Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG subtraction of 8th Class mathematics.
in [Relativity]
|
From: tomy tomy on 14 Nov 2009 10:27 On Nov 14, 7:21 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > "ajay" <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:cf149bef-2239-4ef2-9d3b-ea01cbd801e7(a)h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com... > > > > > > > On Nov 14, 3:33 am, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > > wrote: > >> On Nov 13, 4:34 pm, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> > "tomy tomy" <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > >> > Did you even read what he said? No. If you had you'd know better > > >> > > It is incorrect even student of 8th class knows. Dr Gordon W.F. > >> > > Drake should know in LHS is subtracted from LHS. > > >> > Then you are not even up to 8th grade standard .. You have no right to > >> > be a > >> > teacher. > > >> > > WHAT ELSE PROOF IS REQUIRED. > > >> > Show me WHERE Dr Drake did what you claimed. I have read his letter. > >> > Have > >> > you read what Drake actually wrote? or are you believing the nutcase > >> > Ajay? > > >> I suspect "tomy tomy" and "zimdoo zimdoo" are sock puppets for ajay > >> sharma. THey are all gmail accounts by illiterates. > > > 00000000000000000000000000000000 > > > I AM TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER. I TEACH SUCH THINGS TO STUDENTS AS > > MY PROFESSION. > > > Dr Gordon W.F. Drake subtracted 8th class > > level equations wrongly. He has quoted two equations, > > Subtraction > > hf* = Mc2 + hf/A (1) > > hf* = Mc2 + hf (2) > > > > --------------------------------- > > 0 = 0 + hf ( 1/A 1) > >> or A =1 (3) > > > But according to Editor, PRA, Dr Gordon W F Drake, eq.(3) is > > incorrect and correct result is in eq.(4) i.e. > > Difference in eq.(2) and eq.(1) = hf (1/A 1) = Net > > energy (4) > > Did you even read what he said? No. If you had you'd know better > > It is incorrect even student of 8th class knows. Dr Gordon W.F. > > Drake should know in LHS is subtracted from LHS. > > IT IS THE BIGGEST PROOF THAT DR DRAKE HAS DONE 8TH CLASS MATH. > > When this discussion is worldwide he should come and tell world what > > he knows. > > He is wrong so he is hidden in the shed. > > Only culprits hide themselves. > > Here is Dr Drake ALL TIME culprit of Science and American Physical > > Society. > > > Tomytomy > > BAHAHAHA ,... Ajay is TomyTomy, as suspected. You're a liar and a fraud. > You have no credibility.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee Foolish illeterate I am trained graduate teacher. I teach these things as profession everyday. Dr Drake has done 8TH class mathematics wrong. It is 100% correct as in eqautions quoted above. Dr Drake is such a blot on science and American Physical Society , who will NOT respond as he is correct. Dr Drake wants to remains in AMERICAL PHYSICAL SOCIETY SO HE IS SILENT THAT TRUTH WILL DIE A DAY. But he is foolish and selfish creature. OK Tomytomy
From: tomy tomy on 14 Nov 2009 10:42 On Nov 14, 8:01 pm, Jang Jin Hong <mo...(a)chol.com> wrote: > On 10ì4ì¼, ì¤ì 1ì34ë¶, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Editor of Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. Drake does WRONG > > subtraction of 8th Class mathematics. > > > It is done to save Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation of E =mc2 > > > Dr Drake is REQUESTED to justify himself as he is associated with > > world's most famous American Physical Society. > > > Email of Dr Gordon W.F. Drake:  p...(a)aps.org, 001-631-591-4000, > > Email of Ajay Sharma ajay.shar...(a)rediffmail.com,  0091 94184 50899 > > Website  www.AjayOnLine.us > > >                       Part I > > Ajay Sharma has sent paper to Editor Physical Review A, Dr Gordon W.F. > > Drake 17 March 2008 manuscript no. DQ10345A. > > > The title of the paper > >  Experimental and theoretical feasibilities of conversion factor > >   other than c2 in mass energy inter-conversion equation > >   by Ajay Sharma > > >    Wrong subtraction of 8th class mathematics in letter dated 19 > > June 2008 by > > Dr Gordon W.F. Drake > > > In letter dated 19 June 2008, wrote equations and then doing wrong > > subtraction of  8th standard  level. In my paper I have justified that > > Einstein's Sep. 1905 derivation of E =mc2, also gives > > E 'proportional to' mc2 > > or  E =Ac2m > > i.e. E =mc2 is generalized as E =Ac2m > > >  Dr Gordon W.F. Drakes perception of cyclic process in Email dated 19 > > June 2008 > > > 1.  