From: John Larkin on
On Fri, 28 May 2010 18:39:10 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
<krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:

>On Fri, 28 May 2010 16:33:15 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
><zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message
>>news:ivj0065hunv7sf3nn7gbs8ksbiunkm3lev(a)4ax.com...
>>> He didn't tell you to measure it! ;-)
>>
>>Yeah, but until you measure it, couldn't it simultaneously be many different
>>voltages? Like how Schroedinger's cat is both dead and alive at the same time
>>until you actually go to look at it? :-)
>
>I thought he was hiring an engineer, not a physicist or philosopher.

"Five" would do just fine.

John

From: Michael A. Terrell on

Jamie wrote:
>
> John Larkin wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 27 May 2010 14:38:24 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> > <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>John Larkin wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Thu, 13 May 2010 09:23:56 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
> >>><zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:6r5ou5lcgjqv2cg8vbg1831506uqtmod4g(a)4ax.com...
> >>>>
> >>>>>Such brilliance! How do they keep doing it?
> >>>>
> >>>>A lot of graduating BSEEs today never really got that whole thing about
> >>>>superposition, I suspect? :-)
> >>>>
> >>>>Hmm... there might be a good interview question in there somewhere... "It's
> >>>>clear you can use an op-amp to sum an arbitrary number of inputs -- both with
> >>>>positive and negative gains -- but why is it that the vast majority of the
> >>>>time in an 'application example' you see people suggest only the inverting
> >>>>form?"
> >>>>
> >>>>Although I think it was Jim or someone who mentioned that these days some
> >>>>people don't even get past, "What's the approximate Vbe of any unremarkable
> >>>>transistor at reasonable currents?" :-)
> >>>
> >>>I like this as a test:
> >>>
> >>> +10V
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> c
> >>> +5V--------------b
> >>> e
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> 1K
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> gnd
> >>>
> >>>What's the base voltage?
> >>>
> >>>What's the base current?
> >>>
> >>>What's the emitter voltage?
> >>>
> >>>What's the collector current?
> >>>
> >>>What's the collector voltage?
> >>
> >>
> >> What type of transistor? NPN or PNP?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you for coming by to interview. Best of luck.
> >
> > John
> >
> >
> :)


Why are you smiling? Do you think he hires illiterates like you?


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: krw on
On Fri, 28 May 2010 17:01:01 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 28 May 2010 18:39:10 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz"
><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 28 May 2010 16:33:15 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
>><zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote in message
>>>news:ivj0065hunv7sf3nn7gbs8ksbiunkm3lev(a)4ax.com...
>>>> He didn't tell you to measure it! ;-)
>>>
>>>Yeah, but until you measure it, couldn't it simultaneously be many different
>>>voltages? Like how Schroedinger's cat is both dead and alive at the same time
>>>until you actually go to look at it? :-)
>>
>>I thought he was hiring an engineer, not a physicist or philosopher.
>
>"Five" would do just fine.

Spoilsport.
From: Michael A. Terrell on

"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 May 2010 19:13:05 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >John Larkin wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 28 May 2010 10:34:22 -0700, "Joel Koltner"
> >> <zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:9f7uv5purnraa511gl0cunsek4v96d2uvh(a)4ax.com...
> >> >> On Thu, 27 May 2010 14:38:24 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> >> >>> What type of transistor? NPN or PNP?
> >> >> Thank you for coming by to interview. Best of luck.
> >> >
> >> >No, no, John, your follow-up question is supposed to be about how one would go
> >> >about measuring the height of a building with a barometer, wherein you see
> >> >whether or not the many alternatives to the "intended" answer (e.g., "I go to
> >> >the buliding superintendent and tell him I'll give him this fancy new
> >> >barometer if he just tells me the height of the building") are sufficiently
> >> >entertaining or not. :-)
> >> >
> >> >There is sometimes a blurry line between "this is intended to be a
> >> >straighforward problem and you should make any reasonable assumptions
> >> >necessary" and "this is something of a trick question and you need to proceed
> >> >like a lawyer unraveling the tax code to have any hope of ascertaining the
> >> >answer we've deemed as correct."
> >> >
> >> >---Joel
> >>
> >> This is not a sit-down test. This is a thing I scribble and talk
> >> about. There is no intent to be tricky, but I need to know if the
> >> person understands fundamantals.
> >>
> >> I use this one too:
> >>
> >> +10V
> >> |
> >> |
> >> |
> >> R=1K
> >> |
> >> |
> >> +-------- A
> >> |
> >> |
> >> R=1K
> >> |
> >> |
> >> |
> >> gnd
> >>
> >> What's the voltage at "A" ?
> >>
> >> I'm not kidding. Lots of people don't know. They mumble about not
> >> remembering the equation.
> >>
> >> John
> >
> >
> > In theory, it is exactly +5 volts. If you use an old 1K ohm per volt
> >voltmeter to read it, it will be 4.5454545454545454545454545454545
> >volts. (give or take a few digits)
>
> He didn't tell you to measure it! ;-)


The engineer calculates it, the tech measures it.


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: YD on
Late at night, by candle light, "Joel Koltner"
<zapwireDASHgroups(a)yahoo.com> penned this immortal opus:

>"John Larkin" <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote in message
>news:9f7uv5purnraa511gl0cunsek4v96d2uvh(a)4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 27 May 2010 14:38:24 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
>>> What type of transistor? NPN or PNP?
>> Thank you for coming by to interview. Best of luck.
>
>No, no, John, your follow-up question is supposed to be about how one would go
>about measuring the height of a building with a barometer, wherein you see
>whether or not the many alternatives to the "intended" answer (e.g., "I go to
>the buliding superintendent and tell him I'll give him this fancy new
>barometer if he just tells me the height of the building") are sufficiently
>entertaining or not. :-)
>

Go to the top of the building with the barometer and a stopwatch. Drop
the barometer and start the stopwatch. You can figure the rest.

- YD.
--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.