Does inductive reasoning lead to knowledge?
in [Logic]
|
From: Michael Gordge on 12 Jan 2010 03:02 On Jan 12, 12:20 pm, Patricia Aldoraz <patricia.aldo...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > An axiom says something, About what? > the natural numbers simply exist. As what? >.............. Now, either that is an arbitrary creation of man or > > it has some undeniable objective truth. > > These are not the only possibilities. So where's the list? MG
From: Errol on 12 Jan 2010 03:20 On Jan 12, 8:58 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Jan 11, 11:45 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > I didn't see a yes or no anywhere in your answer, > > Thats encouraging, all you need do now is to expand non-contradictory > identification into your own ideas, e.g. lines that are parallel do > not converge, intersect and or diverge no matter how far their > journey. > > MG Typical of you, you cowardly name caller. You are to scared to commit in case you pick the wrong choice. You would rather blather on endlessly, ducking and diving to avoid the issue because Ayn didn't have a ready opinion on the matter you can jot down, without having to do any thinking yourself.
From: Michael Gordge on 12 Jan 2010 04:27 On Jan 12, 6:23 pm, Errol <vs.er...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Forget parrallel lines. The postulate is about two lines that are NOT > parrallel. > They can either be converging or diverging. So which is it? MG
From: Zinnic on 12 Jan 2010 06:57 On Jan 12, 3:27 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Jan 12, 6:23 pm, Errol <vs.er...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Forget parrallel lines. The postulate is about two lines that are NOT > > parrallel. > > They can either be converging or diverging. > > So which is it? > > MG Who is the 1000 th ?
From: Zinnic on 12 Jan 2010 06:58
On Jan 12, 3:27 am, Michael Gordge <mikegor...(a)xtra.co.nz> wrote: > On Jan 12, 6:23 pm, Errol <vs.er...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > Forget parrallel lines. The postulate is about two lines that are NOT > > parrallel. > > They can either be converging or diverging. > > So which is it? > > MG Me? |