A hydrogen atom of mass M in its ground state absorbs a > >   photon of frequency f and makes a transition > >   to the first excited state. > > > 2. The hydrogen atom of mass M* in its excited state is then > >   converted entirely into the energy of a high-frequency > >   photon of frequency f*. > >  Then > > >   hf* = M*c^2 = Mc^2 + hf/A. > >   hf* = Mc2 + hf/ > > A.                             (1) > > > 3. The high frequency photon is now passed through a machine > >   that converts it back into a hydrogen atom in its ground > >   state with mass M plus a low-frequency photon of > >   frequency f. > > >    hf* =Mc2 + > > hf > > (2) > > > Subtraction by Editor Gordon W.F.Drake of eq.(1) and eq.(2) > > >    hf* = Mc2 + hf/A > >    hf* =Mc2 + hf > >    --------------------------- > > Difference = hf/A â hf = hf (1/A-1) > > (3) > > and interpreted it. > > >  WRONG, 8th class subtraction by Editor Dr W.F. Drake. > > >  Dr Drake has forgotten the basic definition of equation that it has > > LHS and RHS. Further basic rule which is taught to 8th class student > > is while subtraction is that LHS of one equation is subtracted from > > LHS from second equation. RHS of one equation is subtracted from the > > second equation. > > > Mistake of Dr Drake:  Dr Drake did not subtract LHS of eq.(1)  from > > LHS of eq.(2), which is absolutely wrong. > > Correct version is > >     hf* = Mc2 + hf/A > >     hf* = Mc2 + hf > >    --------------------------- > >    0 = hf/A â hf = hf (1/A-1) or A =1           (4) > > LHS is subtracted from LHS, (hf* - hf* = 0) and RHS is subtracted from > > RHS (hf/A â hf). > > As the Left Hand Sides of both the equations are equal, hence the > > difference is zero. > > Thus Dr Drake applied 8th class mathematics incorrectly. > > >                    Part II > > >   What was Drakes' motive behind remarks? > > > Ajay Sharma in paper manuscript DQ10345A > > > Experimental and theoretical feasibilities of conversion factor > >   other than c2 in mass energy inter-conversion equation > > > has generalized  E = mc2  to E =Ac2m on the basis concrete theoretical > > and experimental evidences. > > >      Now Editor Dr Gordon W.F. Drake, wanted to prove this > > generalization is wrong and he invented own mechanism for this. > > But in the process he proved, that he did 8th class mathematics WRONG. > > > Thus Dr Drake is wrong, and generalization of E=mc2 to E =Ac2m is > > correct. > > >  The theme of Einstein's paper of Sep. 1905 of E = mc2 > > > (i) Einstein's Sep.1905, derivation of E = mc2 also predicts that > >           E 'proportional to'  mc2. > > The reason for above deduction is that Einstein derived ïE=ïmc2 under > > SPECIAL CONDITIONS, and under GENERAL CONDITIONS the result, > > >       E 'proportional to'  mc2  or  E > > =Ac2m              (5) > > > It is justified by Ajay Sharma in manuscript DQ10345A. > > >   What is meant by Special Conditions in Einstein's Sep. 1905 > > derivation? > > > In Einstein's derivation of E=mc2 of Sep. 1905 there are four > > variables and Einstein took suitable values of variables. This > > derivation involves emission of light energy by luminous body. > > (a) Luminous body under consideration emits only TWO waves. > > (b) Luminous body emits two waves of EQAUL magnitudes. > > (c) Two waves are emitted by body in exactly opposite directions (ï¦ = > > 0 and ï¦ =180). > > > (d) Einstein has taken velocity in classical region (v<<c and applied > > binomial theorem). > > > Under the Special or handpicked conditions, Einstein derived > > >       L = > > mc2                               (6) > > > where L is light energy emitted by body. Then Einstein replaced L by E > > to get > > >       E = > > mc2                                (7) > > > What is meant by General Conditions in Einstein's derivation? > > > The conditions other than taken by Einstein are called General > > conditions. For example, > > > (A) The body emits LARGE NUMBER of light waves. > > (B) The waves emitted are of DIFFERENT MAGNITUDES. > > (C) Body emits waves at DIFFERENT ANGLES. > > > (D)  Light emitting body may be at rest. > > > Under the General or handpicked conditions, Einstein derived (typical > > calculations) > > >  L = mc2/1141 = 0.000876mc2 > > (8) > >  L  'proportional to'  mc2 > > As above, > > E  'proportional to'  mc2    or   E =Ac2m. > > (5) > > > Then, E =Ac2m. is applied in various cases. > >  For further information visit > > >   www.AjayOnLine.us > > Email  ajay.shar...(a)rediffmail.com,    0091 94184 50899 > > > AJAY SHARMA    02 October 2009 > > To attack editor of journal because of problems in editorial process > is possible. > But to attack editor of journal because of their rejection is > inappropriate.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -------------------- If Editor Like Dr Drake (AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, New York) does 8th class subtraction wrong, then what author can do. It has happened with Ajay Sharma. TOMYTOMY
