Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
in [Relativity]
|
From: ajay on 23 Oct 2009 09:16 On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > ajay wrote: > > -------- > > > > > > > To > > > Inertial > > > How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse > > > ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine > > that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground > > state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of > > frequency f '' > > > There are three energies here , but you say 4. > > there is no left over energy as you have claimed. > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant > whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand > it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --------- To Doug Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Inertial on 23 Oct 2009 09:18 "ajay" <ajayonline.us(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:6fd95ecf-dd3f-4291-bf5a-7bbb7b13ccc5(a)k26g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> ajay wrote: >> >> -------- >> >> >> >> >> >> > To >> >> > Inertial >> >> > How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse >> >> > ''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine >> > that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground >> > state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of >> > frequency f '' >> >> > There are three energies here , but you say 4. >> > there is no left over energy as you have claimed. >> >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us >> >> Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant >> whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand >> it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted >> text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > --------- > To > Doug > > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. No .. he has shown very simply and clearly how your theory violates it. But you're too much of an idiot to understand that
From: doug on 23 Oct 2009 11:04 ajay wrote: > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > >>ajay wrote: >> >> -------- >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>To >> >>>Inertial >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of >>> frequency f '' >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted text - >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > --------- > To > Doug > > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here which is at zero. > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: ajay on 23 Oct 2009 19:41 On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > ajay wrote: > > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > >>ajay wrote: > > >> -------- > > >>>To > > >>>Inertial > > >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse > > >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine > >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground > >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of > >>> frequency f '' > > >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. > >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. > > >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant > >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand > >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted text - > > >>- Show quoted text - > > > --------- > > To > > Doug > > > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. > You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here > which is at zero. > > > > > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ------------- To Doug Under what conditions energy is conseved? Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Inertial on 23 Oct 2009 20:13
"ajay" <ajayonline.us(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> ajay wrote: >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> >> >>ajay wrote: >> >> >> -------- >> >> >>>To >> >> >>>Inertial >> >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse >> >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine >> >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground >> >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of >> >>> frequency f '' >> >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. >> >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. >> >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us >> >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant >> >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted >> >>text - >> >> >>- Show quoted text - >> >> > --------- >> > To >> > Doug >> >> > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. >> >> No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. >> You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here >> which is at zero. >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > ------------- > To > Doug > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be. Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted. |