From: spudnik on
the "dimensionality," or at leat the base
of digitization, has always been implicit
to le theorem <<derniere>> de Fermatttt, as
well as to les courbes de ... duh.

> > no three positive integers  a, b,
> > and c can satisfy the equation an + bn = cn
> > for any integer value of n greater than two.

thus:
where did that PDF go, of M&M's paper,
where they show the soi-dissant "null resultage?..." anyway,
I thank the dood that posted it.

thus:
I've been saying thus-like for years,
after reading of it apres XXXValdez:
Typically, there are enough microbes in the ocean to consume half of
any oil spilled in a month or two, says Howarth. Such microbes have
been found in every ocean of the world sampled, from the Arctic to
Antarctica. But there are reasons to think that the process may occur
more quickly in the Gulf than in other oceans.

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/george-bush-the-unauthorized-biography/chapter-8-the-permian-basin-gang/

--Light, A History!
http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html
From: cjcountess on
PROOF of DIMENSIONALITY



Take the numbers 3, 4, and 5, and square them as 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2,
and you have 9 + 16 = 25.

This turns out to be correct, but why 3^2 + 4^2 does not = 7^2 why
not ?

I say that it is because these are not non dimensional integers but
dimensional geometric unites related to Pythagorean theorem and this
is how you can tell.

Take each of the 3 numbers and represent them with things, preferably
uniform objects such as spheres , triangles, or square blocks, they
should be all the same and symmetrical.

Now group each set of unites ‘objects” in order of 3x3, 4x4 and 5x5.

As you will notice, they form three squares representative of a
Pythagorean triangle.

Is not this evidence that these came from geometry as certainly
geometry came from them, for how can something without dimensions give
rise to something with dimensions?


Conrad J Countess
From: Virgil on
In article
<3ac2ba32-b881-4797-bd90-f7445f6b2d6c(a)c10g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>,
cjcountess <cjcountess(a)yahoo.com> wrote:

> PROOF of DIMENSIONALITY
>
>
>
> Take the numbers 3, 4, and 5, and square them as 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2,
> and you have 9 + 16 = 25.
>
> This turns out to be correct, but why 3^2 + 4^2 does not = 7^2 why
> not ?

Because of the way that addition and multiplication of natural numbers
( and more generally real numbers) are requred to work together in order
to provide a useful arithmetic.
>
> I say that it is because these are not non dimensional integers but
> dimensional geometric unites related to Pythagorean theorem and this
> is how you can tell.

You say wrongly. When using only positive integers, one need not look
any further than counting for one's model. No dimensions are needed.
>
> Take each of the 3 numbers and represent them with things, preferably
> uniform objects such as spheres , triangles, or square blocks, they
> should be all the same and symmetrical.

The whole point of numbers is that they do not have any "things"
necessarily attached to them, not are they necessarily attached to any
sort of "things".

So any attempt to constrain numbers in the way you suggest is totally
inappropriate and foolish.
>
> Now group each set of unites �objects� in order of 3x3, 4x4 and 5x5.
>
> As you will notice, they form three squares representative of a
> Pythagorean triangle.
>
> Is not this evidence that these came from geometry as certainly
> geometry came from them, for how can something without dimensions give
> rise to something with dimensions?

NO!
>
>
> Conrad J Countess
From: spudnik on
there are two 3d versions of the pythag.thm.,
each with different dimensional attributes.

iff you don't study Fermat's numbertheorie,
you're up Shitz Creek without a paddle; however,
it is better to start with his "reconstruction
of Euclid's porisms," although they are just planar
(synthetic geometry: see "Geometrical Fragments,"
belowsville .-)

> NO!

thus:
and, the other half d'oil evaporates, as has
been shown of late (again) in the newspapers. Congress and
the Administration are a bit behind, in using Iran Oil's
big blow-out in the Gulf, to leverage BP's cap&trade nostrum;
eh?

a-yup:
Such microbes have
been found in every ocean of the world sampled, from the Arctic to
Antarctica. But there are reasons to think that the process may occur
more quickly in the Gulf than in other oceans.

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/

--Light, A History!
http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html
From: spudnik on
also, if you stare at Hipparchus' "lunes proof"
of the pythag.thm., you'll get it; now,
can it be applied to the 3d theorems.

yeah, dood; prove a theorem!

thus: <stuff about Zionosphere/WWx, redacted>
here are some speeches about the British World Wars,
collected in one book on http://tarpley.net:
How the Venetian System Was Transplanted Into England
New Federalist, June 3, 1996

The British Empire Bid for Undisputed World Domination, 1850-1870
Schiller Institute Food For Peace Conference, Chicago, February 22-23,
1992

Lord Palmerston’s Multicultural Human Zoo
ICLC Conference, February 20, 1994

King Edward VII: Evil Demiurge of the Triple Entente and World War 1
ICLC Conference, February, 1995

Sir Edward Grey Turned Sarajevo Crisis Into War
Printed in The American Almanac, March, 1995

The Versailles Thesis: The Roots of WWI, and WWII
Conference Speech by Webster Tarpley, Schiller Institute Food
For Peace Conference, Chicago, Illinois, February 22-23, 1992.

The Versailles Treaty: The War Guilt Clause
Printed in the American Almanac, March, 1995

British Financial Warfare: 1929; 1931-33;
How The City Of London Created The Great Depression

thus: we're all einsteinians, if not fanatic; you are the one,
who insists upon his reification of the corpuscle,
a willy-nilly interpretation of "quantum
of light," vis-a-vu Planck's great idea and
mere electronic traces of a photo-electrical effect.... well,
his and Infeld's acoustic fridge was pretty cool!

thus: there're two 3d versions of the pythag.thm.,
each with different dimensional attributes.
iff you don't study Fermat's numbertheorie,
you're up Shitz Creek without a paddle; however,
it is better to start with his "reconstruction
of Euclid's porisms," although they are just planar
(synthetic geometry: see "Geometrical Fragments,"
belowsville .-)

thus: and, the other half d'oil evaporates, as has
been shown of late (again) in the newspapers. Congress and
the Administration are a bit behind, in using Iran Oil's
big blow-out in the Gulf, to leverage BP's cap&trade nostrum;
eh?

a-yup: Such microbes have
been found in every ocean of the world sampled, from the Arctic to
Antarctica. But there are reasons to think that the process may occur
more quickly in the Gulf than in other oceans.

--les ducs d'oil!
http://tarpley.net/online-books/

--Light, A History!
http://wlym.com/~animations/fermat/index.html