From: Victar Shawnberger on
On Jul 6, 11:25 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 6, 1:21 pm, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter.
>
> > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement
> > > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the
> > > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double
> > > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters
> > > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave
> > > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the
> > > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence
> > > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into
> > > chop) and
> > > there is no interference.
>
> > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double
> > > slit experiment?
>
> > > Because it always exits a single slit.
>
> > What happened to Aether Displacement?
>
> He's found himself talking to himself about aether displacement.
>
> So he tried to add spice to it by coining a word maether, which only
> he uses.

no, maether does exists, hence antimaether also must exists

you need to read more books in order to understand

>
> Since no notoriety goes to the coiner of a word that nobody else uses,
> it's time to pull out the all-stops-out measure of using somebody
> else's buzzword.
>
> If that doesn't work, then he'll move on to a theory of Afghanistan
> Displacement or Oil Spill Displacement or possibly Aether Recession.
>
> PD

From: mpc755 on
On Jul 6, 2:21 pm, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote:
> On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter.
>
> > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement
> > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the
> > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double
> > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters
> > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave
> > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the
> > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence
> > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into
> > chop) and
> > there is no interference.
>
> > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double
> > slit experiment?
>
> > Because it always exits a single slit.
>
> What happened to Aether Displacement?

Dark matter, dark energy, dark flow, dark fluid are all attempts at
describing the state of the aether. For those who insist aether must
be massless, dark matter is not massless. Dark matter and aether are
one in the same. There are no empty voids in space. All of three
dimensional space consists of mass. Whether it be dark matter and
matter, or aether and matter. It is obvious you are incapable of
understanding the physics of nature as you will undoubtedly not be
able to answer the final question in this post.

'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'
http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html

"the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places".

The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
aether's state of displacement.

The state of dark matter as determined by its connections with the
matter and the state of the dark matter in neighboring places is the
dark matter's state of displacement.

A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter.

A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement
wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the
wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double
slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters
and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave
exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the
C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence
of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into
chop) and there is no interference.

Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double
slit experiment?

Because the particle always exits a single slit.

When a double slit experiment is performed in a vacuum, how do you
know the vacuum is a void and does not consist of dark matter?

You don't.
From: BURT on
On Jul 6, 4:45 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 6, 2:21 pm, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter.
>
> > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement
> > > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the
> > > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double
> > > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters
> > > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave
> > > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the
> > > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence
> > > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into
> > > chop) and
> > > there is no interference.
>
> > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double
> > > slit experiment?
>
> > > Because it always exits a single slit.
>
> > What happened to Aether Displacement?
>
> Dark matter, dark energy, dark flow, dark fluid are all attempts at
> describing the state of the aether. For those who insist aether must
> be massless, dark matter is not massless. Dark matter and aether are
> one in the same. There are no empty voids in space. All of three
> dimensional space consists of mass. Whether it be dark matter and
> matter, or aether and matter. It is obvious you are incapable of
> understanding the physics of nature as you will undoubtedly not be
> able to answer the final question in this post.
>
> 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html
>
> "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
> with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places".
>
> The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
> matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
> aether's state of displacement.
>
> The state of dark matter as determined by its connections with the
> matter and the state of the dark matter in neighboring places is the
> dark matter's state of displacement.
>
> A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter.
>
> A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement
> wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the
> wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double
> slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters
> and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave
> exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the
> C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence
> of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into
> chop) and there is no interference.
>
> Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double
> slit experiment?
>
> Because the particle always exits a single slit.
>
> When a double slit experiment is performed in a vacuum, how do you
> know the vacuum is a void and does not consist of dark matter?
>
> You don't.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Yes you do. You would be bumping into it as you move through space.
This would snowball energy-mass. This is clearly not happening.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Uncle Ben on
On Jul 6, 5:40 pm, Victar Shawnberger <vic...(a)dcemail.com> wrote:
> On Jul 6, 11:25 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jul 6, 1:21 pm, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter.
>
> > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement
> > > > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the
> > > > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double
> > > > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters
> > > > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave
> > > > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the
> > > > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence
> > > > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into
> > > > chop) and
> > > > there is no interference.
>
> > > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double
> > > > slit experiment?
>
> > > > Because it always exits a single slit.
>
> > > What happened to Aether Displacement?
>
> > He's found himself talking to himself about aether displacement.
>
> > So he tried to add spice to it by coining a word maether, which only
> > he uses.
>
> no, maether does exists, hence antimaether also must exists
>
> you need to read more books in order to understand
>
>
>
>
>
> > Since no notoriety goes to the coiner of a word that nobody else uses,
> > it's time to pull out the all-stops-out measure of using somebody
> > else's buzzword.
>
> > If that doesn't work, then he'll move on to a theory of Afghanistan
> > Displacement or Oil Spill Displacement or possibly Aether Recession.
>
> > PD- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

There are lots of us that apparently need to read those books.
From: mpc755 on
On Jul 6, 7:52 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Jul 6, 4:45 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jul 6, 2:21 pm, Uncle Ben <b...(a)greenba.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jul 5, 3:28 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter.
>
> > > > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement
> > > > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the
> > > > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double
> > > > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters
> > > > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave
> > > > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the
> > > > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence
> > > > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into
> > > > chop) and
> > > > there is no interference.
>
> > > > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double
> > > > slit experiment?
>
> > > > Because it always exits a single slit.
>
> > > What happened to Aether Displacement?
>
> > Dark matter, dark energy, dark flow, dark fluid are all attempts at
> > describing the state of the aether. For those who insist aether must
> > be massless, dark matter is not massless. Dark matter and aether are
> > one in the same. There are no empty voids in space. All of three
> > dimensional space consists of mass. Whether it be dark matter and
> > matter, or aether and matter. It is obvious you are incapable of
> > understanding the physics of nature as you will undoubtedly not be
> > able to answer the final question in this post.
>
> > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html
>
> > "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections
> > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places".
>
> > The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the
> > matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the
> > aether's state of displacement.
>
> > The state of dark matter as determined by its connections with the
> > matter and the state of the dark matter in neighboring places is the
> > dark matter's state of displacement.
>
> > A moving C-60 molecule displaces dark matter.
>
> > A moving C-60 molecule has an associated dark matter displacement
> > wave. The C-60 molecule itself occupies a very small region of the
> > wave. The C-60 molecule enters and exits a single slit in a double
> > slit experiment. The associated dark matter displacement wave enters
> > and exits the available slits. When the dark matter displacement wave
> > exits the slits it creates interference which alters the direction the
> > C-60 molecule travels. Detecting the C-60 molecule causes decoherence
> > of the associated dark matter displacement wave (i.e. turns it into
> > chop) and there is no interference.
>
> > Why is a particle always detected exiting a single slit in a double
> > slit experiment?
>
> > Because the particle always exits a single slit.
>
> > When a double slit experiment is performed in a vacuum, how do you
> > know the vacuum is a void and does not consist of dark matter?
>
> > You don't.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Yes you do. You would be bumping into it as you move through space.
> This would snowball energy-mass. This is clearly not happening.
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Only if you are accelerating.

Dark matter behaves as a frictionless superfluid one-something.

An object moving with constant momentum does not feel friction. The
pressure exerted by dark matter towards and object moving with
constant momentum is equally applied to each and every part of the
object.

A moving object displaces dark energy. Dark energy 'displaces back'.

When an object moves with constant momentum, there is no friction or
loss of energy in the interaction of the matter which the body
consists of and the dark matter the object interacts with.