From: BURT on 30 Jun 2010 17:37 If something begins to move and is weighted it sees an opposite motion of things around it with the weight in that direction. When the Earth turns the Sun crosses the sky in the opposite direction. This is relative motion. And weight for motion is resistance to change in motion. Mitch Raemsch
From: artful on 30 Jun 2010 19:10 On Jul 1, 7:37 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > If something begins to move and is weighted it sees an opposite motion > of things around it with the weight in that direction. When the Earth > turns the Sun crosses the sky in the opposite direction. This is > relative motion. And weight for motion is resistance to change in > motion. It doesn't need to be 'weighted' to have relative motion. Otherwise, yes, you've stated the obvious.
From: BURT on 1 Jul 2010 00:31 On Jun 30, 4:10 pm, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 1, 7:37 am, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > If something begins to move and is weighted it sees an opposite motion > > of things around it with the weight in that direction. When the Earth > > turns the Sun crosses the sky in the opposite direction. This is > > relative motion. And weight for motion is resistance to change in > > motion. > > It doesn't need to be 'weighted' to have relative motion. Otherwise, > yes, you've stated the obvious. But the obvious was never stated by Einstein. And I include weight as evidence of absolute motion creating the relative. Mitch Raemsch
|
Pages: 1 Prev: STEPHEN HAWKING FINALLY SEES THE LIGHT Next: Einstein and Detecting motion |