9 Jun 2010 21:41 On Jun 9, 6:06 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Pol Lux wrote: > > On Jun 7, 1:30 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Pollux wrote: > >> > I'm looking for examples of simple contravariant and covariant > >> > quantities in physics. I understand that position is contravariant, and > >> > a gradient covariant (please correct if I'm mistaken). Any other > >> > quantities? How about mixed contravariant/covariant quantities? What > >> > would be the simplest example? > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Pollux > > >> > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net --- > > >> Vector - covariant. > >> Vector in frequency domain [Fourier transform] - contravariant. > >> Riemann tensor R^a_bcd - mixed > >> T^a_a [trace of tensor] - mixed. > > > OK. So for a very trivial example, the slope of a mountain path, in > > units of "meters per meters" would be covariant, because 10 m/m go to > > 10000 km/km in "kilometers per kilometers" (slope is also a gradient, > > right?). > > Gradient is contravariant. You think so? > > Can I ask why we bother with mixed tensors? > > Because. That's why. Very smart. > > You can use the metric to > > change mixed tensors to all contravariant or all covariant tensors, > > right? Is it easier to work with mixed tensors? > > No, it is equally easy. It is also required usually. Required? Pollux
From: eric gisse on 10 Jun 2010 02:47 Pol Lux wrote: > On Jun 9, 6:06 pm, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Pol Lux wrote: >> > On Jun 7, 1:30 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Pollux wrote: >> >> > I'm looking for examples of simple contravariant and covariant >> >> > quantities in physics. I understand that position is contravariant, >> >> > and a gradient covariant (please correct if I'm mistaken). Any other >> >> > quantities? How about mixed contravariant/covariant quantities? What >> >> > would be the simplest example? >> >> >> > Thanks, >> >> >> > Pollux >> >> >> > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net >> >> > --- >> >> >> Vector - covariant. >> >> Vector in frequency domain [Fourier transform] - contravariant. >> >> Riemann tensor R^a_bcd - mixed >> >> T^a_a [trace of tensor] - mixed. >> >> > OK. So for a very trivial example, the slope of a mountain path, in >> > units of "meters per meters" would be covariant, because 10 m/m go to >> > 10000 km/km in "kilometers per kilometers" (slope is also a gradient, >> > right?). >> >> Gradient is contravariant. > You think so? I think one-forms are contravariant. > >> > Can I ask why we bother with mixed tensors? >> >> Because. That's why. > Very smart. What do you expect? You are asking the tensorial equivalent of 'why do we bother with vectors'? They are a handy mathematical construct. > >> > You can use the metric to >> > change mixed tensors to all contravariant or all covariant tensors, >> > right? Is it easier to work with mixed tensors? >> >> No, it is equally easy. It is also required usually. > Required? Because the input index can't always be arbitrary? Besides, raise/lower the index with the metric - learn index gymnastics. It is way simpler than you think. > > Pollux
From: eric gisse on 10 Jun 2010 03:02 Rock Brentwood wrote: > Pollux wrote: >> I'm looking for examples of simple contravariant and covariant >> quantities in physics. > > On Jun 7, 3:30 am, eric gisse <jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> Vector - covariant. >> Vector in frequency domain [Fourier transform] - contravariant. > > Ignoring the untutored replies from people self-confident in their > ignorance [...] If you think its' wrong, say its' wrong. I'm a grownup. The passive aggressive routine is sad.
From: Pollux on 10 Jun 2010 09:31 (6/10/10 12:02 AM), eric gisse wrote: > Rock Brentwood wrote: > >> Pollux wrote: >>> I'm looking for examples of simple contravariant and covariant >>> quantities in physics. >> >> On Jun 7, 3:30 am, eric gisse<jowr.pi.nos...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >>> Vector - covariant. >>> Vector in frequency domain [Fourier transform] - contravariant. >> >> Ignoring the untutored replies from people self-confident in their >> ignorance [...] > > If you think its' wrong, say its' wrong. I'm a grownup. > > The passive aggressive routine is sad. Eric, look up contravariant/covariant on wikipedia. Pollux --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: BIOLOGY IN A NUT SHELL Next: Inconsistency of Special Relativity and Doppler Effect Chapt 8 #143; ATOM TOTALITY |