Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
in [Relativity]
|
From: ajay on 24 Oct 2009 09:07 On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > >> ajay wrote: > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > >> >>ajay wrote: > > >> >> -------- > > >> >>>To > > >> >>>Inertial > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine > >> >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground > >> >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of > >> >>> frequency f '' > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant > >> >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted > >> >>text - > > >> >>- Show quoted text - > > >> > --------- > >> > To > >> > Doug > > >> > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. > >> You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here > >> which is at zero. > > >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > ------------- > > To > > Doug > > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A > is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be.. > Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -------------- To Doug Give specific reply so that we may proceed further Under what conditions energy is conseved? Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: tomy tomy on 24 Oct 2009 19:28 On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... > > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > >> ajay wrote: > > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > > >> >>ajay wrote: > > > >> >> -------- > > > >> >>>To > > > >> >>>Inertial > > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse > > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine > > >> >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground > > >> >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of > > >> >>> frequency f '' > > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. > > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. > > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant > > >> >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand > > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted > > >> >>text - > > > >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > >> > --------- > > >> > To > > >> > Doug > > > >> > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. > > >> You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here > > >> which is at zero. > > > >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > ------------- > > > To > > > Doug > > > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > > You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A > > is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be. > > Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > -------------- > > To > Doug > > Give specific reply so that we may proceed further > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - interesting
From: ajay on 25 Oct 2009 10:06 On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > > >news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com.... > > > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > > >> ajay wrote: > > > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: > > > > >> >>ajay wrote: > > > > >> >> -------- > > > > >> >>>To > > > > >> >>>Inertial > > > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse > > > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine > > > >> >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground > > > >> >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of > > > >> >>> frequency f '' > > > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. > > > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. > > > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > > > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant > > > >> >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand > > > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted > > > >> >>text - > > > > >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > > >> > --------- > > > >> > To > > > >> > Doug > > > > >> > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF > > > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. > > > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. > > > >> You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here > > > >> which is at zero. > > > > >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext - > > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> - Show quoted text - > > > > > ------------- > > > > To > > > > Doug > > > > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > > > You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A > > > is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be. > > > Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > > -------------- > > > To > > Doug > > > Give specific reply so that we may proceed further > > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > interesting- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - ------- To Doug Give specific reply so that we may proceed further Under what conditions energy is conseved? Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us
From: Inertial on 25 Oct 2009 10:15 "ajay" <ajayonline.us(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:24042f47-0c84-480c-9ff5-456fe39c6372(a)l31g2000vbp.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> > > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >> > >news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... >> >> > > > On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> > > >> ajay wrote: >> > > >> > On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> >> > > >> >>ajay wrote: >> >> > > >> >> -------- >> >> > > >> >>>To >> >> > > >> >>>Inertial >> >> > > >> >>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for >> > > >> >>>pharse >> >> > > >> >>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine >> > > >> >>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground >> > > >> >>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of >> > > >> >>> frequency f '' >> >> > > >> >>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. >> > > >> >>> there is no left over energy as you have claimed. >> >> > > >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us >> >> > > >> >>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant >> > > >> >>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand >> > > >> >>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide >> > > >> >>quoted >> > > >> >>text - >> >> > > >> >>- Show quoted text - >> >> > > >> > --------- >> > > >> > To >> > > >> > Doug >> >> > > >> > Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW >> > > >> > OF >> > > >> > CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. >> >> > > >> No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. >> > > >> You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here >> > > >> which is at zero. >> >> > > >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext - >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> > > >> - Show quoted text - >> >> > > > ------------- >> > > > To >> > > > Doug >> >> > > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? >> >> > > You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory >> > > (that A >> > > is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it >> > > should be. >> > > Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- Hide >> > > quoted text - >> >> > > - Show quoted text - >> >> > -------------- >> >> > To >> > Doug >> >> > Give specific reply so that we may proceed further >> >> > Under what conditions energy is conseved? >> >> > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hide quoted >> > text - >> >> > - Show quoted text - >> >> interesting- Hide quoted text - >> >> - Show quoted text - > > ------- > > To > Doug > > > Give specific reply so that we may proceed further There is no 'further' to proceed. Drake has already explained it to you. We here have explained how he is correct and how you have misread what he wrote. All have shown that your theory is wrong.
From: doug on 25 Oct 2009 13:26
ajay wrote: > On Oct 25, 4:28 am, tomy tomy <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >>On Oct 24, 6:07 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >>>On Oct 24, 5:13 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >>>>"ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> >>>>news:ef4961ff-3ab3-4d03-8f67-21efd534376e(a)33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com... >> >>>>>On Oct 23, 8:04 pm, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>ajay wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On Oct 23, 8:36 am, doug <x...(a)xx.com> wrote: >> >>>>>>>>ajay wrote: >> >>>>>>>> -------- >> >>>>>>>>>To >> >>>>>>>>>Inertial >> >>>>>>>>>How I can believe you , when did not form correct eqaution for pharse >> >>>>>>>>>''The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine >>>>>>>>>that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground >>>>>>>>>state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of >>>>>>>>>frequency f '' >> >>>>>>>>>There are three energies here , but you say 4. >>>>>>>>>there is no left over energy as you have claimed. >> >>>>>>>>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us >> >>>>>>>>Do you have any clue how silly you look with your constant >>>>>>>>whining? Drake explained your mistake. You cannot understand >>>>>>>>it. That is not his problem, it is yours. Get over it.- Hide quoted >>>>>>>>text - >> >>>>>>>>- Show quoted text - >> >>>>>>>--------- >>>>>>>To >>>>>>> Doug >> >>>>>>>Drake has simply shown his limitations in understanding of LAW OF >>>>>>>CONSERVATION OF ENERGY. >> >>>>>>No, he was explaining to you why you do not conserve energy. >>>>>>You having tantrums here does not help your credibility here >>>>>>which is at zero. >> >>>>>>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hidequotedtext - >> >>>>>>- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>>>- Show quoted text - >> >>>>>------------- >>>>>To >>>>> Doug >> >>>>>Under what conditions energy is conseved? >> >>>>You mean you don't know? And you're submitting papers? Your theory (that A >>>>is not always 1) results in energy not being conserved where it should be. >>>>Your theory breaks conservation laws. Your theory is refuted.- Hide quoted text - >> >>>>- Show quoted text - >> >>>-------------- >> >>>To >>> Doug >> >>>Give specific reply so that we may proceed further >> >>>Under what conditions energy is conseved? >> >>>Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us-Hide quoted text - >> >>>- Show quoted text - >> >>interesting- Hide quoted text - >> >>- Show quoted text - > > > ------- > > To > Doug > > > Give specific reply so that we may proceed further > > > Under what conditions energy is conseved? > Read Drakes writeup. He explains it quite well. If you do not understand that, there is no hope for you. > > Ajay Sharma www.AjayOnLine.us > |