Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Do waves move faster in a liquid with a higher density?
Next: ...100 MW of Space Solar Power ...per single launch!
From: Patricia Aldoraz on 3 Jan 2010 20:44 On Jan 4, 12:02 pm, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.ten> wrote: > In article > <2a9d0372-698d-4cd5-89d3-637366924...(a)h9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com>, > Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > The traditional problem of induction is to show how it is reasonable > > to argue to the unknown from premises that are known and where there > > is no deduction from these premises to the conclusion. > > Utterly incorrect Always the accusation and never the evidence or analysis to back yourself up. Where did you learn these pathetic debating tricks? Go away and leave me alone.
From: Patricia Aldoraz on 3 Jan 2010 20:47 On Jan 4, 12:14 pm, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.ten> wrote: > In article > <4a071fb9-39e7-4a08-85a6-b1b6d131d...(a)c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com>, > Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 4, 9:08 am, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.ten> wrote: > > > > PA, I can provide demonstrations of my assertions. with one or two > > > common images. I'll do that when I am back at work this week. > > > Sure, you will do something you call this but you will not quote and > > explain what your assertions were, you will not explain how the > > assertions actually are relevant to the problem of induction, you will > > just further chatter. Common images? You mean the shadows on the cave > > where you do your philosophy? > > Oh, I will certainly explain the assertions - in fact, they are > perfectly clear by first observance. > What, we are into religion now? You are praying? Are you kneeling or something odd in your "observance"? > Philosophy is not a competition. It is collaboration. Collaboration for you is bandying about vague waffle from one usenet guy idiot to another. Don't stop, it is a wonder of the world.
From: Marshall on 3 Jan 2010 20:49 On Jan 3, 5:44 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 4, 12:02 pm, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.ten> wrote: > > Go away and leave me alone. Oh, come on. We're not fooled for a minute. If you wanted him to leave you alone you could have stopped replying 500 messages ago. You are totally in love with John Stafford and all the attention he gives you. Don't even bother trying to deny it; it's plain obvious. Marshall
From: Patricia Aldoraz on 3 Jan 2010 22:53 On Jan 4, 12:49 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 3, 5:44 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Jan 4, 12:02 pm, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.ten> wrote: > > > Go away and leave me alone. > > Oh, come on. We're not fooled for a minute. If you > wanted him to leave you alone you could have > stopped replying 500 messages ago. You are > totally in love with John Stafford and all the > attention he gives you. Don't even bother trying > to deny it; it's plain obvious. > OK, then. I am finally sprung! I really really fall helplessy in love with complete idiot strangers and if Jane Austen were alive, Pride and Prejudice would have a rather different set of characters and a different plot. <g>
From: Marshall on 3 Jan 2010 23:09
On Jan 3, 7:53 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 4, 12:49 pm, Marshall <marshall.spi...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jan 3, 5:44 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > On Jan 4, 12:02 pm, John Stafford <n...(a)droffats.ten> wrote: > > > > Go away and leave me alone. > > > Oh, come on. We're not fooled for a minute. If you > > wanted him to leave you alone you could have > > stopped replying 500 messages ago. You are > > totally in love with John Stafford and all the > > attention he gives you. Don't even bother trying > > to deny it; it's plain obvious. > > OK, then. I am finally sprung! I really really fall helplessy in love > with complete idiot strangers and if Jane Austen were alive, Pride and > Prejudice would have a rather different set of characters and a > different plot. <g> I salute your excellent response! This thread is the most entertainment usenet's produced in months. Marshall |