Finite Relativism (FR) book
in [Relativity]
|
From: BradGuth on 16 Dec 2009 17:39 On Dec 15, 11:48 pm, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: > BradGuth wrote: > > > Notice how all these Zionist Nazi brown-nosed clowns have come out to > > play. > > > (watch your back) > > This is sick. They can fight computer scientists, engineers, > mathematicians and non-Nazi physicists as long as they want; I wish them > good luck. How's your body armor holding up? With this many mainstream cannons aimed at the back of your head, perhaps it's just a matter of time. Start to worry if they switch to IEDs, because those nasty things will take out everything for at least 100 meters in all directions. ~ BG
From: Phil Bouchard on 16 Dec 2009 17:42 Greg Neill wrote: > > So, are you claiming that you need not change any of your > fudge factors if you want to calculate the clock time > dilation for a probe orbiting Ganymede, a moon of Jupiter? Not at all. > Shall we have a go at that? First you supply your mathematical > formula, written clearly and completely, with all constants > given and variables explained. Then supply your predicted > dilation value. We will then compare with what General > Relativity says. http://www.fornux.com/personal/philippe/fr/fr-sci_physics.pdf > By the way, General Relativity requires only the masses of the > nearby objects to work to spec.; The observer enters the > particular conditions (velocity, position) and out pops the > accurate result. All it can handle are the GPS predictions and it still relies on an almanac. [...]
From: BradGuth on 16 Dec 2009 17:45 On Dec 16, 1:53 pm, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: > PD wrote: > > > And did you change any of them? > > You said you were going to change the world around me. > > Asking and telling doesn't effect change, does it? > > I am referring to the best people in the world so good luck. If need be, they'll even trash Einstein if it'll get rid of you. ~ BG
From: Phil Bouchard on 16 Dec 2009 18:00 BradGuth wrote: > > If need be, they'll even trash Einstein if it'll get rid of you. Thanks for the warning; I'm outta here.
From: Greg Neill on 16 Dec 2009 18:01
Phil Bouchard wrote: > Greg Neill wrote: > >> By the way, General Relativity requires only the masses of the >> nearby objects to work to spec.; The observer enters the >> particular conditions (velocity, position) and out pops the >> accurate result. > > All it can handle are the GPS predictions and it still relies on an almanac. You are ignorant or lying. Choose one. |