Dark Matter Displacement
in [Physics]
|
Prev: The Universe, or the local Universe we exist in, is a jet stream
Next: Quantum Gravity 400.3: Mechanical Advantage of Simple Moveable Pulley = Optimal Probable Causation/Influence dP(AB)/d(A)
From: mpc755 on 26 Jul 2010 20:16 On Jul 26, 8:01 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jul 26, 4:30 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter. > > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement > > > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the > > > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double > > > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters > > > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave > > > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the > > > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence > > > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into > > > chop) and > > > there is no interference. > > > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double > > > slit experiment? > > > > Because it always exits a single slit. > > > 'Geometry and Experience (1922) by Albert Einstein'http://en.wikisource..org/wiki/Geometry_and_Experience > > > "Sub specie aeterni Poincaré, in my opinion, is right. The idea of the > > measuring-rod and the idea of the clock co-ordinated with it in the > > theory of relativity do not find their exact correspondence in the > > real world. It is also clear that the solid body and the clock do not > > in the conceptual edifice of physics play the part of irreducible > > elements, but that of composite structures, which may not play any > > independent part in theoretical physics. But it is my conviction that > > in the present stage of development of theoretical physics these ideas > > must still be employed as independent ideas; for we are still far from > > possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be > > able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and > > clocks." > > > The solid body and the clock do not in the conceptual edifice of > > physics play the part of irreducible elements because they are both > > constructed from compressed dark matter. We are no longer far from > > possessing such certain knowledge of theoretical principles as to be > > able to give exact theoretical constructions of solid bodies and > > clocks.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > It's immaterial. > > Mitch Raemsch 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein' http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable" Space without dark matter is unthinkable. "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places". The state of the dark matter as determined by its connections with the matter and the state of the dark matter in neighboring places is the dark matter's state of displacement. 'DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?' A. EINSTEIN http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/e_mc2.pdf "If a body gives off the energy L in the form of radiation, its mass diminishes by L/c2." The mass of the body does diminish, but the matter which no longer exists as part of the body has not vanished. It still exists, as dark matter. As matter converts to dark matter it expands in three dimensional space. The effect this transition has on the dark matter and matter which exists in the neighboring three dimensional space is energy.
From: mpc755 on 28 Jul 2010 09:36 'Two is the magic number' http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/61472/title/Two_is_the_magic_number "Extending an experiment at the foundation of quantum physics confirms that two is company and three is a crowd. In a new twist on the famous double-slit experiment, researchers have verified a basic tenet of quantum mechanics by showing that adding a third slit doesnt create additional interference between packets of light. The double-slit experiment embodies the mystery at the heart of quantum mechanics, the famous physicist Richard Feynman observed in his Lectures on Physics. The experiment illustrates some of the strangest predictions of quantum mechanics, including the dual particle-wave nature of tiny objects. In the 1920s, German physicist Max Born proposed that particle pairs and not triplets, quadruplets or more can interfere, causing their wavelike forms to boost and diminish one another. Borns math puts the interference contribution of the third slit (and any additional slits) at exactly zero. Although the reason why quantum interference stops at two isnt clear, Borns postulate has been widely accepted and used by physicists, yet until now it hadnt been explicitly tested in experiments. Its important that you test all the postulates of quantum mechanics, says study coauthor Urbasi Sinha of the Institute for Quantum Computing at the University of Waterloo in Canada. What is the point of just advancing a theory in its theoretical form if you dont have experiments backing things up? In the new study, Sinha and colleagues made three parallel slits in a stainless steel plate, each 30 micrometers wide and 300 micrometers tall. Light was sent through the slits, and detectors on the other side tallied up the photons that passed through each. A blocking mask allowed the researchers to open and close the three slits independently. If existing quantum mechanics equations (and Borns postulate) are right and three-party interference doesnt happen, then the interference pattern when all three slits were open could be explained entirely by the combined patterns of single and double slits being open. So Sinha and her colleagues shot photons at the triple slits with all eight combinations of slits open and closed. Subtracting the interference pattern caused by all seven of the other possibilities from the pattern formed with three open slits resulted in a number very close to zero. That result, published in Science July 23, leave very little room for Borns postulate to be incorrect. Just because youve added a third slit doesnt mean that you have any further interference coming in, Sinha says. You can explain it all in terms of single and double slit contributions. Detecting third-party interference would have had tremendous consequences, says theoretical physicist Fay Dowker of Imperial College London in England. If a non-zero result were ever to be obtained, it would mean that quantum mechanics is wrong, in the same way that the double-slit experiment proves that classical physics is wrong. Most physicists expect that as more triple-slit experiments are conducted with other particles such as electrons and buckyballs, the case for Borns postulate will get stronger, Dowker says. But she adds that there is a small chance that the value might get stuck at a small number hovering just above zero. Thats the exciting thing. Some physicists have wanted to tweak Borns rule to better mesh quantum mechanics with gravity. But doing so in a way that still agrees with experiments has been a challenge. The new study shows that to solve some of the outstanding mysteries, theorists will probably have to modify another piece of the puzzle. But having a value from an actual experiment in a lab provides a good lead toward what is possible and what is not in these unification attempts, Sinha says." When the photon enters and exits the slit on the left the associated dark matter displacement wave exiting the slit on the left interferes with the dark matter displacement wave exiting the center slit. Likewise, when the photon enters and exits the slit on the right the associated dark matter displacement wave exiting the slit on the right interferes with the dark matter displacement wave exiting the center slit. When the photon enters and exits the center slit the associated dark matter displacement wave exiting the center slit is interfering with the associated dark matter displacement waves exiting both the right and left slits and the interference pattern is that of a single slit. The associated dark matter displacement waves exiting the left and right slits cancel each other out in terms of their interaction with the associated dark matter displacement wave exiting the center slit. More evidence of Dark Matter Displacement.
