Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
in [Relativity]
|
From: Inertial on 14 Nov 2009 09:18 "Dono." <sa_ge(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:247d667b-9788-488b-8c50-ae080440bbdb(a)i12g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 13, 2:33 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I suspect "tomy tomy" and "zimdoo zimdoo" are sock puppets for ajay >> sharma. THey are all gmail accounts by illiterates. > > No, "tmy tomy"'s a fake idiot who has been on this website for quite a > while. He delights in making fun of true idiots like ajay sharma and > of fake "knw-it-alls" like Inertial. Nothing fake about me.
From: Inertial on 14 Nov 2009 09:19 "ajay" <ajayonline.us(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:f870dd4c-5e8c-44f9-805f-fabb8fbbe345(a)w37g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 14, 4:08 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> On Nov 13, 2:33 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> > I suspect "tomy tomy" and "zimdoo zimdoo" are sock puppets for ajay >> > sharma. THey are all gmail accounts by illiterates. >> >> No, "tmy tomy"'s a fake idiot who has been on this website for quite a >> while. He delights in making fun of true idiots like ajay sharma and >> of fake "knw-it-alls" like Inertial. > > 00000000000000000000000000000 > > I AM TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER. I TEACH SUCH THINGS TO STUDENTS AS > MY PROFESSION. > > Dr Gordon W.F. Drake subtracted 8th class > level equations wrongly. He has quoted two equations, > > Subtraction > hf* = Mc2 + hf/A (1) > hf* = Mc2 + hf (2) > � � � > --------------------------------- > 0 = 0 + hf ( 1/A � 1) >> or A =1 (3) > > But according to Editor, PRA, Dr Gordon W F Drake, eq.(3) is > incorrect and correct result is in eq.(4) i.e. > Difference in eq.(2) and eq.(1) = hf (1/A � 1) = Net > energy (4) > > Did you even read what he said? No. If you had you'd know better > It is incorrect even student of 8th class knows. Dr Gordon W.F. > Drake should know in LHS is subtracted from LHS. > > IT IS THE BIGGEST PROOF THAT DR DRAKE HAS DONE 8TH CLASS MATH. > When this discussion is worldwide he should come and tell world what > he knows. > He is wrong so he is hidden in the shed. > Only culprits hide themselves. > Here is Dr Drake ALL TIME culprit of Science and American Physical > Society. > > Tomytomy HAHAH .. Ajay has given himself away by posting with his name as Tomytomy
From: Inertial on 14 Nov 2009 09:20 "tomy tomy" <tomytomy786(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:5da81582-211b-4d0d-b38d-615b076786e5(a)g22g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 14, 11:48 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> On Nov 13, 7:59 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > On Nov 14, 4:08 am, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: >> >> > I AM TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER. >> >> Nah, you are just a pathetic idiot. > > ------------- > Idiot > > Attend 8th standard algebra class. > > tomytomy You are just Ajay posting under another name. . what a low underhanded dishonest and pathetic little person you are. Go away.
From: Inertial on 14 Nov 2009 09:21 "ajay" <ajayonline.us(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:cf149bef-2239-4ef2-9d3b-ea01cbd801e7(a)h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com... > On Nov 14, 3:33 am, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: >> On Nov 13, 4:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: >> >> > "tomy tomy" <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message >> > Did you even read what he said? No. If you had you'd know better >> >> > > It is incorrect even student of 8th class knows. Dr Gordon W.F. >> > > Drake should know in LHS is subtracted from LHS. >> >> > Then you are not even up to 8th grade standard .. You have no right to >> > be a >> > teacher. >> >> > > WHAT ELSE PROOF IS REQUIRED. >> >> > Show me WHERE Dr Drake did what you claimed. I have read his letter. >> > Have >> > you read what Drake actually wrote? or are you believing the nutcase >> > Ajay? >> >> I suspect "tomy tomy" and "zimdoo zimdoo" are sock puppets for ajay >> sharma. THey are all gmail accounts by illiterates. > > 00000000000000000000000000000000 > > > I AM TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER. I TEACH SUCH THINGS TO STUDENTS AS > MY PROFESSION. > > > Dr Gordon W.F. Drake subtracted 8th class > level equations wrongly. He has quoted two equations, > Subtraction > hf* = Mc2 + hf/A (1) > hf* = Mc2 + hf (2) > � � � > --------------------------------- > 0 = 0 + hf ( 1/A � 1) >> or A =1 (3) > > But according to Editor, PRA, Dr Gordon W F Drake, eq.(3) is > incorrect and correct result is in eq.(4) i.e. > Difference in eq.(2) and eq.(1) = hf (1/A � 1) = Net > energy (4) > Did you even read what he said? No. If you had you'd know better > It is incorrect even student of 8th class knows. Dr Gordon W.F. > Drake should know in LHS is subtracted from LHS. > IT IS THE BIGGEST PROOF THAT DR DRAKE HAS DONE 8TH CLASS MATH. > When this discussion is worldwide he should come and tell world what > he knows. > He is wrong so he is hidden in the shed. > Only culprits hide themselves. > Here is Dr Drake ALL TIME culprit of Science and American Physical > Society. > > Tomytomy BAHAHAHA ,... Ajay is TomyTomy, as suspected. You're a liar and a fraud. You have no credibility.