From: Robert Higgins on 19 Nov 2009 05:56 On Nov 18, 8:39 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: <snipped endless whiny-like-a-girl rant> Let's try this again. You claim to be an "instructor" or "teacher" of some sort. At what level do you teach? (e.g., grade school, middle school, high school, community college, 4- year college, graduate school)
From: tomy tomy on 19 Nov 2009 09:35 On Nov 19, 3:56 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 18, 8:39 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > <snipped endless whiny-like-a-girl rant> > > Let's try this again. > You claim to be an "instructor" or "teacher" of some sort. At what > level do you teach? > (e.g., grade school, middle school, high school, community college, 4- > year college, graduate school) -------------- I teach Math and science upto 10th class. Dr Drake has done 8th class subtraction wrong. AM TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER. I TEACH SUCH THINGS TO STUDENTS AS MY PROFESSION. Again read Dr Gordon W.F. Drake subtracted 8th class level equations wrongly. He has quoted two equations, Subtraction hf* = Mc2 + hf/A (1) hf* = Mc2 + hf (2) --------------------------------- 0 = 0 + hf ( 1/A 1) > or A =1 (3) But according to Editor, PRA, Dr Gordon W F Drake, eq.(3) is incorrect and correct result is in eq.(4) i.e. Difference in eq.(2) and eq.(1) = hf (1/A 1) = Net energy (4) Did you even read what he said? No. If you had you'd know better It is incorrect even student of 8th class knows. Dr Gordon W.F. Drake should know in LHS is subtracted from LHS. IT IS THE BIGGEST PROOF THAT DR DRAKE HAS DONE 8TH CLASS MATH. When this discussion is worldwide he should come and tell world what he knows. He is wrong so he is hidden in the shed. Unless OFFICIALS OF AMERICAN PHYSICS force him he not come out. TOMYTOMY
From: tomy tomy on 19 Nov 2009 20:44
On Nov 19, 7:35 pm, tomy tomy <tomytomy...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Nov 19, 3:56 pm, Robert Higgins <robert_higgins...(a)hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Nov 18, 8:39 pm, ajay <ajayonline...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > <snipped endless whiny-like-a-girl rant> > > > Let's try this again. > > You claim to be an "instructor" or "teacher" of some sort. At what > > level do you teach? > > (e.g., grade school, middle school, high school, community college, 4- > > year college, graduate school) > > -------------- > > I teach Math and science upto 10th class. > Dr Drake has done 8th class subtraction wrong. > > AM TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER. I TEACH SUCH THINGS TO STUDENTS AS > MY PROFESSION. > Again read > > Dr Gordon W.F. Drake subtracted 8th class > level equations wrongly. He has quoted two equations, > Subtraction > > hf* = Mc2 + hf/A (1) > hf* = Mc2 + hf (2) > > --------------------------------- > 0 = 0 + hf ( 1/A 1) > > > or A =1 (3) > > But according to Editor, PRA, Dr Gordon W F Drake, eq.(3) is > incorrect and correct result is in eq.(4) i.e. > Difference in eq.(2) and eq.(1) = hf (1/A 1) = Net > energy (4) > Did you even read what he said? No. If you had you'd know better > It is incorrect even student of 8th class knows. Dr Gordon W.F. > Drake should know in LHS is subtracted from LHS. > IT IS THE BIGGEST PROOF THAT DR DRAKE HAS DONE 8TH CLASS MATH. > When this discussion is worldwide he should come and tell world what > he knows. > He is wrong so he is hidden in the shed. > > Unless OFFICIALS OF AMERICAN PHYSICS force him he not come out. > > TOMYTOMY -------- I teach Math and science upto 10th class. Dr Drake has done 8th class subtraction wrong. AM TRAINED GRADUATE TEACHER. I TEACH SUCH THINGS TO STUDENTS AS MY PROFESSION. Again read Dr Gordon W.F. Drake subtracted 8th class level equations wrongly. He has quoted two equations, Subtraction hf* = Mc2 + hf/A (1) hf* = Mc2 + hf (2) --------------------------------- 0 = 0 + hf ( 1/A 1) > or A =1 (3) But according to Editor, PRA, Dr Gordon W F Drake, eq.(3) is incorrect and correct result is in eq.(4) i.e. Difference in eq.(2) and eq.(1) = hf (1/A 1) = Net energy (4) Did you even read what he said? No. If you had you'd know better It is incorrect even student of 8th class knows. Dr Gordon W.F. Drake should know in LHS is subtracted from LHS. IT IS THE BIGGEST PROOF THAT DR DRAKE HAS DONE 8TH CLASS MATH. When this discussion is worldwide he should come and tell world what he knows. He is wrong so he is hidden in the shed. Unless OFFICIALS OF AMERICAN PHYSICS force him he not come out. TOMYTOMY |