From: ajay on
On Oct 11, 6:22 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 11, 9:04 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 11, 3:38 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > wrote:> On Oct 10, 11:09 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > <snipped more whining from baby>
>
> > > > Ajay Sharma            www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> > > "It implies that Einstein's this derivation is true under special
> > > conditions not in general. Hence more generalized equation ?E = Ac2?m
> > > has been suggested, here A is coefficient of proportionality like many
> > > others existing in physics, since days of Aristotle, Newton etc. It
> > > starts news discussion on the basic science. E = Ac2?m is very useful
> > > in understanding the pre-Big Bang origin of the universe besides many
> > > other phenomena elaborated in the book." -  Ajay Sharma
>
> > > Could you tell me in which language this is written?
>
> > -------
> > To
> >     Robert Higgins
> > I am getting your question translated, then will reply.
>
> > Ajay Sharma            www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> May someday you get you papers translated into English - I hear it a
> very popoular language for science. Maybe you could also take a couple
> courses in elementary math and physics at the local community college
> (or the equivalent institution in India).- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

----------
To
Robert Higgins
You need to take MANY courses in math and physics
to understand the things.

AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Robert Higgins on
On Oct 11, 9:25 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 11, 6:22 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 11, 9:04 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 11, 3:38 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > > wrote:> On Oct 10, 11:09 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > <snipped more whining from baby>
>
> > > > > Ajay Sharma            www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> > > > "It implies that Einstein's this derivation is true under special
> > > > conditions not in general. Hence more generalized equation ?E = Ac2?m
> > > > has been suggested, here A is coefficient of proportionality like many
> > > > others existing in physics, since days of Aristotle, Newton etc. It
> > > > starts news discussion on the basic science. E = Ac2?m is very useful
> > > > in understanding the pre-Big Bang origin of the universe besides many
> > > > other phenomena elaborated in the book." -  Ajay Sharma
>
> > > > Could you tell me in which language this is written?
>
> > > -------
> > > To
> > >     Robert Higgins
> > > I am getting your question translated, then will reply.
>
> > > Ajay Sharma            www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> > May someday you get you papers translated into English - I hear it a
> > very popoular language for science. Maybe you could also take a couple
> > courses in elementary math and physics at the local community college
> > (or the equivalent institution in India).- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> ----------
> To
>        Robert Higgins
> You need to take MANY  courses in math and physics
> to understand the things.

That is why I HAVE taken many such courses. When will YOU take even a
few?

>
> AJAY SHARMA              www.AjayOnLine.us

From: ajay on
On Oct 11, 6:30 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Oct 11, 9:25 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 11, 6:22 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 11, 9:04 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Oct 11, 3:38 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com>
> > > > wrote:> On Oct 10, 11:09 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > <snipped more whining from baby>
>
> > > > > > Ajay Sharma            www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> > > > > "It implies that Einstein's this derivation is true under special
> > > > > conditions not in general. Hence more generalized equation ?E = Ac2?m
> > > > > has been suggested, here A is coefficient of proportionality like many
> > > > > others existing in physics, since days of Aristotle, Newton etc. It
> > > > > starts news discussion on the basic science. E = Ac2?m is very useful
> > > > > in understanding the pre-Big Bang origin of the universe besides many
> > > > > other phenomena elaborated in the book." -  Ajay Sharma
>
> > > > > Could you tell me in which language this is written?
>
> > > > -------
> > > > To
> > > >     Robert Higgins
> > > > I am getting your question translated, then will reply.
>
> > > > Ajay Sharma            www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> > > May someday you get you papers translated into English - I hear it a
> > > very popoular language for science. Maybe you could also take a couple
> > > courses in elementary math and physics at the local community college
> > > (or the equivalent institution in India).- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > ----------
> > To
> >        Robert Higgins
> > You need to take MANY  courses in math and physics
> > to understand the things.
>
> That is why I HAVE taken many such courses. When will YOU take even a
> few?
>
>
>
>
>
> > AJAY SHARMA              www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--------
To
Robert Higgins

That is all right. Also quality of courses matter.

AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Dono. on
On Oct 10, 4:52 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Oct 10, 9:29 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 9, 8:41 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Correct version is
> > > Correct version is
> > > hf* = Mc2 + hf/A
> > > hf* = Mc2 + hf
> > > ---------------------------
> > > 0 = hf/A – hf = hf (1/A-1) or A =1 (4)
>
> > Correct, A=1. So ALL your papers are wrong. Congratulations, you
> > managed to prove ALL your papers incorrect.
>
> ----------
> Addressed to Dono
>
> No link in your statement and above post.
>
> Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us

Well, you managed to prove your own papers wrong all by yourself, so
there is no need for any link. Congratulations!

From: ajay on
On Oct 11, 8:06 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> On Oct 10, 4:52 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Oct 10, 9:29 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 9, 8:41 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > >           Correct version is
> > > > Correct version is
> > > >        hf* = Mc2 + hf/A
> > > >        hf* = Mc2 + hf
> > > >      ---------------------------
> > > >       0 = hf/A – hf = hf (1/A-1) or A =1                    (4)
>
> > > Correct, A=1. So ALL your papers are wrong. Congratulations, you
> > > managed to prove ALL your papers incorrect.
>
> > ----------
> > Addressed to Dono
>
> > No link in your statement and above post.
>
> > Ajay Sharma          www.AjayOnLine.us
>
> Well, you managed to prove your own papers wrong all by yourself, so
> there is no need for any link. Congratulations!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

------
To
DONO

Face the truth.

Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us