Ferrite Inductor Tolerance
in [Design]
|
From: Archimedes' Lever on 13 Jun 2010 16:37 On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:56:04 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >It's hard to buy surface-mount NTC caps in reasonable quantities. Form the leads of the beaded style into 'stands' for surface mounting. Yes, it then becomes a hand installed part. Same way we used to 'surface mount' axial leaded glass diodes before the little barrel SMDs came out.
From: Joerg on 13 Jun 2010 17:08 Archimedes' Lever wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:24:21 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> > wrote: > >> Oh, and how do you suppose you get an "original design" into production >> without an ECO? > > > You must also be an acronymical retard as well. > > There is a difference between a design release and a change order of an > existing design. > So you guys release new designs without due ECO process? I sure hope you don't design anything that can harm people. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
From: krw on 13 Jun 2010 17:30 On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:03 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: >Archimedes' Lever wrote: >> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:24:21 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> >> wrote: >> >>> Oh, and how do you suppose you get an "original design" into production >>> without an ECO? >> >> >> You must also be an acronymical retard as well. >> >> There is a difference between a design release and a change order of an >> existing design. >> > >So you guys release new designs without due ECO process? I sure hope you >don't design anything that can harm people. AlwaysWrong doesn't design anything, so no he doesn't release ECOs. Everyone else here who does, uses an ECO process, certainly.
From: Joerg on 13 Jun 2010 17:43 krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz wrote: > On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:03 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >> Archimedes' Lever wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:24:21 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Oh, and how do you suppose you get an "original design" into production >>>> without an ECO? >>> >>> You must also be an acronymical retard as well. >>> >>> There is a difference between a design release and a change order of an >>> existing design. >>> >> So you guys release new designs without due ECO process? I sure hope you >> don't design anything that can harm people. > > AlwaysWrong doesn't design anything, so no he doesn't release ECOs. Everyone > else here who does, uses an ECO process, certainly. Yup. Maybe they have a different release process for new stuff even though it typically _changes_ a product from previous to next generation. Having two different release processes doesn't strike me as particularly smart, but who knows :-) -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ "gmail" domain blocked because of excessive spam. Use another domain or send PM.
From: Archimedes' Lever on 13 Jun 2010 17:47
On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 16:30:46 -0500, "krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" <krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz> wrote: >On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:08:03 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> wrote: > >>Archimedes' Lever wrote: >>> On Sun, 13 Jun 2010 13:24:21 -0700, Joerg <invalid(a)invalid.invalid> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Oh, and how do you suppose you get an "original design" into production >>>> without an ECO? >>> >>> >>> You must also be an acronymical retard as well. >>> >>> There is a difference between a design release and a change order of an >>> existing design. >>> >> >>So you guys release new designs without due ECO process? I sure hope you >>don't design anything that can harm people. > >AlwaysWrong doesn't design anything, so no he doesn't release ECOs. Everyone >else here who does, uses an ECO process, certainly. The ECO process is for changes made to a design, not the original document. |