Dark Matter Displacement
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The Universe, or the local Universe we exist in, is a jet stream
Next: Quantum Gravity 400.3: Mechanical Advantage of Simple Moveable Pulley = Optimal Probable Causation/Influence dP(AB)/d(A)
From: mpc755 on 23 Jul 2010 20:15 On Jul 23, 6:47 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jul 22, 1:22 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 22, 12:03 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > On Jul 21, 8:43 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter. > > > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement > > > > > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the > > > > > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double > > > > > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters > > > > > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave > > > > > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the > > > > > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence > > > > > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into > > > > > chop) and > > > > > there is no interference. > > > > > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double > > > > > slit experiment? > > > > > > Because it always exits a single slit. > > > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' > > > > A. EINSTEINhttp://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark > > > > matter. Matter converts to dark matter. The effect this transition has > > > > on three dimensional space is energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > Energy is a substance of the universe different from aether. > > > Energy flows through space while time flows over it. > > > Time flows over the matterial substance of the universe. > > > > Mitch Raemsch > > > A change in state of the aether is energy. Time is a concept. The rate > > at which an atomic clock ticks has nothing to do with time. If a > > batter operated clock starts to tick slower has time changed or do you > > replace the batteries? You replace the batteries because you > > understand the change of state which causes the clock to tick slower. > > Just because you choose not to understand the rate at which an atomic > > clock ticks is determined by the dark matter pressure in which it > > exists does not mean time changes. It simply means you fail to > > understand what occurs physically in nature to cause the clock to tick > > at a different rate. > > > 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' > > A. EINSTEINhttp://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf > > > "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass > > diminishes by L/c2." > > > The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer > > exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark > > matter. Matter converts to dark matter. The effect this transition has > > on three dimensional space is energy.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Time is flowing through the aether of light and matter as they float > in it. > > Mitch Raemsch Dark matter and matter are different states of the same material. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark matter. Matter converts to dark matter. The effect this transition has on three dimensional space is energy. 'Hubble Finds Ghostly Ring of Dark Matter' http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/news/dark_matter_ring_feature.html "Astronomers using NASAs Hubble Space Telescope got a first-hand view of how dark matter behaves during a titanic collision between two galaxy clusters. The wreck created a ripple of dark matter, which is somewhat similar to a ripple formed in a pond when a rock hits the water." Dark matter is displaced by matter. The analogy is the bow wave of a boat. When two boats collide the wreck creates a ripple of water. Dark matter displaced by Earth exerts pressure towards Earth. Pressure exerted by displaced dark matter towards Earth is gravity.
From: mpc755 on 26 Jul 2010 07:30 On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter. > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into > chop) and > there is no interference. > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double > slit experiment? > > Because it always exits a single slit. 'Geometry and Experience (1922) by Albert Einstein' http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Geometry_and_Experience "Sub specie aeterni Poincaré, in my opinion, is right. The idea of the measuring-rod and the idea of the clock co-ordinated with it in the theory of relativity do not find their exact correspondence in the real world. It is also clear that the solid body and the clock do not in the conceptual edifice of physics play the part of irreducible elements, but that of composite structures, which may not play any independent part in theoretical physics. But it is my conviction that in the present stage of development of theoretical physics these ideas must still be employed as independent ideas; for we are still far from possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and clocks." The solid body and the clock do not in the conceptual edifice of physics play the part of irreducible elements because they are both constructed from compressed dark matter. We are no longer far from possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and clocks.
From: mpc755 on 26 Jul 2010 19:19 On Jul 26, 7:30 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter. > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement > > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the > > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double > > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters > > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave > > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the > > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence > > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into > > chop) and > > there is no interference. > > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double > > slit experiment? > > > Because it always exits a single slit. > > 'Geometry and Experience (1922) by Albert Einstein'http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Geometry_and_Experience > > "Sub specie aeterni Poincaré, in my opinion, is right. The idea of the > measuring-rod and the idea of the clock co-ordinated with it in the > theory of relativity do not find their exact correspondence in the > real world. It is also clear that the solid body and the clock do not > in the conceptual edifice of physics play the part of irreducible > elements, but that of composite structures, which may not play any > independent part in theoretical physics. But it is my conviction that > in the present stage of development of theoretical physics these ideas > must still be employed as independent ideas; for we are still far from > possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be > able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and > clocks." > > The solid body and the clock do not in the conceptual edifice of > physics play the part of irreducible elements because they are both > constructed from compressed dark matter. We are no longer far from > possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be > able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and > clocks. 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable" Space without dark matter is unthinkable. "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places". The state of the dark matter as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the dark matter in neighboring places is the dark matter's state of displacement. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark matter. As matter converts to dark matter it expands in three dimensional space. The effect this transition has on the neighboring dark matter and matter which exists in the neighboring three dimensional space is energy.
From: BURT on 26 Jul 2010 20:01 On Jul 26, 4:30 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter. > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement > > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the > > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double > > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters > > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave > > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the > > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence > > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into > > chop) and > > there is no interference. > > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double > > slit experiment? > > > Because it always exits a single slit. > > 'Geometry and Experience (1922) by Albert Einstein'http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Geometry_and_Experience > > "Sub specie aeterni Poincaré, in my opinion, is right. The idea of the > measuring-rod and the idea of the clock co-ordinated with it in the > theory of relativity do not find their exact correspondence in the > real world. It is also clear that the solid body and the clock do not > in the conceptual edifice of physics play the part of irreducible > elements, but that of composite structures, which may not play any > independent part in theoretical physics. But it is my conviction that > in the present stage of development of theoretical physics these ideas > must still be employed as independent ideas; for we are still far from > possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be > able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and > clocks." > > The solid body and the clock do not in the conceptual edifice of > physics play the part of irreducible elements because they are both > constructed from compressed dark matter. We are no longer far from > possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be > able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and > clocks.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - It's immaterial. Mitch Raemsch
From: mpc755 on 26 Jul 2010 20:11
On Jul 26, 8:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jul 26, 4:30 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter. > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement > > > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the > > > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double > > > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters > > > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave > > > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the > > > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence > > > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into > > > chop) and > > > there is no interference. > > > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double > > > slit experiment? > > > > Because it always exits a single slit. > > > 'Geometry and Experience (1922) by Albert Einstein'http://en.wikisource..org/wiki/Geometry_and_Experience > > > "Sub specie aeterni Poincaré, in my opinion, is right. The idea of the > > measuring-rod and the idea of the clock co-ordinated with it in the > > theory of relativity do not find their exact correspondence in the > > real world. It is also clear that the solid body and the clock do not > > in the conceptual edifice of physics play the part of irreducible > > elements, but that of composite structures, which may not play any > > independent part in theoretical physics. But it is my conviction that > > in the present stage of development of theoretical physics these ideas > > must still be employed as independent ideas; for we are still far from > > possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be > > able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and > > clocks." > > > The solid body and the clock do not in the conceptual edifice of > > physics play the part of irreducible elements because they are both > > constructed from compressed dark matter. We are no longer far from > > possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be > > able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and > > clocks.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > It's immaterial. > > Mitch Raemsch 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable" Space without dark matter is unthinkable. "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places". The state of the dark matter as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the dark matter in neighboring places is the dark matter's state of displacement. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark matter. As matter converts to dark matter it expands in three dimensional space. The effect this transition has on the neighboring dark matter and matter which exists in the neighboring three dimensional space is energy. |