Electronics Design does it Again!
in [Design]
|
Prev: Which type of volatile RAM has the least duration of data remanence when power-offed?
Next: USB3.0 FD Design
From: John Larkin on 13 May 2010 11:19 http://electronicdesign.com/article/power/non_inverting_level_shifter_requires_only_one_op_amp_one_supply_voltage.aspx Such brilliance! How do they keep doing it? Sarcasm aside, he made a mistake. And we should take up a collection and buy Pease some grid paper. John
From: Joerg on 13 May 2010 11:45 John Larkin wrote: > > http://electronicdesign.com/article/power/non_inverting_level_shifter_requires_only_one_op_amp_one_supply_voltage.aspx > "Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for this address in a way that will never complete." Guess they want tracking cookies? > > Such brilliance! How do they keep doing it? > > Sarcasm aside, he made a mistake. > > And we should take up a collection and buy Pease some grid paper. > Bob made a mistake? Hard to believe, but can happen to anyone. Does he still have all those mini buses on his lot? -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
From: Spehro Pefhany on 13 May 2010 11:55 On Thu, 13 May 2010 08:19:22 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > > >http://electronicdesign.com/article/power/non_inverting_level_shifter_requires_only_one_op_amp_one_supply_voltage.aspx > > >Such brilliance! How do they keep doing it? > >Sarcasm aside, he made a mistake. > >And we should take up a collection and buy Pease some grid paper. > >John The article that links to is by a USSC summer student named Erik, not Bob Pease. Nominal gain is 0.75 so it's doing more (less?) than level shifting.
From: John Larkin on 13 May 2010 11:57 On Thu, 13 May 2010 08:45:17 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >John Larkin wrote: >> >> http://electronicdesign.com/article/power/non_inverting_level_shifter_requires_only_one_op_amp_one_supply_voltage.aspx >> > >"Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for >this address in a way that will never complete." > >Guess they want tracking cookies? > >> >> Such brilliance! How do they keep doing it? >> >> Sarcasm aside, he made a mistake. >> >> And we should take up a collection and buy Pease some grid paper. >> > >Bob made a mistake? Hard to believe, but can happen to anyone. Does he >still have all those mini buses on his lot? Try this one: http://electronicdesign.com/authors/author.aspx?author=3324 It's Matlin who made the mistake. Pease just drew another one of his hideous scribbles. Yes, lots of rusty VWs on his lawn and on the street. John
From: Joerg on 13 May 2010 12:02
John Larkin wrote: > On Thu, 13 May 2010 08:45:17 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> > wrote: > >> John Larkin wrote: >>> http://electronicdesign.com/article/power/non_inverting_level_shifter_requires_only_one_op_amp_one_supply_voltage.aspx >>> >> "Firefox has detected that the server is redirecting the request for >> this address in a way that will never complete." >> >> Guess they want tracking cookies? >> >>> Such brilliance! How do they keep doing it? >>> >>> Sarcasm aside, he made a mistake. >>> >>> And we should take up a collection and buy Pease some grid paper. >>> >> Bob made a mistake? Hard to believe, but can happen to anyone. Does he >> still have all those mini buses on his lot? > > Try this one: > > http://electronicdesign.com/authors/author.aspx?author=3324 > Same error message :-( I don't like tracking cookies. > It's Matlin who made the mistake. > > Pease just drew another one of his hideous scribbles. > > Yes, lots of rusty VWs on his lawn and on the street. > Sometimes I wonder how many "discussions" he and his wife have about that :-) -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM. |