From: ajay on 11 Oct 2009 09:25 On Oct 11, 6:22 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 11, 9:04 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 11, 3:38 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > wrote:> On Oct 10, 11:09 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > <snipped more whining from baby> > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > "It implies that Einstein's this derivation is true under special > > > conditions not in general. Hence more generalized equation ?E = Ac2?m > > > has been suggested, here A is coefficient of proportionality like many > > > others existing in physics, since days of Aristotle, Newton etc. It > > > starts news discussion on the basic science. E = Ac2?m is very useful > > > in understanding the pre-Big Bang origin of the universe besides many > > > other phenomena elaborated in the book." - Ajay Sharma > > > > Could you tell me in which language this is written? > > > ------- > > To > > Robert Higgins > > I am getting your question translated, then will reply. > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > May someday you get you papers translated into English - I hear it a > very popoular language for science. Maybe you could also take a couple > courses in elementary math and physics at the local community college > (or the equivalent institution in India).- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ---------- To Robert Higgins You need to take MANY courses in math and physics to understand the things. AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Robert Higgins on 11 Oct 2009 09:30 On Oct 11, 9:25 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 11, 6:22 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Oct 11, 9:04 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 11, 3:38 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > > wrote:> On Oct 10, 11:09 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > <snipped more whining from baby> > > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > > "It implies that Einstein's this derivation is true under special > > > > conditions not in general. Hence more generalized equation ?E = Ac2?m > > > > has been suggested, here A is coefficient of proportionality like many > > > > others existing in physics, since days of Aristotle, Newton etc. It > > > > starts news discussion on the basic science. E = Ac2?m is very useful > > > > in understanding the pre-Big Bang origin of the universe besides many > > > > other phenomena elaborated in the book." - Ajay Sharma > > > > > Could you tell me in which language this is written? > > > > ------- > > > To > > > Robert Higgins > > > I am getting your question translated, then will reply. > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > May someday you get you papers translated into English - I hear it a > > very popoular language for science. Maybe you could also take a couple > > courses in elementary math and physics at the local community college > > (or the equivalent institution in India).- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > ---------- > To > Robert Higgins > You need to take MANY courses in math and physics > to understand the things. That is why I HAVE taken many such courses. When will YOU take even a few? > > AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
From: ajay on 11 Oct 2009 09:36 On Oct 11, 6:30 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 11, 9:25 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 11, 6:22 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > On Oct 11, 9:04 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 11, 3:38 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > > > wrote:> On Oct 10, 11:09 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > <snipped more whining from baby> > > > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > > > "It implies that Einstein's this derivation is true under special > > > > > conditions not in general. Hence more generalized equation ?E = Ac2?m > > > > > has been suggested, here A is coefficient of proportionality like many > > > > > others existing in physics, since days of Aristotle, Newton etc. It > > > > > starts news discussion on the basic science. E = Ac2?m is very useful > > > > > in understanding the pre-Big Bang origin of the universe besides many > > > > > other phenomena elaborated in the book." - Ajay Sharma > > > > > > Could you tell me in which language this is written? > > > > > ------- > > > > To > > > > Robert Higgins > > > > I am getting your question translated, then will reply. > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > May someday you get you papers translated into English - I hear it a > > > very popoular language for science. Maybe you could also take a couple > > > courses in elementary math and physics at the local community college > > > (or the equivalent institution in India).- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > ---------- > > To > > Robert Higgins > > You need to take MANY courses in math and physics > > to understand the things. > > That is why I HAVE taken many such courses. When will YOU take even a > few? > > > > > > > AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -------- To Robert Higgins That is all right. Also quality of courses matter. AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Dono. on 11 Oct 2009 11:06 On Oct 10, 4:52 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 10, 9:29 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > On Oct 9, 8:41 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Correct version is > > > Correct version is > > > hf* = Mc2 + hf/A > > > hf* = Mc2 + hf > > > --------------------------- > > > 0 = hf/A hf = hf (1/A-1) or A =1 (4) > > > Correct, A=1. So ALL your papers are wrong. Congratulations, you > > managed to prove ALL your papers incorrect. > > ---------- > Addressed to Dono > > No link in your statement and above post. > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us Well, you managed to prove your own papers wrong all by yourself, so there is no need for any link. Congratulations!
From: ajay on 11 Oct 2009 12:23
On Oct 11, 8:06 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Oct 10, 4:52 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 10, 9:29 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > On Oct 9, 8:41 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Correct version is > > > > Correct version is > > > > hf* = Mc2 + hf/A > > > > hf* = Mc2 + hf > > > > --------------------------- > > > > 0 = hf/A hf = hf (1/A-1) or A =1 (4) > > > > Correct, A=1. So ALL your papers are wrong. Congratulations, you > > > managed to prove ALL your papers incorrect. > > > ---------- > > Addressed to Dono > > > No link in your statement and above post. > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > Well, you managed to prove your own papers wrong all by yourself, so > there is no need for any link. Congratulations!- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ------ To DONO Face the truth. Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us |