Finite Relativism (FR) book
in [Relativity]
|
From: PD on 16 Dec 2009 16:49 On Dec 16, 3:45 pm, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: > PD wrote: > > > How's that working for you? > > I asked other professors and I told computer scientists. And did you change any of them? You said you were going to change the world around me. Asking and telling doesn't effect change, does it?
From: Bill Snyder on 16 Dec 2009 16:50 On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 13:49:10 -0800 (PST), PD <thedraperfamily(a)gmail.com> wrote: >On Dec 16, 3:45 pm, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: >> PD wrote: >> >> > How's that working for you? >> >> I asked other professors and I told computer scientists. > >And did you change any of them? >You said you were going to change the world around me. >Asking and telling doesn't effect change, does it? A good laugh can often change someone's attitude for the better, at least temporarily. -- Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank]
From: Phil Bouchard on 16 Dec 2009 16:50 Greg Neill wrote: > > Who said the solar system would be local? See? > > Everything's a special case with your theory. > Move to the Moon and you need new fudge factors. > Move to an orbit about Jupiter and there's more. > Heck, move your satellite to the opposite side of > the Earth and you need to redo all your calculations. > > In sum, your theory is useless as a general tool. No, you need one scaling factor for the whole solar system and all its neighboring ones. This enough for the next 5,000 years of space exploration. With GR you need an almanac being preinstalled for every planet you are planning to visit within the solar system to correct its time dilation predictions. [...]
From: Phil Bouchard on 16 Dec 2009 16:53 PD wrote: > > And did you change any of them? > You said you were going to change the world around me. > Asking and telling doesn't effect change, does it? I am referring to the best people in the world so good luck.
From: Greg Neill on 16 Dec 2009 17:29
Phil Bouchard wrote: > Greg Neill wrote: >> >> Who said the solar system would be local? See? >> >> Everything's a special case with your theory. >> Move to the Moon and you need new fudge factors. >> Move to an orbit about Jupiter and there's more. >> Heck, move your satellite to the opposite side of >> the Earth and you need to redo all your calculations. >> >> In sum, your theory is useless as a general tool. > > No, you need one scaling factor for the whole solar system and all its > neighboring ones. This enough for the next 5,000 years of space > exploration. > > With GR you need an almanac being preinstalled for every planet you are > planning to visit within the solar system to correct its time dilation > predictions. So, are you claiming that you need not change any of your fudge factors if you want to calculate the clock time dilation for a probe orbiting Ganymede, a moon of Jupiter? Shall we have a go at that? First you supply your mathematical formula, written clearly and completely, with all constants given and variables explained. Then supply your predicted dilation value. We will then compare with what General Relativity says. By the way, General Relativity requires only the masses of the nearby objects to work to spec.; The observer enters the particular conditions (velocity, position) and out pops the accurate result. FR seems to require the originating author to make multiple guesses, corrections, retractions, resubmissions, recorrections, appologies, and recalculations while waving a witch doctor's rattle over soooper-sekrit black box executable only kluge of code. |