EINSTEIN WAS RIGHT - SPACE AND TIME BEND
in [Physics]
|
Prev: summary of "history of physics" and how discoveries of theories are made Chapt 2 #159; ATOM TOTALITY
Next: Probabilistic Parametrization calling all geese
From: Me, ...again! on 15 Jun 2010 06:44 Good morning, Arindam. I am up this morning, with coffee, and seeing what dogmatic mischeif jBm is up to, today. ////////////////////////////////// On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Arindam Banerjee wrote: > On Jun 14, 10:46 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Jun 14, 8:35 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...(a)gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >>> On Jun 14, 10:31 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> On Jun 13, 4:57 pm, use...(a)mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr. >> >>>> Jai Maharaj) wrote: >>>>> Einstein was right: space and time bend >> >>>>> Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe >>>>> has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on >>>>> to show that the other half of relativity also works >> >>>>> By Anushka Asthana and David Smith >>>>> The Observer, U.K. >>>>> guardian.co.uk >>>>> Sunday, April 15, 2007 >> >>>>> Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple >>>>> definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the >>>>> question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, >>>>> seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the >>>>> universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind -- or at >>>>> least half proved it. >> >>>>> The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most >>>>> complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better >>>>> than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago -- that an >>>>> object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and >>>>> time. >> >>>>> But this -- what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect -- is only >>>>> half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the >>>>> world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it. >> >>>>> Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted >>>>> his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told >>>>> scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight >>>>> months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely. >> >>>>> 'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said >>>>> William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist >>>>> starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses >>>>> dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing >>>>> out the toothbrushes now.' >> >>>>> The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but >>>>> suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests >>>>> corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that >>>>> stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and >>>>> Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres -- ultra >>>>> precise gyroscopes -- to detect minute distortions in the fabric of >>>>> the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet >>>>> if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity. >> >>>>> According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a >>>>> elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so >>>>> planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging >>>>> cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but >>>>> not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued >>>>> Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been >>>>> previously thought. >> >>>>> Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in >>>>> December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most >>>>> esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple >>>>> equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe >>>>> are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the >>>>> Royal Astronomical Society. >> >>>>> He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and >>>>> confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and >>>>> length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already >>>>> been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the >>>>> announcement would 'fork no lightning'. >> >>>>> The theory explained >> >>>>> When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he >>>>> found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac >>>>> Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and >>>>> time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object >>>>> distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater >>>>> the effect. >> >>>>> Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric >>>>> and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time -- a >>>>> phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the >>>>> trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball. >> >>>> 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html >> >>>> "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections >>>> with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... >>>> disregarding the causes which condition its state." >> >>>> The state of the aether as determined by its connections with the >>>> matter and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the >>>> aether's state of displacement. >> >>>> Aether and matter are different states of the same material. >>>> The material is maether. >>>> Maether has mass. >>>> Aether and matter have mass. >>>> Aether is uncompressed maether and matter is compressed maether. >>>> Aether is displaced by matter. >>>> The aether is not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'. >>>> The 'displacing back' is the pressure exerted by the aether. >>>> Gravity is pressure exerted by displaced aether towards matter. >> >>>> Just as a bowling ball placed in a tank of water displaces the water, >>>> so does matter displace the aether. >> >>> No. Aether permeates everything. Everything moves in aether, and >>> aether is in everything. >> >>> Cheers, >>> Arindam Banerjee >> >> Correct. > > Good. > >> The aether permeates everything except the nuclei of an atom. > > The volume of actual matter in any atom is very small as a percentage > value of the atom size, going by fundamental atomic theory. Matter > being defined as a substance capable of being affected by forces, > though this is tautological as force is also defined in terms of > matter. So ultimately we do not know very much about matter. The > most powerful microscopes shows any atom as just a blob. > >> Each and every nuclei which an object consists of displaces the >> aether. > > Aether by definition is a solid, which cannot be displaced like a gas > or liquid. However, it can be twisted (sheared) and perhaps this is > what you mean. Let us say a nucleus shears aether. This may be, or > may not be. We cannot know. The aether may also fill the nuclei, which > could be porous to the aether. > >> The bowling ball analogy is more accurate if you consider the bowling >> ball to consist of millions of tiny particles separated by springs. > > Or held together? > > In >> this analogy each of the particles which constitute the bowling >> displaces the water at the same time the water