From: mpc755 on
'Two is the magic number'
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/61472/title/Two_is_the_magic_number

"Extending an experiment at the foundation of quantum physics confirms
that two is company and three is a crowd. In a new twist on the famous
double-slit experiment, researchers have verified a basic tenet of
quantum mechanics by showing that adding a third slit doesn’t create
additional interference between packets of light.

The double-slit experiment embodies the mystery at the heart of
quantum mechanics, the famous physicist Richard Feynman observed in
his Lectures on Physics. The experiment illustrates some of the
strangest predictions of quantum mechanics, including the dual
particle-wave nature of tiny objects.

In the 1920s, German physicist Max Born proposed that particle pairs —
and not triplets, quadruplets or more — can interfere, causing their
wavelike forms to boost and diminish one another. Born’s math puts the
interference contribution of the third slit (and any additional slits)
at exactly zero. Although the reason why quantum interference stops at
two isn’t clear, Born’s postulate has been widely accepted and used by
physicists, yet until now it hadn’t been explicitly tested in
experiments.

“It’s important that you test all the postulates of quantum
mechanics,” says study coauthor Urbasi Sinha of the Institute for
Quantum Computing at the University of Waterloo in Canada. “What is
the point of just advancing a theory in its theoretical form if you
don’t have experiments backing things up?”

In the new study, Sinha and colleagues made three parallel slits in a
stainless steel plate, each 30 micrometers wide and 300 micrometers
tall. Light was sent through the slits, and detectors on the other
side tallied up the photons that passed through each. A blocking mask
allowed the researchers to open and close the three slits
independently.

If existing quantum mechanics equations (and Born’s postulate) are
right and three-party interference doesn’t happen, then the
interference pattern when all three slits were open could be explained
entirely by the combined patterns of single and double slits being
open. So Sinha and her colleagues shot photons at the triple slits
with all eight combinations of slits open and closed. Subtracting the
interference pattern caused by all seven of the other possibilities
from the pattern formed with three open slits resulted in a number
very close to zero. That result, published in Science July 23, leave
very little room for Born’s postulate to be incorrect.

“Just because you’ve added a third slit doesn’t mean that you have any
further interference coming in,” Sinha says. “You can explain it all
in terms of single and double slit contributions.”

Detecting third-party interference would have had tremendous
consequences, says theoretical physicist Fay Dowker of Imperial
College London in England. “If a non-zero result were ever to be
obtained, it would mean that quantum mechanics is wrong, in the same
way that the double-slit experiment proves that classical physics is
wrong.”

Most physicists expect that as more triple-slit experiments are
conducted with other particles such as electrons and buckyballs, the
case for Born’s postulate will get stronger, Dowker says. But she adds
that there is a small chance that the value might get stuck at a small
number hovering just above zero. “That’s the exciting thing.”

Some physicists have wanted to tweak Born’s rule to better mesh
quantum mechanics with gravity. But doing so in a way that still
agrees with experiments has been a challenge. The new study shows that
to solve some of the outstanding mysteries, theorists will probably
have to modify another piece of the puzzle. But having a value from an
actual experiment in a lab provides a “good lead toward what is
possible and what is not in these unification attempts,” Sinha says."

When the photon enters and exits the slit on the left the associated
dark matter displacement wave exiting the slit on the left interferes
with the dark matter displacement wave exiting the center slit.
Likewise, when the photon enters and exits the slit on the right the
associated dark matter displacement wave exiting the slit on the right
interferes with the dark matter displacement wave exiting the center
slit.

When the photon enters and exits the center slit the associated dark
matter displacement wave exiting the center slit is interfering with
the associated dark matter displacement waves exiting both the right
and left slits and the interference pattern is that of a single slit.
The associated dark matter displacement waves exiting the left and
right slits cancel each other out in terms of their interaction with
the associated dark matter displacement wave exiting the center slit.