From: mpc755 on 28 Jul 2010 20:15
<being article> 'Two is the magic number ' http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/61472/title/Two_is_the_magic_number Pillar of quantum mechanics stands up to new experimentBy Laura Sanders Web edition : Tuesday, July 27th, 2010 NOT A TRIPLE THREAT The interference pattern (bottom) of a stream of photons (blue) traveling through three slits can be entirely explained by the combination of single and double interference patterns, a new study shows.Science/AAASExtending an experiment at the foundation of quantum physics confirms that two is company and three is a crowd. In a new twist on the famous double-slit experiment, researchers have verified a basic tenet of quantum mechanics by showing that adding a third slit doesnt create additional interference between packets of light. The double-slit experiment embodies the mystery at the heart of quantum mechanics, the famous physicist Richard Feynman observed in his Lectures on Physics. The experiment illustrates some of the strangest predictions of quantum mechanics, including the dual particle-wave nature of tiny objects. In the 1920s, German physicist Max Born proposed that particle pairs and not triplets, quadruplets or more can interfere, causing their wavelike forms to boost and diminish one another. Borns math puts the interference contribution of the third slit (and any additional slits) at exactly zero. Although the reason why quantum interference stops at two isnt clear, Borns postulate has been widely accepted and used by physicists, yet until now it hadnt been explicitly tested in experiments. Its important that you test all the postulates of quantum mechanics, says study coauthor Urbasi Sinha of the Institute for Quantum Computing at the University of Waterloo in Canada. What is the point of just advancing a theory in its theoretical form if you dont have experiments backing things up? In the new study, Sinha and colleagues made three parallel slits in a stainless steel plate, each 30 micrometers wide and 300 micrometers tall. Light was sent through the slits, and detectors on the other side tallied up the photons that passed through each. A blocking mask allowed the researchers to open and close the three slits independently. If existing quantum mechanics equations (and Borns postulate) are right and three-party interference doesnt happen, then the interference pattern when all three slits were open could be explained entirely by the combined patterns of single and double slits being open. So Sinha and her colleagues shot photons at the triple slits with all eight combinations of slits open and closed. Subtracting the interference pattern caused by all seven of the other possibilities from the pattern formed with three open slits resulted in a number very close to zero. That result, published in Science July 23, leave very little room for Borns postulate to be incorrect. Just because youve added a third slit doesnt mean that you have any further interference coming in, Sinha says. You can explain it all in terms of single and double slit contributions. Detecting third-party interference would have had tremendous consequences, says theoretical physicist Fay Dowker of Imperial College London in England. If a non-zero result were ever to be obtained, it would mean that quantum mechanics is wrong, in the same way that the double-slit experiment proves that classical physics is wrong. Most physicists expect that as more triple-slit experiments are conducted with other particles such as electrons and buckyballs, the case for Borns postulate will get stronger, Dowker says. But she adds that there is a small chance that the value might get stuck at a small number hovering just above zero. Thats the exciting thing. Some physicists have wanted to tweak Borns rule to better mesh quantum mechanics with gravity. But doing so in a way that still agrees with experiments has been a challenge. The new study shows that to solve some of the outstanding mysteries, theorists will probably have to modify another piece of the puzzle. But having a value from an actual experiment in a lab provides a good lead toward what is possible and what is not in these unification attempts, Sinha says. <end article> When the photon enters and exits the slit on the left the associated aether displacement wave exiting the slit on the left interferes with the aether displacement wave exiting the center slit. Likewise, when the photon enters and exits the slit on the right the associated aether displacement wave exiting the slit on the right interferes with the aether displacement wave exiting the center slit. When the photon enters and exits the center slit the associated aether displacement wave exiting the center slit is interfering with the associated aether displacement waves exiting both the right and left slits and the interference pattern is that of a single slit. The associated aether displacement waves exiting the left and right slits cancel each other out in terms of their interaction with the associated aether displacement wave exiting the center slit. When the photon enters and exits the center slit, the associated aether displacement waves exiting the three slits behave as a single wave. More evidence of Aether Displacement. |