From: amdx on 9 Aug 2010 18:38 "John Doe" <jdoe(a)usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message news:4c606c9f$0$14081$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > "amdx" <amdx knology.net> wrote: > >> You idiots are just a bunch of name calling girlymen. > > Umm... > -- Hence the postscript....
From: John Larkin on 9 Aug 2010 20:58 On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:52:54 -0500, "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote: >You idiots are just a bunch of name calling girlymen. >Just sniping at each other for several days, nothing on >the topic. >If anything relevent to the DDWFTTW topic is added >to the thread plese let me know. > MikeK > >PS, I guess with this, you can add me to the list >of name calling girlymen. > Is "name calling girlymen" recursive? John
From: amdx on 10 Aug 2010 10:01 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:c19166hfq1r67v4nddi74e7n4i7o1cs6pp(a)4ax.com... > On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:52:54 -0500, "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote: > >>You idiots are just a bunch of name calling girlymen. >>Just sniping at each other for several days, nothing on >>the topic. >>If anything relevent to the DDWFTTW topic is added >>to the thread plese let me know. >> MikeK >> >>PS, I guess with this, you can add me to the list >>of name calling girlymen. >> > > Is "name calling girlymen" recursive? > > John > I don't know, I start thinking about it and just keep going in circles! MikeK
From: John Larkin on 10 Aug 2010 10:31 On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:01:53 -0500, "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote: > >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message >news:c19166hfq1r67v4nddi74e7n4i7o1cs6pp(a)4ax.com... >> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:52:54 -0500, "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote: >> >>>You idiots are just a bunch of name calling girlymen. >>>Just sniping at each other for several days, nothing on >>>the topic. >>>If anything relevent to the DDWFTTW topic is added >>>to the thread plese let me know. >>> MikeK >>> >>>PS, I guess with this, you can add me to the list >>>of name calling girlymen. >>> >> >> Is "name calling girlymen" recursive? >> >> John >> > I don't know, I start thinking about it and just keep going in circles! > MikeK > Aren't they due to release "Terminator 39" soon? John
From: Martin Riddle on 10 Aug 2010 18:47 "John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message news:lko266taln0t4qujirllkf7nm8i38m6dqf(a)4ax.com... > On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:01:53 -0500, "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote: > >> >>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in >>message >>news:c19166hfq1r67v4nddi74e7n4i7o1cs6pp(a)4ax.com... >>> On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:52:54 -0500, "amdx" <amdx(a)knology.net> wrote: >>> >>>>You idiots are just a bunch of name calling girlymen. >>>>Just sniping at each other for several days, nothing on >>>>the topic. >>>>If anything relevent to the DDWFTTW topic is added >>>>to the thread plese let me know. >>>> MikeK >>>> >>>>PS, I guess with this, you can add me to the list >>>>of name calling girlymen. >>>> >>> >>> Is "name calling girlymen" recursive? >>> >>> John >>> >> I don't know, I start thinking about it and just keep going in >> circles! >> MikeK >> > > Aren't they due to release "Terminator 39" soon? > > John > Didn't Arrrnhold say yes to Girlymen, the other day? Cheers
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Does this type of "hook/latch" exist? Next: Classic PosrtScript Video remastered to web |