From: Jang Jin Hong on 14 Nov 2009 10:01
On 10ì4ì¼, ì¤ì 1ì34ë¶, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG > subtraction of 8th Class mathematics. > > It is done to save Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation of E =mc2 > > Dr Drake is REQUESTED to justify himself as he is associated with > world's most famous American Physical Society. > > Email of Dr Gordon W.F. Drake:  p...(a)aps.org, 001-631-591-4000, > Email of Ajay Sharma ajay.shar...(a)rediffmail.com,  0091 94184 50899 > Website  www.AjayOnLine.us > >                       Part I > Ajay Sharma has sent paper to Editor Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. > Drake 17 March 2008 manuscript no. DQ10345A. > > The title of the paper >  Experimental and theoretical feasibilities of conversion factor >   other than c2 in mass energy inter-conversion equation >   by Ajay Sharma > >    Wrong subtraction of 8th class mathematics in letter dated 19 > June 2008 by > Dr Gordon W.F. Drake > > In letter dated 19 June 2008, wrote equations and then doing wrong > subtraction of  8th standard  level. In my paper I have justified that > Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation of E =mc2, also gives > E 'proportional to' mc2 > or  E =Ac2m > i.e. E =mc2 is generalized as E =Ac2m > >  Dr Gordon W.F. Drakes perception of cyclic process in Email dated 19 > June 2008 > > 1.  A hydrogen atom of mass M in its ground state absorbs a >   photon of frequency f and makes a transition >   to the first excited state. > > 2. The hydrogen atom of mass M* in its excited state is then >   converted entirely into the energy of a high-frequency >   photon of frequency f*. >  Then > >   hf* = M*c^2 = Mc^2 + hf/A. >   hf* = Mc2 + hf/ > A.                             (1) > > 3. The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine >   that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground >   state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of >   frequency f. > >    hf* =Mc2 + > hf > (2) > > Subtraction by Editor Gordon W.F.Drake of eq.(1) and eq.(2) > >    hf* = Mc2 + hf/A >    hf* =Mc2 + hf >    --------------------------- > Difference = hf/A â hf = hf (1/A-1) > (3) > and interpreted it. > >  WRONG, 8th class subtraction by Editor Dr W.F. Drake. > >  Dr Drake has forgotten the basic definition of equation that it has > LHS and RHS. Further basic rule which is taught to 8th class student > is while subtraction is that LHS of one equation is subtracted from > LHS from second equation. RHS of one equation is subtracted from the > second equation. > > Mistake of Dr Drake:  Dr Drake did not subtract LHS of eq.(1)  from > LHS of eq.(2), which is absolutely wrong. > Correct version is >     hf* = Mc2 + hf/A >     hf* = Mc2 + hf >    --------------------------- >    0 = hf/A â hf = hf (1/A-1) or A =1           (4) > LHS is subtracted from LHS, (hf* - hf* = 0) and RHS is subtracted from > RHS (hf/A â hf). > As the Left Hand Sides of both the equations are equal, hence the > difference is zero. > Thus Dr Drake applied 8th class mathematics incorrectly. > >                    Part II > >   What was Drakes' motive behind remarks? > > Ajay Sharma in paper manuscript DQ10345A > > Experimental and theoretical feasibilities of conversion factor >   other than c2 in mass energy inter-conversion equation > > has generalized  E = mc2  to E =Ac2m on the basis concrete theoretical > and experimental evidences. > >      Now Editor Dr Gordon W.F. Drake, wanted to prove this > generalization is wrong and he invented own mechanism for this. > But in the process he proved, that he did 8th class mathematics WRONG. > > Thus Dr Drake is wrong, and generalization of E=mc2 to E =Ac2m is > correct. > >  The theme of Einstein's paper of Sep. 1905 of E = mc2 > > (i) Einstein's Sep.1905, derivation of E = mc2 also predicts that >           E 'proportional to'  mc2. > The reason for above deduction is that Einstein derived ïE=ïmc2 under > SPECIAL CONDITIONS, and under GENERAL CONDITIONS the result, > >       E 'proportional to'  mc2  or  E > =Ac2m              (5) > > It is justified by Ajay Sharma in manuscript DQ10345A. > >   What is meant by Special Conditions in Einstein's Sep. 1905 > derivation? > > In Einstein's derivation of E=mc2 of Sep. 1905 there are four > variables and Einstein took suitable values of variables. This > derivation involves emission of light energy by luminous body. > (a) Luminous body under consideration emits only TWO waves. > (b) Luminous body emits two waves of EQAUL magnitudes. > (c) Two waves are emitted by body in exactly opposite directions (ï¦ = > 0 and ï¦ =180). > > (d) Einstein has taken velocity in classical region (v<<c and applied > binomial theorem). > > Under the Special or handpicked conditions, Einstein derived > >       L = > mc2                               (6) > > where L is light energy emitted by body. Then Einstein replaced L by E > to get > >       E = > mc2                                (7) > > What is meant by General Conditions in Einstein's derivation? > > The conditions other than taken by Einstein are called General > conditions. For example, > > (A) The body emits LARGE NUMBER of light waves. > (B) The waves emitted are of DIFFERENT MAGNITUDES. > (C) Body emits waves at DIFFERENT ANGLES. > > (D)  Light emitting body may be at rest. > > Under the General or handpicked conditions, Einstein derived (typical > calculations) > >  L = mc2/1141 = 0.000876mc2 > (8) >  L  'proportional to'  mc2 > As above, > E  'proportional to'  mc2    or   E =Ac2m. > (5) > > Then, E =Ac2m. is applied in various cases. >  For further information visit > >   www.AjayOnLine.us > Email  ajay.shar...(a)rediffmail.com,    0091 94184 50899 > > AJAY SHARMA    02 October 2009 To attack editor of journal because of problems in editorial process is possible. But to attack editor of journal because of their rejection is inappropriate. |