Ferrite Inductor Tolerance
in [Design]
|
From: Archimedes' Lever on 14 Jun 2010 21:57 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:26:56 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:01:51 -0700, John Larkin ><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: > >>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:15:09 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" >><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:51:39 -0700, Archimedes' Lever >>><OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 03:10:01 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell" >>>><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:50:22 -0700, Archimedes' Lever >>>>>> <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:43:31 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> >>>>>> >wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote: >>>>>> >>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:03 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>>> Archimedes' Lever wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:24:21 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> >>>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, and how do you suppose you get an "original design" into production >>>>>> >>>>>> without an ECO? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> You must also be an acronymical retard as well. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> There is a difference between a design release and a change order of an >>>>>> >>>>> existing design. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>> So you guys release new designs without due ECO process? I sure hope you >>>>>> >>>> don't design anything that can harm people. >>>>>> >>> >>>>>> >>> AlwaysWrong doesn't design anything, so no he doesn't release ECOs. Everyone >>>>>> >>> else here who does, uses an ECO process, certainly. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>Yup. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >>Maybe they have a different release process for new stuff even though it >>>>>> >>typically _changes_ a product from previous to next generation. Having >>>>>> >>two different release processes doesn't strike me as particularly smart, >>>>>> >>but who knows :-) >>>>>> > >>>>>> > ECO is NOT for a "release", and not all releases are next gen designs >>>>>> >of previous work, idiot. >>>>>> >>>>>> AlwaysWrong is , *SURPRISE*, wrong again. It is an engineering change to the >>>>>> database so an Engineering Change Order is necessary. It's really that >>>>>> simple, AlwaysWrong. You should know simple, by mirror. >>>>>> >>>>>> > Two proofs that you are chasing your own tail. >>>>>> >>>>>> DimBulb just can't avoid the hind-end references. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If his parents had read that last ECO, dimmie would have been born >>>>>human. :( >>>> >>>> Said the utter retard that claims to be such a patriot, yet makes >>>>stupid remarks like this about people. >>> >>>Wow! You're reaching for that one DimBulb! >>> >>>> You are not a patriot, dumbfuck, you are the antithesis of patriotism. >>> >>>...and you say that you're a Christian! Yikes! >> >>That's the scary part. Does he abuse people and say s**t and f**k >>every other word when he's in Church? > >...and lie. Williams has to be a pig or the son of a pig. No other personality type makes so many false accusations.
From: Joerg on 14 Jun 2010 21:58 Mr.Eko wrote: > On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:43:41 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> > wrote: > >> Mr.Eko wrote: >>> On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:12:15 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> that would be hardcore un-Christian. >>> >>> That remark itself is 'un-Christian' then. >>> >>> In other words, despite your claims, you wouldn't know what is or is >>> not 'Christian'. If you did, you would not be making such claims at all. >>> >> Ephesians 4:29 is quite clear: "Do not let any unwholesome talk come out >> of your mouth ...". Matthew 5:22 is Jesus himself saying "But anyone who >> says 'You fool!' will be in danger of the fire of hell". (meant to his >> brethren or fellow citizens) > > un-Christian = 'You fool!' > > You are guilty of what you finger point. How can you be blind to that? Care to quote? >> Not that anyone who has said that or a..beep or whatever must go >> straight to hell. There is a way out. > > Let's just say that IF Jeffry Dahmer was indeed SINCERE in his > repentance, he will get to go to heaven. If he was not sincere, and that > is what I am betting, he too will find himself standing naked before > Christ on Judgement Day. > Yup. > You too will be there, UNLESS repentance is one of the very last things > you do, and it must be sincere. > I know. > I know what the last words on my lips are going to be, if I have > anything to say about it. > >> One can ask forgiveness. But that >> must be in front of God and of the person that has been insulted. > > No such rule. > Oh yeah. Read up on it, you have the book. If you can't find it I'll look it up for you. >> Simple, really, but harder to do than it may sound. And yeah, I had to >> do that myself. > > You have never been 'in front of God'. > You can be in front of Him every day. And even more so at the communion rail. And one shall not partake in communion light-heartedly as that requires forgiveness, repentance and the vow to do better and not plan hurling insults or whatever again right after church. Or after firing up the PC next time ;-) >> Not for cursing someone but other things. In the end it >> doesn't matter what it is, a sin is a sin. > > And there is no escape and there are no rules save one, and He and I > already have a relationship that you nor any of your stupid horseshit ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ You dig what I mean? > will ever be able to put asunder. You dig, boy? > > Do you even know who Mr Eko is? I guess I know who you are :-) -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
From: krw on 14 Jun 2010 23:17 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:57:05 -0700, Archimedes' Lever <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:26:56 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" ><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: > >>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:01:51 -0700, John Larkin >><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >> >>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:15:09 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" >>><krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >>> >>>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 04:51:39 -0700, Archimedes' Lever >>>><OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >>>> >>>>>On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 03:10:01 -0400, "Michael A. Terrell" >>>>><mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:50:22 -0700, Archimedes' Lever >>>>>>> <OneBigLever(a)InfiniteSeries.Org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:43:31 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> >>>>>>> >wrote: >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote: >>>>>>> >>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:03 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>> Archimedes' Lever wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:24:21 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> >>>>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Oh, and how do you suppose you get an "original design" into production >>>>>>> >>>>>> without an ECO? >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> You must also be an acronymical retard as well. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> There is a difference between a design release and a change order of an >>>>>>> >>>>> existing design. >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>> So you guys release new designs without due ECO process? I sure hope you >>>>>>> >>>> don't design anything that can harm people. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> AlwaysWrong doesn't design anything, so no he doesn't release ECOs. Everyone >>>>>>> >>> else here who does, uses an ECO process, certainly. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>Yup. >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >>Maybe they have a different release process for new stuff even though it >>>>>>> >>typically _changes_ a product from previous to next generation. Having >>>>>>> >>two different release processes doesn't strike me as particularly smart, >>>>>>> >>but who knows :-) >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > ECO is NOT for a "release", and not all releases are next gen designs >>>>>>> >of previous work, idiot. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> AlwaysWrong is , *SURPRISE*, wrong again. It is an engineering change to the >>>>>>> database so an Engineering Change Order is necessary. It's really that >>>>>>> simple, AlwaysWrong. You should know simple, by mirror. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Two proofs that you are chasing your own tail. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> DimBulb just can't avoid the hind-end references. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> If his parents had read that last ECO, dimmie would have been born >>>>>>human. :( >>>>> >>>>> Said the utter retard that claims to be such a patriot, yet makes >>>>>stupid remarks like this about people. >>>> >>>>Wow! You're reaching for that one DimBulb! >>>> >>>>> You are not a patriot, dumbfuck, you are the antithesis of patriotism. >>>> >>>>...and you say that you're a Christian! Yikes! >>> >>>That's the scary part. Does he abuse people and say s**t and f**k >>>every other word when he's in Church? >> >>...and lie. > > Williams has to be a pig or the son of a pig. No, AlwaysWrong, I am not your brother. <shudder> >No other personality type makes so many false accusations. Nothing false about it, AlwaysWrong.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 14 Jun 2010 23:58 On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:58:34 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >Care to quote? > Calling someone 'un-Christian'. You really are blind.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 15 Jun 2010 00:01
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 18:58:34 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > And even more so at the communion >rail. Bwuahahahahahahah! What about that part about behind your own door? One does not need communion. That is a pagan ritual, at best. Jesus never performed any ritualistic behaviors. He does not fault those that are not of *your* particular style of Christianity. |