More evidence of Dark Matter Displacement.
From: mpc755 on
<being article>

'Two is the magic number '
http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/61472/title/Two_is_the_magic_number

Pillar of quantum mechanics stands up to new experimentBy Laura
Sanders Web edition : Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

NOT A TRIPLE THREAT

The interference pattern (bottom) of a stream of photons (blue)
traveling through three slits can be entirely explained by the
combination of single and double interference patterns, a new study
shows.Science/AAASExtending an experiment at the foundation of quantum
physics confirms that two is company and three is a crowd. In a new
twist on the famous double-slit experiment, researchers have verified
a basic tenet of quantum mechanics by showing that adding a third slit
doesn’t create additional interference between packets of light.

The double-slit experiment embodies the mystery at the heart of
quantum mechanics, the famous physicist Richard Feynman observed in
his Lectures on Physics. The experiment illustrates some of the
strangest predictions of quantum mechanics, including the dual
particle-wave nature of tiny objects.

In the 1920s, German physicist Max Born proposed that particle pairs —
and not triplets, quadruplets or more — can interfere, causing their
wavelike forms to boost and diminish one another. Born’s math puts the
interference contribution of the third slit (and any additional slits)
at exactly zero. Although the reason why quantum interference stops at
two isn’t clear, Born’s postulate has been widely accepted and used by
physicists, yet until now it hadn’t been explicitly tested in
experiments.

“It’s important that you test all the postulates of quantum
mechanics,” says study coauthor Urbasi Sinha of the Institute for
Quantum Computing at the University of Waterloo in Canada. “What is
the point of just advancing a theory in its theoretical form if you
don’t have experiments backing things up?”

In the new study, Sinha and colleagues made three parallel slits in a
stainless steel plate, each 30 micrometers wide and 300 micrometers
tall. Light was sent through the slits, and detectors on the other
side tallied up the photons that passed through each. A blocking mask
allowed the researchers to open and close the three slits
independently.

If existing quantum mechanics equations (and Born’s postulate) are
right and three-party interference doesn’t happen, then the
interference pattern when all three slits were open could be explained
entirely by the combined patterns of single and double slits being
open. So Sinha and her colleagues shot photons at the triple slits
with all eight combinations of slits open and closed. Subtracting the
interference pattern caused by all seven of the other possibilities
from the pattern formed with three open slits resulted in a number
very close to zero. That result, published in Science July 23, leave
very little room for Born’s postulate to be incorrect.

“Just because you’ve added a third slit doesn’t mean that you have any
further interference coming in,” Sinha says. “You can explain it all
in terms of single and double slit contributions.”

Detecting third-party interference would have had tremendous
consequences, says theoretical physicist Fay Dowker of Imperial
College London in England. “If a non-zero result were ever to be
obtained, it would mean that quantum mechanics is wrong, in the same
way that the double-slit experiment proves that classical physics is
wrong.”

Most physicists expect that as more triple-slit experiments are
conducted with other particles such as electrons and buckyballs, the
case for Born’s postulate will get stronger, Dowker says. But she adds
that there is a small chance that the value might get stuck at a small
number hovering just above zero. “That’s the exciting thing.”

Some physicists have wanted to tweak Born’s rule to better mesh
quantum mechanics with gravity. But doing so in a way that still
agrees with experiments has been a challenge. The new study shows that
to solve some of the outstanding mysteries, theorists will probably
have to modify another piece of the puzzle. But having a value from an
actual experiment in a lab provides a “good lead toward what is
possible and what is not in these unification attempts,” Sinha says.

<end article>

When the photon enters and exits the slit on the left the associated
aether displacement wave exiting the slit on the left interferes with
the aether displacement wave exiting the center slit. Likewise, when
the photon enters and exits the slit on the right the associated
aether displacement wave exiting the slit on the right interferes with
the aether displacement wave exiting the center slit.

When the photon enters and exits the center slit the associated aether
displacement wave exiting the center slit is interfering with the
associated aether displacement waves exiting both the right and left
slits and the interference pattern is that of a single slit. The
associated aether displacement waves exiting the left and right slits
cancel each other out in terms of their interaction with the
associated aether displacement wave exiting the center slit. When the
photon enters and exits the center slit, the associated aether
displacement waves exiting the three slits behave as a single wave.

More evidence of Aether Displacement.