exists throughout the >> bowling ball. The bowling ball which consists of millions of tiny >> particles separated by springs still displaces the water. > > Firstly the aether is solid, so it does not get displaced. For a > solid is a solid if its components do NOT get displaced with respect > to each other - save for temporaray shears. So the analogy is more > like putting a sieve with very fine mesh through potato mash. So fine > that as the sieve goes through the potato mash, the potato mash > remains undisturbed. A bit of mash may twist a bit as the mesh > presses it, but reforms after the mesh has passed through. Matter is > the sieve, and aether the mash, in this analogy. It is not a good > analogy, for potato mash is not that convincing a solid, but may do > for the purpose. > >> Just as a bowling ball, consisting of millions of tiny particles >> separated by springs, placed in a tank of water displaces the water, >> as does matter, which consists of nuclei separated by aether, >> displaces the aether. > > No. See above. Solids cannot be displaced, only sheared. > > Just as a void does not remain in the displaced >> water when the bowling ball is removed due to the pressure exerted by >> the water towards the bowling ball, the displaced aether exerts >> pressure towards the matter > > The sheared ether is what carries all radiant energies, and this is > what we all must accept when we throw out the quantum theoretic > nonsense (along with entropy and relativity). By concentrating and > basing all future physics upon: > > c(v=V) = c(mu,ep) + V and > e=0.5mVV(N-k) > > Once reputed institutes allow me to lecture how right the above are, > and how wrong e=mcc is, I can publish my book "The Principles of > Motion". One step at a time! Let us throw e=mcc out first, by going > through > > http://adda-enterprises.com/MMInt/MMint.htm where the extraordinary > bungle made by Einstein is clearly exposed. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee >
From: Paul Stowe on 19 Jun 2010 13:13 On Jun 14, 5:35 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 14, 10:31 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 13, 4:57 pm, use...(a)mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr. > > > Jai Maharaj) wrote: > > > Einstein was right: space and time bend > > > > Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe > > > has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on > > > to show that the other half of relativity also works > > > > By Anushka Asthana and David Smith > > > The Observer, U.K. > > > guardian.co.uk > > > Sunday, April 15, 2007 > > > > Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple > > > definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the > > > question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, > > > seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the > > > universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind -- or at > > > least half proved it. > > > > The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most > > > complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better > > > than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago -- that an > > > object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and > > > time. > > > > But this -- what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect -- is only > > > half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the > > > world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it. > > > > Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted > > > his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told > > > scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight > > > months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely. > > > > 'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said > > > William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist > > > starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses > > > dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing > > > out the toothbrushes now.' > > > > The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but > > > suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests > > > corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that > > > stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and > > > Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres -- ultra > > > precise gyroscopes -- to detect minute distortions in the fabric of > > > the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet > > > if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity. > > > > According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a > > > elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so > > > planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging > > > cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but > > > not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued > > > Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been > > > previously thought. > > > > Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in > > > December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most > > > esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple > > > equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe > > > are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the > > > Royal Astronomical Society. > > > > He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and > > > confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and > > > length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already > > > been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the > > > announcement would 'fork no lightning'. > > > > The theory explained > > > > When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he > > > found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac > > > Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and > > > time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object > > > distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater > > > the effect. > > > > Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric > > > and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time -- a > > > phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the > > > trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball. > > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > > "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections > > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... > > disregarding the causes which condition its state." > > > The state of theaetheras determined by its connections with the > > matter and the state of theaetherin neighboring places is the > >aether'sstate of displacement. > > >Aetherand matter are different states of the same material. > > The material is maether. > > Maether has mass. > >Aetherand matter have mass. > >Aetheris uncompressed maether and matter is compressed maether. > >Aetheris displaced by matter. > > Theaetheris not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'. > > The 'displacing back' is the pressure exerted by theaether. > > Gravity is pressure exerted by displacedaethertowards matter. > > > Just as a bowling ball placed in a tank of water displaces the water, > > so does matter displace theaether. > > No.Aetherpermeates everything. Everything moves inaether, andaetheris in everything. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee > > Just as a void does not remain in > > > > > the displaced water when the bowling ball is removed due to the > > pressure exerted by the water towards the bowling ball, the displaced > >aetherexerts pressure towards the matter. Right on! Poor MPC755 cannot seem to grasp that simple concept... Paul Stowe
