From: jmfbahciv on
Michael Gordge wrote:
> On Jan 2, 10:37 pm, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote:
>> I understood what he meant.
>
> But ewe'd prefer not to say for fear of sounding as stupid as PD.
>
> MG
I just posted an example.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
Patricia Aldoraz wrote:
> On Jan 3, 12:51 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote:
>
>> Well, now I'm considering that I don't know when I'm using
>> inductive reasoning when I'm thinking about a problem.
>
> Neither does Stafford. He just waves his hand to websites and to
> Scientific Method. You are so gullible!

did you go to that site and do the test? I did.

/BAH
From: jmfbahciv on
John Stafford wrote:

<snip --piggy-backing another post>

I got to the library and looked up that induction-reasoning
web site. I had planned to watch myself think while doing
the test. Didn't happen. I popped out the answer to each
without thinking.

If you call the process for finding those solutions
inductive reasoning, then I have to conclude that
inductive reasoning is in the hardware. I would
not use the word reasoning at all for that kind
of brain processing.

/BAH
From: M Purcell on
On Jan 3, 6:48 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote:
> John Stafford wrote:
>
> <snip --piggy-backing another post>
>
> I got to the library and looked up that induction-reasoning
> web site.  I had planned to watch myself think while doing
> the test.  Didn't happen.  I popped out the answer to each
> without thinking.

You believe thinking is a physical activity unnecessary for answering
questions?

> If you call the process for finding those solutions
> inductive reasoning, then I have to conclude that
> inductive reasoning is in the hardware.  I would
> not use the word reasoning at all for that kind
> of brain processing.

The generalization of this test to all inductive reasoning is
inductive reasoning. Apparently you are still not thinking.
From: Zinnic on
On Jan 2, 6:27 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Jan 3, 12:33 am, Zinnic <zeenr...(a)gate.net> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 2, 12:17 am, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > At least Zinnic was starting to ask a few pertinent questions. You are
> > > such a sad lot.
>
> > Hey! No fair teach. Please please take that back and tell me that I,
> > ZINNIC, am still at the bottom of your class.
>
> You have not done enough bad things lately. You are trying to gain an
> unfair advantage over that prick Stafford and Dutch! You fail. They
> are beating you to the bottom.

So I went out and did enough bad to successfully bottom me out.
Thanx.!