Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
in [Relativity]
|
From: ajay on 12 Oct 2009 11:12 On Oct 12, 7:11 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Oct 11, 11:21 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 12, 10:26 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > On Oct 11, 7:38 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 12, 5:13 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > On Oct 11, 9:23 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 11, 8:06 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Oct 10, 4:52 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Oct 10, 9:29 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Oct 9, 8:41 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Correct version is > > > > > > > > > > Correct version is > > > > > > > > > > hf* = Mc2 + hf/A > > > > > > > > > > hf* = Mc2 + hf > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------- > > > > > > > > > > 0 = hf/A - hf = hf (1/A-1) or A =1 (4) > > > > > > > > > > Correct, A=1. So ALL your papers are wrong. Congratulations, you > > > > > > > > > managed to prove ALL your papers incorrect. > > > > > > > > > ---------- > > > > > > > > Addressed to Dono > > > > > > > > > No link in your statement and above post. > > > > > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > > > > > Well, you managed to prove your own papers wrong all by yourself, so > > > > > > > there is no need for any link. Congratulations!- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > To > > > > > > DONO > > > > > > > Face the truth. > > > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > > > You did a very good job proving your OWN papers WRONG. > > > > > Congratulations !- Hide quoted text - > > > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > ------ > > > > To > > > > Dono > > > > > Give proofs > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > Look at your OWN posts, nutjob.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > ------- > > To > > DONO > > I looked at , these are right. > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > Yes, they all prove that A=1, so your papers are all wrong.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --------- To DONO Conceptual meaning of A In DE = Ac2Dm, 'A' is coefficient of proportionality, and its value depends upon experimental and inherent conditions of the process. Its value varies from one process to other. There are similar examples in existing physics Hubble's constant {50 and 80 kilometers per second-Megaparsec (Mpc)} or coefficient of viscosity (1.05x10^-3 poise to 19.2x10^-6 poise) or co-efficient of thermal conductivity (0.02Wm^-1K-1 to 400 Wm^-1K^-1 ) etc or value of resistivity. The value of resistivity (a) metal and alloys varies from 1.6x10^-8 to 49x10^-8 Ùm (b) for semiconductor it is 3.2x10^-5 to 2300 Ùm (c) for insulators 10^10-10^16 Ùm There are numerous examples in existing physics when co-efficient of proportionality vary from one situation to other. In DE = Ac2Dm, 'A' is also co-efficient of proportionality. Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Dono. on 12 Oct 2009 11:31 On Oct 12, 8:12 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > DONO > Conceptual meaning of A > > In DE = Ac2Dm, 'A' is coefficient of proportionality, and its value > depends upon experimental and inherent conditions of the process. ....but you demonstrated in every post that A=1. Congratulations for proving your papers wrong all by yourself!
From: ajay on 12 Oct 2009 21:59 On Oct 12, 8:31 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Oct 12, 8:12 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > DONO > > Conceptual meaning of A > > > In DE = Ac2Dm, 'A' is coefficient of proportionality, and its value > > depends upon experimental and inherent conditions of the process. > > ...but you demonstrated in every post that A=1. Congratulations for > proving your papers wrong all by yourself! ------- To Dono No I did not demonstrate. A=1 can from set of equations given by Dr Drake, who did mistake of student of 8th class. The vale of A can be less, more or equal to one. Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Dono. on 12 Oct 2009 22:16 On Oct 12, 6:59 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 12, 8:31 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > > > On Oct 12, 8:12 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > DONO > > > Conceptual meaning of A > > > > In DE = Ac2Dm, 'A' is coefficient of proportionality, and its value > > > depends upon experimental and inherent conditions of the process. > > > ...but you demonstrated in every post that A=1. Congratulations for > > proving your papers wrong all by yourself! > > ------- > > To > Dono > > No I did not demonstrate. > A=1 can from set of equations given by Dr Drake, who did mistake of > student of 8th class. > The vale of A can be less, more or equal to one. > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us Nope, A is ALWAYS equal to 1. E^2-(p*c)^2=(m_0*c^2)^2 (1) According to experimen, E=Mc^2. According to you: E=A*(Mc^2). So: (Mc^2)^2-(p*c)^2=(m_0*c^2)^2 (2) (A*Mc^2)^2-(p*c)^2=(m_0*c^2)^2 (3) ------------------------------------- (A-1)^2*(Mc^2)^2=0 (4) so A=1.
From: doug on 13 Oct 2009 00:14
ajay wrote: > On Oct 12, 8:31 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > >>On Oct 12, 8:12 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> DONO >>>Conceptual meaning of A >> >>>In DE = Ac2Dm, 'A' is coefficient of proportionality, and its value >>>depends upon experimental and inherent conditions of the process. >> >>...but you demonstrated in every post that A=1. Congratulations for >>proving your papers wrong all by yourself! > > > ------- > > To > Dono > > No I did not demonstrate. > A=1 can from set of equations given by Dr Drake, who did mistake of > student of 8th class. > The vale of A can be less, more or equal to one. > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us So far, all you have done is to show that you whine a lot and have no physics to offer. You are like all the other cranks who feel they know something that real scientists do not. |