Does God need to prove He exists?
in [Physics]
|
From: Sam Brown on 27 Aug 2008 15:48 rbwinn wrote: > > Which commandments are impossible to keep? All of them.
From: rbwinn on 27 Aug 2008 16:15 On Aug 27, 1:40�am, "Steve O" <nospamh...(a)thanks.com> wrote: > "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote in messagenews:89bf4f65-862d-4371-91b8-ee9e57563b8a(a)q5g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Aug 27, 12:40 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 26, 6:44 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > >> <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> > On Aug 22, 11:11 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > >> > > On Aug 21, 10:56 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > >> > > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> > > > On Aug 22, 2:25 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > On Aug 21, 8:51 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > >> > > > > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> > > > > > On Aug 21, 3:08 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > On Aug 20, 9:58 pm, "Dogmantic Pyrrhonist (AKA Al)" > > >> > > > > > > <alwh...(a)optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >> > > > > > > > On Aug 21, 1:23 pm, rbwinn <rbwi...(a)juno.com> wrote: > > >> > > > > > > > > On Aug 20, 7:30 pm, Yap <hhyaps...(a)gmail.com> wrote:> > >> > > > > > > > > Well, I studied post graduate in British university at > >> > > > > > > > > Manchester city > >> > > > > > > > > > previously. > >> > > > > > > > > > There were no European propaganda but most people did > >> > > > > > > > > > not bother to > >> > > > > > > > > > talk in Christianity, due to the fact that the tales > >> > > > > > > > > > were so obviously > >> > > > > > > > > > invented. > >> > > > > > > > > > British loons in most cases got cornered when being > >> > > > > > > > > > questioned about > >> > > > > > > > > > the inability of their god to do reasonable things. > >> > > > > > > > > > They evaded and switched subjects, like you did. > > >> > > > > > > > > I don't evade and switch subjects. The subject is > >> > > > > > > > > relativity of > >> > > > > > > > > time. That is what we discuss here in > >> > > > > > > > > sci.physics.relativity. > >> > > > > > > > > Robert B. Winn > > >> > > > > > > > No. The discussion was started by a Mitch who began > >> > > > > > > > discussing the > >> > > > > > > > subject line in typical retarded fashion. And your first > >> > > > > > > > comment was > >> > > > > > > > not in any way connected to relativity. > >> > > > > > > > How many times do you need to be corrected on this lie? > > >> > > > > > > > Al > > >> > > > > > > So, Al, are you saying that we are not allowed to discuss > >> > > > > > > relativity > >> > > > > > > of time here in sci.physics.relativity? > > >> > > > > > No, I did not say that. In no way should that be infered from > >> > > > > > my > >> > > > > > comments. Your attempt to say that that is what I've said is a > >> > > > > > typical representation of your lying and attempts to sway > >> > > > > > conversations to suggest you are being repressed in some way, > >> > > > > > which > >> > > > > > again is typical of both christians and paranoid schitzos. > > >> > > > > > > How are you going to enforce > >> > > > > > > your edict? > > >> > > > > > I'm not, as it's not an edict. I am going to correct you > >> > > > > > everytime I > >> > > > > > spot you lying outright about what others or yourself have > >> > > > > > said. > > >> > > > > Well, your claim is that we do not discuss relativity of time in > >> > > > > sci.physics.relativity. > > >> > > > No, that is NOT my claim. > > >> > > Well, what is your claim, Al? I said that we discuss relativity of > >> > > time in sci.physics.relativity, and you immediately objected to that > >> > > statement and said that you were not going to allow it. > >> > > Robert B. Winn > > >> > No, I did not. I objected to your assertion that that's all you've > >> > been doing and that sci.physics.relativity is the only newsgroup > >> > you've been posting to. If you want a specific claim to attempt to > >> > refute, how about; > >> > You, rbwinn, are systematically lying about what others say and you've > >> > said in these discussions. > > >> > Al- Hide quoted text - > > >> > - Show quoted text - > > >> Well, Al, I am sorry you feel that was. � Maybe we could discuss the > >> prophecy that if a man denies God and asks to see a sign, that man is > >> an adulterer. �Steve suddenly left when that subject came up. > >> Robert B. Winn > > > That's probably because you saying that makes it perfectly clear to > > all that you've completely lost your mind. > > > It makes no sense. �What exactly did you want to discuss about it? > > > Al > > He thinks I have left. > He doesn't have the wit to understand that I have simply kill-filed him, Al. > It was interesting when he came up with that "If you deny God- you must be > an adulterer" thing. > Pity he doesn't understand that is exactly the kind of statement which > demonstrates their way of thinking. > The critical reasoning skills of these people are truly appalling and > doesn't differ much from the days when they �were running around burning old > women and saying "Only a witch would deny they are a witch!" > I kill- filed the sad sack when his posts started to become a little > sinister. > He had started talking about how he wasn't interested in society, wants the > world to end etc. > Coupled with his mental health problems, that's a dangerous mix. > I didn't want to push him any further. > I've seen what happens to those type of people before, and in Winn's case, > all of the indicators are there. > > -- > Steve O Steve didn't want to talk about adultery. Robert B. Winn
From: rbwinn on 27 Aug 2008 16:20 On Aug 27, 12:48�pm, Sam Brown <sambr...(a)bleusky.net> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > > Which commandments are impossible to keep? > > All of them. If it was impossible to keep a commandment, God would not give it. Robert B. Winn
From: Sam Brown on 27 Aug 2008 16:29 rbwinn wrote: > On Aug 27, 12:48�pm, Sam Brown <sambr...(a)bleusky.net> wrote: >> rbwinn wrote: >> >>> Which commandments are impossible to keep? >> All of them. > > If it was impossible to keep a commandment, God would not give it. Which one have you never broken?
From: rbwinn on 27 Aug 2008 17:52
On Aug 27, 1:29�pm, Sam Brown <sambr...(a)bleusky.net> wrote: > rbwinn wrote: > > On Aug 27, 12:48 pm, Sam Brown <sambr...(a)bleusky.net> wrote: > >> rbwinn wrote: > > >>> Which commandments are impossible to keep? > >> All of them. > > > If it was impossible to keep a commandment, God would not give it. > > Which one have you never broken? Thou shalt not kill. (murder). Robert B. Winn |