Prev: Do waves move faster in a liquid with a higher density?
Next: ...100 MW of Space Solar Power ...per single launch!
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Jan 2010 09:28 Michael Gordge wrote: > On Jan 2, 10:37 pm, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: >> I understood what he meant. > > But ewe'd prefer not to say for fear of sounding as stupid as PD. > > MG I just posted an example. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Jan 2010 09:29 Patricia Aldoraz wrote: > On Jan 3, 12:51 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > >> Well, now I'm considering that I don't know when I'm using >> inductive reasoning when I'm thinking about a problem. > > Neither does Stafford. He just waves his hand to websites and to > Scientific Method. You are so gullible! did you go to that site and do the test? I did. /BAH
From: jmfbahciv on 3 Jan 2010 09:48 John Stafford wrote: <snip --piggy-backing another post> I got to the library and looked up that induction-reasoning web site. I had planned to watch myself think while doing the test. Didn't happen. I popped out the answer to each without thinking. If you call the process for finding those solutions inductive reasoning, then I have to conclude that inductive reasoning is in the hardware. I would not use the word reasoning at all for that kind of brain processing. /BAH
From: M Purcell on 3 Jan 2010 09:51 On Jan 3, 6:48 am, jmfbahciv <jmfbahciv(a)aol> wrote: > John Stafford wrote: > > <snip --piggy-backing another post> > > I got to the library and looked up that induction-reasoning > web site. I had planned to watch myself think while doing > the test. Didn't happen. I popped out the answer to each > without thinking. You believe thinking is a physical activity unnecessary for answering questions? > If you call the process for finding those solutions > inductive reasoning, then I have to conclude that > inductive reasoning is in the hardware. I would > not use the word reasoning at all for that kind > of brain processing. The generalization of this test to all inductive reasoning is inductive reasoning. Apparently you are still not thinking.
From: Zinnic on 3 Jan 2010 10:48
On Jan 2, 6:27 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 3, 12:33 am, Zinnic <zeenr...(a)gate.net> wrote: > > > On Jan 2, 12:17 am, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > At least Zinnic was starting to ask a few pertinent questions. You are > > > such a sad lot. > > > Hey! No fair teach. Please please take that back and tell me that I, > > ZINNIC, am still at the bottom of your class. > > You have not done enough bad things lately. You are trying to gain an > unfair advantage over that prick Stafford and Dutch! You fail. They > are beating you to the bottom. So I went out and did enough bad to successfully bottom me out. Thanx.! |