From: Phil Bouchard on 16 Dec 2009 02:17 Greg Neill wrote: > Phil Bouchard wrote: >> In fact z = 0. > > What if the square is in the z-x plane? Or the > z=y plane? Or rotated and located at random in > space? > > Face it phil, you're out of your depth. I forgot z = 0 in my spherical calculations, that's all. I think you should go back to the bars downtown Montreal, they open until 3:00 AM.
From: Phil Bouchard on 16 Dec 2009 02:28 Greg Neill wrote: > > This from a person who wants to teach new physics? Well it took me more than 2 weeks explaining irrational numbers are not acceptable results when all of the input consists or rational numbers. I don't see how you can understand the 2 simple postulates of FR. > What exactly are you here for, Phil? With all means, to tell you the truth and then leave.
From: Phil Bouchard on 16 Dec 2009 02:48 BradGuth wrote: > > Notice how all these Zionist Nazi brown-nosed clowns have come out to > play. > > (watch your back) This is sick. They can fight computer scientists, engineers, mathematicians and non-Nazi physicists as long as they want; I wish them good luck.
From: Inertial on 16 Dec 2009 02:59 "Phil Bouchard" <phil(a)fornux.com> wrote in message news:4b288c31(a)news.x-privat.org... > Greg Neill wrote: >> >> This from a person who wants to teach new physics? > > Well it took me more than 2 weeks explaining irrational numbers are not > acceptable results when all of the input consists or rational numbers. Nonsense. sqrt takes a rational as an input and can happily get irrational as output. > I don't see how you can understand the 2 simple postulates of FR. I have asked you questions about them before as they are very vague and not well defined
From: Phil Bouchard on 16 Dec 2009 02:59
BradGuth wrote: > On Dec 15, 10:28 am, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote: >> >> NB: "Sam Wormley" was removed by request and so is "Doug" for having no >> last name. > > You must be wearing bullet proof full-body armor. Well I need relying on teaching self-discipline now. |