From: Paul Stowe on 19 Jun 2010 13:42 On Jun 14, 5:46 am, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 14, 8:35 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 14, 10:31 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 13, 4:57 pm, use...(a)mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr. > > > > Jai Maharaj) wrote: > > > > Einstein was right: space and time bend > > > > > Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe > > > > has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on > > > > to show that the other half of relativity also works > > > > > By Anushka Asthana and David Smith > > > > The Observer, U.K. > > > > guardian.co.uk > > > > Sunday, April 15, 2007 > > > > > Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple > > > > definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the > > > > question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, > > > > seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the > > > > universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind -- or at > > > > least half proved it. > > > > > The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most > > > > complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better > > > > than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago -- that an > > > > object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and > > > > time. > > > > > But this -- what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect -- is only > > > > half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the > > > > world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it. > > > > > Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted > > > > his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told > > > > scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight > > > > months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely. > > > > > 'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said > > > > William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist > > > > starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses > > > > dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing > > > > out the toothbrushes now.' > > > > > The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but > > > > suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests > > > > corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that > > > > stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and > > > > Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres -- ultra > > > > precise gyroscopes -- to detect minute distortions in the fabric of > > > > the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet > > > > if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity. > > > > > According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a > > > > elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so > > > > planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging > > > > cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but > > > > not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued > > > > Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been > > > > previously thought. > > > > > Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in > > > > December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most > > > > esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple > > > > equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe > > > > are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the > > > > Royal Astronomical Society. > > > > > He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and > > > > confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and > > > > length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already > > > > been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the > > > > announcement would 'fork no lightning'. > > > > > The theory explained > > > > > When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he > > > > found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac > > > > Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and > > > > time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object > > > > distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater > > > > the effect. > > > > > Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric > > > > and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time -- a > > > > phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the > > > > trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball. > > > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > > > "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections > > > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, .... > > > disregarding the causes which condition its state." > > > > The state of theaetheras determined by its connections with the > > > matter and the state of theaetherin neighboring places is the > > >aether'sstate of displacement. > > > >Aetherand matter are different states of the same material. > > > The material is maether. > > > Maether has mass. > > >Aetherand matter have mass. > > >Aetheris uncompressed maether and matter is compressed maether. > > >Aetheris displaced by matter. > > > Theaetheris not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'. > > > The 'displacing back' is the pressure exerted by theaether. > > > Gravity is pressure exerted by displacedaethertowards matter. > > > > Just as a bowling ball placed in a tank of water displaces the water, > > > so does matter displace theaether. > > > No.Aetherpermeates everything. Everything moves inaether, and > >aetheris in everything. > > > Cheers, > > Arindam Banerjee > > Correct. Theaetherpermeates everything except the nuclei of an atom. > Each and every nuclei which an object consists of displaces theaether. > > The bowling ball analogy is more accurate if you consider the bowling > ball to consist of millions of tiny particles separated by springs. In > this analogy each of the particles which constitute the bowling > displaces the water at the same time the water exists throughout the > bowling ball. The bowling ball which consists of millions of tiny > particles separated by springs still displaces the water. > > Just as a bowling ball, consisting of millions of tiny particles > separated by springs, placed in a tank of water displaces the water, > as does matter, which consists of nuclei separated byaether, > displaces theaether. Just as a void does not remain in the displaced > water when the bowling ball is removed due to the pressure exerted by > the water towards the bowling ball, the displacedaetherexerts > pressure towards the matter. Sorry, Atoms are just harmonic solitons NOT! foreign objects displacing the medium. But, for your copious rambling you will N-E-V- E-R consider anything but your rather silly concept.
