Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 26 Oct 2009 19:15 "ajay" <ajayonline.us(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:53f3cd8c-be8b-4239-b754-2ca262edcfde(a)u13g2000vbb.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 26, 9:29 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> ajay wrote: >> > On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> >>"ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >>news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... >> >> >>>On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>"ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >>>>news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372(a)l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... >> >> >>>>>On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>>"ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> >>>>>>>>news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... >> >> >>>>>>>>>On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>>>>ajay wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>ajay wrote: >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>> -------- >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>To >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Inertial >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>for >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>pharse >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>frequency f '' >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>there is no left over energy as you have claimed. >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant >> >>>>>>>>>>>>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand >> >>>>>>>>>>>>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide >> >>>>>>>>>>>>quoted >> >>>>>>>>>>>>text - >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>>- Show quoted text - >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>--------- >> >>>>>>>>>>>To >> >>>>>>>>>>> Doug >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of >> >>>>>>>>>>>LAW >> >>>>>>>>>>>OF >> >>>>>>>>>>>CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. >> >> >>>>>>>>>>No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. >> >>>>>>>>>>You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here >> >>>>>>>>>>which is at zero. >> >> >>>>>>>>>>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext- >> >> >>>>>>>>>>- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> >>>>>>>>>>- Show quoted text - >> >> >>>>>>>>>------------- >> >>>>>>>>>To >> >>>>>>>>> Doug >> >> >>>>>>>>>Under what conditions energy is conseved? >> >> >>>>>>>>You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your >> >>>>>>>>theory >> >>>>>>>>(that A >> >>>>>>>>is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it >> >>>>>>>>should be. >> >>>>>>>>Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- >> >>>>>>>>Hide >> >>>>>>>>quoted text - >> >> >>>>>>>>- Show quoted text - >> >> >>>>>>>-------------- >> >> >>>>>>>To >> >>>>>>> Doug >> >> >>>>>>>Give specific reply so that we may proceed further >> >> >>>>>>>Under what conditions energy is conseved? >> >> >>>>>>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted >> >>>>>>>text - >> >> >>>>>>>- Show quoted text - >> >> >>>>>>interesting- Hide quoted text - >> >> >>>>>>- Show quoted text - >> >> >>>>>------- >> >> >>>>>To >> >>>>> Doug >> >> >>>>>Give specific reply so that we may proceed further >> >> >>>>There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has already explained it to >> >>>>you. >> >>>>We here have explained how he is correct and how you have misread >> >>>>what he >> >>>>wrote. All have shown that your theory is wrong.- Hide quoted text - >> >> >>>>- Show quoted text - >> >> >>>To >> >> >>> Doug >> >> >>>Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy and which conditions it >> >>>holds? >> >> >>Yes .. but that would serve no purpose. Drake has explained nicely why >> >>your >> >>theory results in lack of conservation of energy (indeed, it generates >> >>energy from nothing when A is not 1). If you don't understand >> >>conservation >> >>of energy, you should not be publishing physics. If you do, you don't >> >>need >> >>to ask me to explain it to you. Stop wasting everyone's time.- Hide >> >>quoted text - >> >> >>- Show quoted text - >> >> > ---------- >> >> > To >> > Inertial >> >> > Like 8th class math, Dr Drake has misinterpretted Law of Conservation >> > of Energy. >> > He has applied Law of Conservation of energy, to NON-ISOLATED SYETEM. >> > The value of 'A' has been calculated >> > simply implies the condition, when LAW OF COSERVATION OF ENERGY HOLDS >> > good to ISOLATED SYSTEM . >> >> > Here condition is A=1, it has nothing to do with E=Ac^2m. >> > If we apply E=Ac^2m , to isolated system then results are OK. >> >> > Recently I have replied him in 15 page reply. I am also sending the >> > letter to other officials of American Physical Society, >> > so the they may also understand his high handedness and misuse of >> > office and bad name he os getting to APS , New York >> >> He will have a good laugh except for being pestered by a crank. >> The APS people will also have a good laugh. >> >> >> >> >> >> > AJAY SHARMA www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > ----- > > To > INERTIAL > > Can you define Law of Conservation of Energy ? Yes.. I've told you that already.
