Debian cd supporting ext4.
in [Debian]
|
From: Stan Hoeppner on 27 Jul 2010 03:10 Sthu Deus put forth on 7/26/2010 6:00 AM: > Thank You for Your time and answer, Wolodja: > >> Why don't you just use the images provided by kmuto? They are exactly >> what you are looking for. I don't get your resistence ... > > No any resistance absolutely! I think too that it is the thing I'm > looking for. Just two important things remain for me w/ the solution: > > 1. If it is trustable/secure as the stable Debian (for for now all I > have is just phrases like "believe me" w/ no any farther approval from > the Debian project). In other words and including of all I have on that > item is this: I can not make strong relationship of the author's work w/ > the Debian project - I have been told he is one of the developers but, > searching for any info on him at the debian.org or a list of > developers - was unsuccessful for me. So, I even can not check the fact > as if he is still the Debian developer. Also, I do not know the Debian > project developers opinion|accreditation on his this work (the CDs he > makes). > > 2. I see that I still will need probably, to have /boot at ext3 - the > thing I do not want, so I want to know a lot on this before I try to > have ext4 again. I've really been pondering the irony of your desires WRT ext4 this entire thread. The irony is: 1. You're willing to possibly sacrifice your data to an unproven FS 2. Yet, you're totally paranoid against an installation CD that isn't "official" which will allow you to achieve [1]. News flash: ext4 isn't "Official Debian" yet either. Frankly I'm surprised people have continued to assist you, given that you resist and fight their recommendations at every turn. Let's see. Applicable American phrases that come to mind: 1. You can't have it both ways 2. You can't have your cake and eat it too 3. ... You're not going to get any assurances. No "official-ness". You are deliberately trying to do something outside of the official Debian Stable distribution. Why can you not get this through your thick skull?!?! At least a half dozen people have told you the same thing. Now shut up and do what has been recommended, or use use ext3, or better yet, XFS which is superior to all other Linux filesystems. My apologies for being rude, but someone needed to slap you upside the head and bring you to reality. -- Stan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4C4E8657.9010204(a)hardwarefreak.com
From: Aaron Toponce on 27 Jul 2010 18:30 On 7/26/2010 11:46 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: > On Lu, 26 iul 10, 12:42:05, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> >> As an ex-DPL and the guy who puts together the official release Debian >> CDs, I can vouch for his work. It's been very useful for me in the past. > > <joke>You forgot to GPG sign the mail</joke> :p Maybe this isn't the Steve McIntyre you think it is... :) -- . O . O . O . . O O . . . O . . . O . O O O . O . O O . . O O O O . O . . O O O O . O O O
From: Steve McIntyre on 27 Jul 2010 19:10 Aaron Toponce wrote: >On 7/26/2010 11:46 AM, Andrei Popescu wrote: >> On Lu, 26 iul 10, 12:42:05, Steve McIntyre wrote: >>> >>> As an ex-DPL and the guy who puts together the official release Debian >>> CDs, I can vouch for his work. It's been very useful for me in the past. >> >> <joke>You forgot to GPG sign the mail</joke> :p > >Maybe this isn't the Steve McIntyre you think it is... :) Meh :-P I read debian-user locally via a mail-to-news gateway, which makes it much more hassle for me to sign messages. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve(a)einval.com Getting a SCSI chain working is perfectly simple if you remember that there must be exactly three terminations: one on one end of the cable, one on the far end, and the goat, terminated over the SCSI chain with a silver-handled knife whilst burning *black* candles. --- Anthony DeBoer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/E1Odsrb-0004he-0M(a)jack.mossbank.org.uk
From: Sthu Deus on 28 Jul 2010 10:50 Thank You for Your time and answer, Wolodja: > Using ext4 for /boot is discouraged but you can give it a try. Why do > you need /boot to be ext4? Because I have single partition. :) Well. For now I have tried w/ two - /boot as ext3 and / as ext4 - nothing happened - I got the into the same situation as I had before, by simple converting of ext3 to ext4 - I got a statement at boot time that / can not be mounted - no such device, while a message before states, there is such an one. PS I used the "kmuto's work". -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c504331.cf7d0e0a.3b87.35c5(a)mx.google.com
From: Sthu Deus on 28 Jul 2010 10:50
Stan: > My apologies for being rude, but someone needed to slap you upside > the head and bring you to reality. For the future please note, any your farther talks will be silently ignored by me. PS Sorry for this being sent to whole the list. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c50431b.cf7d0e0a.3b87.35be(a)mx.google.com |