From: Paul Stowe on 19 Jun 2010 13:43
On Jun 14, 5:35 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 14, 10:31 pm, mpc755 <mpc...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 13, 4:57 pm, use...(a)mantra.com and/orwww.mantra.com/jai(Dr. > > > Jai Maharaj) wrote: > > > Einstein was right: space and time bend > > > > Ninety years after he expounded his famous theory, a $700m Nasa probe > > > has proved that the universe behaves as he said. Now the race is on > > > to show that the other half of relativity also works > > > > By Anushka Asthana and David Smith > > > The Observer, U.K. > > > guardian.co.uk > > > Sunday, April 15, 2007 > > > > Under his name in the Oxford English Dictionary is the simple > > > definition: genius. Yet for decades physicists have been asking the > > > question: did Albert Einstein get it wrong? After half a century, > > > seven cancellations and $700m, a mission to test his theory about the > > > universe has finally confirmed that the man was a mastermind -- or at > > > least half proved it. > > > > The early results from Gravity Probe B, one of Nasa's most > > > complicated satellites, confirmed yesterday 'to a precision of better > > > than 1 per cent' the assertion Einstein made 90 years ago -- that an > > > object such as the Earth does indeed distort the fabric of space and > > > time. > > > > But this -- what is referred to as the 'geodetic' effect -- is only > > > half of the theory. The other, 'frame-dragging', stated that as the > > > world spins it drags the fabric of the universe behind it. > > > > Francis Everitt, the Stanford University professor who has devoted > > > his life to investigating Einstein's theory of relativity, told > > > scientists at the American Physical Society it would be another eight > > > months before he could measure the 'frame-dragging' effect precisely. > > > > 'Understanding the details is a bit like an archeological dig,' said > > > William Bencze, programme manager for the mission. 'A scientist > > > starts with a bulldozer, follows with a shovel, then finally uses > > > dental picks and toothbrushes to clear the dust away. We're passing > > > out the toothbrushes now.' > > > > The Gravity Probe B project was conceived in the late 1950s but > > > suffered decades of delays while other scientists ran tests > > > corroborating Einstein's theory. It was Everitt's determination that > > > stopped it being cancelled. The joint mission between Nasa and > > > Stanford University uses four of the most perfect spheres -- ultra > > > precise gyroscopes -- to detect minute distortions in the fabric of > > > the universe. Everitt's aim was to prove to the highest precision yet > > > if Einstein was correct in the way he described gravity. > > > > According to Einstein, in the same way that a large ball placed on a > > > elasticated cloth stretches the fabric and causes it to sag, so > > > planets and stars warp space-time. A marble moving along the sagging > > > cloth will be drawn towards the ball, as the Earth is to the Sun, but > > > not fall into it as long as it keeps moving at speed. Gravity, argued > > > Einstein, was not an attractive force between bodies as had been > > > previously thought. > > > > Few scientists need the final results, which will be revealed in > > > December, to convince them of Einstein's genius. 'From the most > > > esoteric aspects of time dilation through to the beautiful and simple > > > equation, e=mc2, the vast bulk of Einstein's ideas about the universe > > > are standing up to the test of time,' said Robert Massey, from the > > > Royal Astronomical Society. > > > > He said the mission was 'legitimate science' to test a theory and > > > confirm its brilliance, but others have criticised the costs and > > > length of the study, claiming that what was announced had already > > > been shown. Sir Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal, said the > > > announcement would 'fork no lightning'. > > > > The theory explained > > > > When Einstein wrote his general theory of relativity in 1915, he > > > found a new way to describe gravity. It was not a force, as Sir Isaac > > > Newton had supposed, but a consequence of the distortion of space and > > > time, conceived together in his theory as 'space-time'. Any object > > > distorts the fabric of space-time and the bigger it is, the greater > > > the effect. > > > > Just as a bowling ball placed on a trampoline stretches the fabric > > > and causes it to sag, so planets and stars warp space-time -- a > > > phenomenon known as the 'geodetic effect'. A marble moving along the > > > trampoline will be drawn inexorably towards the ball. > > > 'Ether and the Theory of Relativity by Albert Einstein'http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Extras/Einstein_ether.html > > > "the state of the [ether] is at every place determined by connections > > with the matter and the state of the ether in neighbouring places, ... > > disregarding the causes which condition its state." > > > The state of theaetheras determined by its connections with the > > matter and the state of theaetherin neighboring places is the > >aether'sstate of displacement. > > >Aetherand matter are different states of the same material. > > The material is maether. > > Maether has mass. > >Aetherand matter have mass. > >Aetheris uncompressed maether and matter is compressed maether. > >Aetheris displaced by matter. > > Theaetheris not at rest when displaced and 'displaces back'. > > The 'displacing back' is the pressure exerted by theaether. > > Gravity is pressure exerted by displacedaethertowards matter. > > > Just as a bowling ball placed in a tank of water displaces the water, > > so does matter displace theaether. > > No.Aetherpermeates everything. Everything moves inaether, andaetheris in everything. > > Cheers, > Arindam Banerjee > > Just as a void does not remain in > > > > > the displaced water when the bowling ball is removed due to the > > pressure exerted by the water towards the bowling ball, the displaced > >aetherexerts pressure towards the matter. Right on! Poor MPC755 cannot seem to grasp that simple concept... Paul Stowe |