From: zimdoo zimdoo on 28 Oct 2009 12:45 On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20(a)w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com.... > > > > On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >>news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea(a)y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > > > >> > On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> >>news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups..com... > > > >> >> > On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> >> >>news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829(a)s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com... > > > >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> >> >> >>news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4(a)n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > > > >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> >> >> >> >>news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> >> >> >> >> >>news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63(a)j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com... > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840(a)p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial" > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372(a)l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > message > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> ajay wrote: > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > <x...(a)xx.com> > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>ajay wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> -------- > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>To > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>Inertial > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>form > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>correct > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>eqaution > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>for > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>pharse > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>passed > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>through a > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>machine > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>that converts it back into a > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>hydrogen > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>atom > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>in > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>its > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>ground > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>state with mass M plus a > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>low-frequency > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>photon > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>of > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> frequency f '' > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>you > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>say > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>4. > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> have > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> claimed. > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>www.AjayOnLine.us > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>look > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>with > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>your > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>constant > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>whining? Drake explained your > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>mistake. > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>You > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>cannot > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>understand > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>yours. > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Get > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>over > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>it.- > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Hide > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>quoted > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > --------- > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > To > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Doug > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Drake has simply shown his > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > limitations > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > in > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > understanding > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > of > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > LAW > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > OF > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> not > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> conserve > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> energy. > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> You having tantrums here does not help > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> your > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> credibility > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> here > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> which is at zero. > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Ajay Sharma > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext- > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------- > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > To > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Doug > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Under what conditions energy is > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > conseved? > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > You mean you don't know? And you're > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > submitting > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > papers? > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > theory > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > (that A > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > is not always 1) results in energy not > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > being > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > conserved > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > where > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > it > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > should be. > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your theory breaks conservation laws. > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > theory > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > is > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > refuted.- > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Hide > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > quoted text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > - Show quoted text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -------------- > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > To > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doug > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Give specific reply so that we may proceed > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > further > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ajay Sharma > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - Show quoted text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> interesting- Hide quoted text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ------- > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > To > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doug > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Give specific reply so that we may proceed > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > further > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> already > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> explained- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -... > > read more » -------- Inertial You are making tall claims then why dont you define Law of Conservation of Momentum. Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: ajay on 28 Oct 2009 18:03 On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20(a)w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com.... > > > > > On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >>news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea(a)y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> > On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >> >>news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >> > On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >> >> >>news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829(a)s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >> >> >> >>news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4(a)n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >> >> >> >> >>news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >>news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63(a)j4g2000yqe..googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840(a)p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial" > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372(a)l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > message > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx..com> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> ajay wrote: > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > <x...(a)xx.com> > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>ajay wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> -------- > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>To > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>Inertial > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>form > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>correct > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>eqaution > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>for > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>pharse > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>passed > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>through a > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>machine > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>that converts it back into a > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>hydrogen > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>atom > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>in > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>its > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>ground > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>state with mass M plus a > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>low-frequency > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>photon > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>of > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> frequency f '' > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>you > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>say > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>4. > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> have > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> claimed. > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>look > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>with > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>your > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>constant > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>whining? Drake explained your > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>mistake. > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>You > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>cannot > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>understand > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>yours. > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Get > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>over > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>it.- > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Hide > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>quoted > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > --------- > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > To > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Doug > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Drake has simply shown his > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > limitations > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > in > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > understanding > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > of > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > LAW > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > OF > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> not > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> conserve > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> energy. > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> You having tantrums here does not help > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> your > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> credibility > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> here > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> which is at zero. > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Ajay Sharma > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext- > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------- > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > To > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Doug > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Under what conditions energy is > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > conseved? > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > You mean you don't know? And you're > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > submitting > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > papers? > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > theory > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > (that A > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > is not always 1) results in energy not > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > being > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > conserved > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > where > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > it > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > should be. > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your theory breaks conservation laws. > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > theory > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > is > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > refuted.- > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Hide > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > quoted text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > - Show quoted text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -------------- > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > To > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doug > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Give specific reply so that we may proceed > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > further > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Ajay Sharma > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > - Show quoted text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> interesting- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> - Show quoted text - > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > ------- > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > To > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doug > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Give specific reply so that we may proceed > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > further > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> already > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> explained- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -... > > > read more » > > -------- > Inertial > > You are making tall claims then why dont you define Law of > Conservation of Momentum. > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us ++++++++++++++++++ To INETRIAL If you know LAW OF CONSERVATION OF ENERGY DISCUSS IT HERE. Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: ajay on 29 Oct 2009 08:08 On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > >news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20(a)w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >>news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea(a)y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> > On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> >>news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> >> > On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> >> >>news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829(a)s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> >> >> >>news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4(a)n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> >> >> >> >>news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >>news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63(a)j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest..com> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840(a)p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial" > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372(a)l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > message > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> ajay wrote: > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > <x...(a)xx.com> > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>ajay wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> -------- > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>To > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>Inertial > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>form > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>correct > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>eqaution > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>for > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>pharse > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>passed > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>through a > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>machine > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>that converts it back into a > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>hydrogen > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>atom > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>in > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>its > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>ground > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>state with mass M plus a > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>low-frequency > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>photon > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>of > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> frequency f '' > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>you > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>say > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>4. > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> have > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> claimed. > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>look > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>with > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>your > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>constant > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>whining? Drake explained your > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>mistake. > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>You > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>cannot > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>understand > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>yours. > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Get > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>over > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>it.- > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Hide > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>quoted > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>text - > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > --------- > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > To > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Doug > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Drake has simply shown his > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > limitations > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > in > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > understanding > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > of > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > LAW > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > OF > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> not > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> conserve > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> energy. > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> You having tantrums here does not help > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> your > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> credibility > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> here > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> which is at zero. > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Ajay Sharma > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext- > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> text - > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------- > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > To > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Doug > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Under what conditions energy is > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > conseved? > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > You mean you don't know? And you're > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > submitting > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > papers? > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > theory > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > (that A > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > is not always 1) results in energy not > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > being > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > conserved > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > where > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > it > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > should be. > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your theory breaks conservation laws. > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > theory > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > is > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > refuted.- > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Hide > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > quoted text - > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > - Show quoted text - > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > -------------- > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > To > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Doug > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > Give specific reply so that we may proceed > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > further- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -... > > read more » ..
From: zimdoo zimdoo on 29 Oct 2009 12:31
On Oct 29, 5:08 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 29, 3:03 am, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 28, 9:45 pm, zimdoo zimdoo <zim...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Oct 28, 6:03 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > On Oct 28, 1:05 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > >news:e9f3199f-8cd2-472f-923d-d645b0659c20(a)w37g2000prg.googlegroups..com... > > > > > > > On Oct 28, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >>news:9a0ddcf1-d5a5-4f73-b1a2-eee29d44d5ea(a)y23g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> > On Oct 28, 4:50 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >> >>news:9ccf4809-6d9b-4ac6-a229-1c372b4bdb8c(a)k19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> >> > On Oct 28, 2:37 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >> >> >>news:5251bec5-f96d-4665-aa1b-898c9a3e7829(a)s15g2000yqs.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 6:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >> >> >> >>news:12180349-a918-4c71-b5fb-ff8ae1f5efb4(a)n22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 5:36 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >>news:88e8dcd3-1fd7-4741-9d74-41d3756ca082(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 7:31 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >>news:bbd4e288-8223-460c-8541-b01ce80e8a63(a)j4g2000yqe.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 27, 4:14 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:92b88413-f59b-4457-82b6-0288751f1840(a)p9g2000vbl.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 26, 4:22 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:26e25ae3-b3c7-48f4-9ded-79ac2088f30e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 7:15 pm, "Inertial" > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372(a)l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > <relativ...(a)rest.com> > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > message > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x....(a)xx.com> > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> ajay wrote: > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > <x...(a)xx.com> > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>ajay wrote: > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >> -------- > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>To > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>Inertial > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>form > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>correct > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>eqaution > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>for > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>pharse > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>passed > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>through a > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>machine > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>that converts it back into a > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>hydrogen > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>atom > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>in > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>its > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>ground > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>state with mass M plus a > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>low-frequency > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>photon > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>of > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> frequency f '' > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>you > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>say > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>4. > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> have > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>> claimed. > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>>www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>look > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>with > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>your > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>constant > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>whining? Drake explained your > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>mistake. > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>You > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>cannot > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>understand > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>yours. > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Get > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>over > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>it.- > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>Hide > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>quoted > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>text - > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > --------- > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > To > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Doug > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Drake has simply shown his > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > limitations > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > in > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > understanding > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > of > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > LAW > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > OF > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> not > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> conserve > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> energy. > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> You having tantrums here does not help > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> your > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> credibility > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> here > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> which is at zero. > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> > Ajay Sharma > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> >www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext- > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> text - > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > ------------- > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > To > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Doug > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > Under what conditions energy is > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > conseved? > > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > You mean you don't know? And you're > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > submitting > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > papers? > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > theory > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > (that A > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > is not always 1) results in energy not > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > being > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > conserved > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > where > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > it > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > should be. > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your theory breaks conservation laws. > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Your > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > theory > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > is > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > refuted.- > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > Hide > > > > > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > quoted- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -... > > read more » >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.... To INERIAL Why dont you define law of conservation of energy, if you know it. zimdoo |