Prev: Relative motion and the experts
Next: Hoovler the troll fucks Re a NEW analysis of The photon momentum formula
From: purple on 18 Jul 2010 00:50
On 7/17/2010 11:20 PM, BURT wrote:
> On Jul 17, 9:06 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jul 16, 2:10 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

[...]


>>> Weight prevents accelerating at light speed. But it can happen in
>>> weightlessness of freefall.
>>
>> You mean mass.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text
>
> Actually both mass and weight prevent something. Mass prevents
> reaching light speed while weight prevents changing or accelerating by
> light speed to reach light speed.

Were you expecting rational discussion from BURT?
From: BURT on 18 Jul 2010 01:10
On Jul 17, 9:50 pm, purple <pur...(a)colorme.com> wrote:
> On 7/17/2010 11:20 PM, BURT wrote:
>
> > On Jul 17, 9:06 pm, Don Stockbauer<donstockba...(a)hotmail.com>  wrote:
> >> On Jul 16, 2:10 pm, BURT<macromi...(a)yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >>> Weight prevents accelerating at light speed. But it can happen in
> >>> weightlessness of freefall.
>
> >> You mean mass.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text
>
> > Actually both mass and weight prevent something. Mass prevents
> > reaching light speed while weight prevents changing or accelerating by
> > light speed to reach light speed.
>
> Were you expecting rational discussion from BURT?

Acceleration is a second derivative that would make it possible to go
potentially infinite if weight of mass did not resist it.

Mitch Raemsch
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Relative motion and the experts
Next: Hoovler the troll fucks Re a NEW analysis of The photon momentum formula