From: Jim Thompson on
On Thu, 13 May 2010 13:52:17 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:56:44 -0500, John O'Flaherty
><quiasmox(a)yeeha.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 13 May 2010 09:45:57 -0700, John Larkin
>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:02:58 -0500, John O'Flaherty
>>><quiasmox(a)yeeha.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I see attenuation of 1/2 at the input, gain of 4 (3+1), and
>>>>attenuation of 1/2 at the output. LTSpice agrees, unless I made a
>>>>mistake.
>>>
>>>
>>>You did. You left out the pot and the cap.
>>
>>That wasn't a mistake, it was a choice. I believe the intention of the
>>circuit is to have that as an AC ground, that is, as an adjustable
>>reference voltage. Is the fact that the capacitor size wasn't
>>specified in the published circuit the mistake that you meant to point
>>out?
>
>My point was that the gain and the frequency response change as the
>offset pot is turned. Tacky.

That wasn't your original point. Your original point was to say the
gain was incorrectly stated.

>
>My other point is the Electronic Design will publish any old trivial
>junk to fill in space between the ads.
>
>John
>

True.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, CTO | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona 85048 Skype: Contacts Only | |
| Voice:(480)460-2350 Fax: Available upon request | Brass Rat |
| E-mail Icon at http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

The only thing bipartisan in this country is hypocrisy
From: Michael A. Terrell on

John Larkin wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 May 2010 14:04:25 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> >
> >John Larkin wrote:
> >>
> >> Pease just drew another one of his hideous scribbles.
> >>
> >> Yes, lots of rusty VWs on his lawn and on the street.
> >>
> >> John
> >
> >
> > Don't they have code enforcement out there? That would get you a
> >huge fine in a lot of states, or even jail time. Some try to claim they
> >are artists, but still end up in jail.
>
> We have street cleaning, once a week on each side of the street, and
> you'll get a ticket if the car is out. That's really about it.


A lot of places require any vehicle that isn't stored indoors to have
a tag and insurance to prevent people's yards from turning into
junkyards.


--
Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to
have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: John O'Flaherty on
On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:46:25 -0700 (PDT), George Herold
<gherold(a)teachspin.com> wrote:

>On May 13, 1:12�pm, John O'Flaherty <quias...(a)yeeha.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 13 May 2010 09:45:57 -0700, John Larkin
>>
>> <jjlar...(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>> >On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:02:58 -0500, John O'Flaherty
>> ><quias...(a)yeeha.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>I see attenuation of 1/2 at the input, gain of 4 (3+1), and
>> >>attenuation of 1/2 at the output. LTSpice agrees, unless I made a
>> >>mistake.
>>
>> >You did. You left out the pot and the cap.
>>
>> Here's the version with pot and cap, working about as described:
>
>Yup, I slapped it onto a white proto-board to see if I was doing
>something silly. I works fine!

Yes. It's not really clever, and it doesn't go to DC, but it works
fine.

--
John
From: John Larkin on
On Thu, 13 May 2010 18:28:03 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
<mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:

>
>John Larkin wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 13 May 2010 14:04:25 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell"
>> <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >John Larkin wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Pease just drew another one of his hideous scribbles.
>> >>
>> >> Yes, lots of rusty VWs on his lawn and on the street.
>> >>
>> >> John
>> >
>> >
>> > Don't they have code enforcement out there? That would get you a
>> >huge fine in a lot of states, or even jail time. Some try to claim they
>> >are artists, but still end up in jail.
>>
>> We have street cleaning, once a week on each side of the street, and
>> you'll get a ticket if the car is out. That's really about it.
>
>
> A lot of places require any vehicle that isn't stored indoors to have
>a tag and insurance to prevent people's yards from turning into
>junkyards.

Some places, like tony parts of Long Island, don't allow any vehicle
to be parked on the street. That's to keep the riff-raff out of posh
neighborhoods and off "our" beaches and parks. Some even forbid
parking a vehicle in sight on your own property.

In theory a car can't be parked here in the same place for more than
72 hours, but that's not much enforced. The weekly street cleaning
pretty much takes care of that. I guess Pease shuffles his rusty VWs
occasionally.

John

From: John O'Flaherty on
On Thu, 13 May 2010 13:52:17 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:56:44 -0500, John O'Flaherty
><quiasmox(a)yeeha.com> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 13 May 2010 09:45:57 -0700, John Larkin
>><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 13 May 2010 11:02:58 -0500, John O'Flaherty
>>><quiasmox(a)yeeha.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I see attenuation of 1/2 at the input, gain of 4 (3+1), and
>>>>attenuation of 1/2 at the output. LTSpice agrees, unless I made a
>>>>mistake.
>>>
>>>
>>>You did. You left out the pot and the cap.
>>
>>That wasn't a mistake, it was a choice. I believe the intention of the
>>circuit is to have that as an AC ground, that is, as an adjustable
>>reference voltage. Is the fact that the capacitor size wasn't
>>specified in the published circuit the mistake that you meant to point
>>out?
>
>My point was that the gain and the frequency response change as the
>offset pot is turned. Tacky.

If the capacitor is chosen to put the 3 dB point well below the lowest
frequency used, the gain for frequencies of interest doesn't change
with the pot setting.

>My other point is the Electronic Design will publish any old trivial
>junk to fill in space between the ads.
>
>John
>

--
John