From: Maxim on 1 Nov 2005 05:57 We have got much more requests then expected, which, of course makes us happy, but will also take some time to generate the licenses and send them out. We expect to start sending out the licenses today and finish it within 3-4 days. Max EPIM Team MLC wrote: > lunedì 31 ottobre 2005 cdubea(a)movingpart.com ha scritto: > > > Yeah I assumed they were talking 12:00 noon on the 31st, not 23:59:59. > > > It's been over 5 hours and I've not received my authorization code. > > Not particularly encouraging sign. > > IIRC it should arrive in 48 hours. > > -- > Maria Luisa C - 31/10/2005 21.15.03 > The art of medicine consists in amusing the patient > while nature cures the disease. Voltaire > -
From: cdubea on 1 Nov 2005 09:44 Was it ever valid? Has anyone received an authorization code? It's been 24hours since I filled out the form and no response. I'm glad I used a spamgourmet disposable e-mail address as this is starting to smell of a e-mail address harvest scheme.
From: Jan on 1 Nov 2005 20:36 In article <1130856280.323887.198310(a)g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, cdubea(a)movingpart.com says... > Was it ever valid? Has anyone received an authorization code? > > It's been 24hours since I filled out the form and no response. > > I'm glad I used a spamgourmet disposable e-mail address as this is > starting to smell of a e-mail address harvest scheme. > > I just got mine at 3:37 p.m. and it works. -- Cheers! Jan
From: Maxim on 2 Nov 2005 03:53 We have got over 14,000 requests for keys. Some of them are with anti-spam, which required manual input on our part. We do not have the possibility to send keys to those clients. So you might be missing the key exactly because of spamgourmet address. cdubea(a)movingpart.com wrote: > Was it ever valid? Has anyone received an authorization code? > > It's been 24hours since I filled out the form and no response. > > I'm glad I used a spamgourmet disposable e-mail address as this is > starting to smell of a e-mail address harvest scheme. Max EPIM Team
From: GlintingHedgehog on 2 Nov 2005 05:58
In article <1130921632.111135.196290(a)g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, epiminfo(a)essentialpim.com says... > We have got over 14,000 requests for keys. Some of them are with > anti-spam, which required manual input on our part. We do not have the > possibility to send keys to those clients. Erm...why? A spamgourmet address is simply an email address that is routed via the spamgourmet service - why would it require manual input on your part? Why would you not be able to send a key to those using spamgourmet? (I can see that there might be a problem if it was one of those you- must-validate-your-address type anti-spam services, but that's not what spamgourmet does.) > So you might be missing the key exactly because of spamgourmet address. I got my key - to a spamgourmet address - last night. -- Hedgehog |