Prev: voltage divider calcs
Next: TVS used as a zener
From: Archimedes' Lever on 27 Apr 2010 06:37
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:21:41 -0700 (PDT), Greegor <greegor47(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>Cox in Oceanside California must be glad.


Before or after the class action suit?
From: Archimedes' Lever on 27 Apr 2010 06:40
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 09:33:11 -0700, Jim Thompson
<To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-Icon(a)On-My-Web-Site.com> wrote:

>I do know they're building a fiber core, so it could get faster.
>
>>

Retard, You are already on fiber or you would not be getting those
speeds.

It is called "fiber-to-the-pole".

Yes, idiot, it is even called that if your utility is underground.
Then, it is "fiber-to-the-box" (or taps).

Everyone is STILL copper into the house. That will not change for a
long time. The infrastructure is too expensive to change out
unnecessarily any time soon.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 27 Apr 2010 06:45
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:11:09 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 06:45:47 -0700, AtTheEndofMyRope
><AtTheEndofMyRope(a)AtTheEndofMyRope.org> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:46:39 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>I paid them $7500 on April 15th.
>>
>> I can guess at your deductions and safely guess your salary from that
>>number. No problem.
>
>You're always wrong, AlwaysWrong. We all know that you haven't the first
>inkling about math, but I'll give you a clue. You can't find many variables
>with one point on one line.
>
>...but go ahead and make a bigger fool out of yourself.


I know what you made, retard. No, your post had nothing to do with
what I know about you, Williams.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 27 Apr 2010 06:46
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:17:22 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>You're as wrong as ever, AlwaysWrong. You can deduct either state income or
>sales tax.

No, you cannot deduct sales taxes from your federal OR state returns,
idiot.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 27 Apr 2010 06:50
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 18:34:21 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>AlwaysWrong said that drives weren't even that fast (30MB/s). He was wrong
>there too, surprise, surprise.


Wrong again, asswipe. I was talking about drive-to-drive rates across
the same or separate SATA channels, not that you would know what that
refers to.
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Prev: voltage divider calcs
Next: TVS used as a zener