Fermat's "Last" Theorem Disproved?
in [Math]
|
Prev: 'Relativistic' "Doppler" shift
Next: Intersection of Complex Submanifolds (Incl. Self-Int.) is positive
From: Virgil on 4 Aug 2010 15:45 In article <5c11859f-a8b9-46b9-ac9a-1b734f03c84b(a)u26g2000yqu.googlegroups.com>, cjcountess <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Virgil > > For your information I am a mam, and it is his grace, "Mr Countess" is > RIGHT. If you are indeed a "mam", as you have indicated, then "Mr" anything would be inappropriate. Also,purely mathematical numbers are free of any and all units. While physics may differ, this is not a physics NG.
From: James Waldby on 4 Aug 2010 16:11 On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 11:31:21 -0700, cjcountess wrote: > For your information I am a mam, and it is his grace, "Mr Countess" is > RIGHT. But, Countess, all mam's are women. You are a mixed up dude. Numerous misspellings appear in what you wrote. Don't you have a spellchecker? > ... interpretaed ... tecnicaly ... intergers ... Fermats ... > nuber theory ... interger ... interger ... transended > ... transends ... analisis ... [and "unite" that should be "unit", repeatedly in previous posts] Of course, you might not care about misspellings. That is your privilege; there are no laws against looking stupid. > I will explain in more detail later. > There is a new sheriff in town and he 's bringing the new law You seem to misunderstand mathematics and to know nothing of what mathematics is about. Have you given any thought to what people have been telling you? -- jiw
From: spudnik on 4 Aug 2010 20:59 that's kind-of a British thing, to leave commas to the imagination of the reader, perhaps because that's how Eliz. does it, or some thing. > If every sentence you > write has 5 commas in it, then it's guaranteed that your thus: the perfect box problem missed one of the lengths, and I couldn't "see" what you meant by a "4d brick." http://unsolvedproblems.org/ --les ducs d'oil! http://tarpley.net --Light, A History! http://wlym.com
From: spudnik on 4 Aug 2010 21:06 do you know, "picqayune?..." not so sure of the spelling, but the dood is Dutch, I think, and spellchekcers are a sure way to lose one's ability to spell. otherwise, he seems to be hoisting his own petard to various heights of "not even wrongsville." incidentally, the perfect box problem is of the same sort, as le theoreme <<dernier>> de Fermatttt, and obviously both Diophantine and geometrically dimensional. > You seem to misunderstand mathematics and to know nothing of what > mathematics is about. thus: that's kind-of a British thing, to leave commas to the imagination of the reader, perhaps because that's how Eliz. does it, or some thing. > If every sentence you > write has 5 commas in it, then it's guaranteed that your thus: the perfect box problem missed one of the lengths, but I couldn't see what you meant by a "4d brick." http://unsolvedproblems.org/ --les ducs d'oil! http://tarpley.net --Light, A History! http://wlym.com
From: porky_pig_jr on 5 Aug 2010 15:44
> E=mc^2 lets us know that even thoughts that are composed of energy > have dimensions. The dimensions of my thoughts is 2 to the power of the cardinality of dimensions of your thoughts. > > There is a new sheriff in town and he 's bringing the new law > > Conrad J Countess Bum! Bum! You're dead. |