From: Phil Bouchard on
Greg Neill wrote:
> Phil Bouchard wrote:
>> In fact z = 0.
>
> What if the square is in the z-x plane? Or the
> z=y plane? Or rotated and located at random in
> space?
>
> Face it phil, you're out of your depth.

I forgot z = 0 in my spherical calculations, that's all.

I think you should go back to the bars downtown Montreal, they open
until 3:00 AM.
From: Phil Bouchard on
Greg Neill wrote:
>
> This from a person who wants to teach new physics?

Well it took me more than 2 weeks explaining irrational numbers are not
acceptable results when all of the input consists or rational numbers.

I don't see how you can understand the 2 simple postulates of FR.

> What exactly are you here for, Phil?

With all means, to tell you the truth and then leave.
From: Phil Bouchard on
BradGuth wrote:
>
> Notice how all these Zionist Nazi brown-nosed clowns have come out to
> play.
>
> (watch your back)

This is sick. They can fight computer scientists, engineers,
mathematicians and non-Nazi physicists as long as they want; I wish them
good luck.
From: Inertial on
"Phil Bouchard" <phil(a)fornux.com> wrote in message
news:4b288c31(a)news.x-privat.org...
> Greg Neill wrote:
>>
>> This from a person who wants to teach new physics?
>
> Well it took me more than 2 weeks explaining irrational numbers are not
> acceptable results when all of the input consists or rational numbers.

Nonsense. sqrt takes a rational as an input and can happily get irrational
as output.

> I don't see how you can understand the 2 simple postulates of FR.

I have asked you questions about them before as they are very vague and not
well defined


From: Phil Bouchard on
BradGuth wrote:
> On Dec 15, 10:28 am, Phil Bouchard <p...(a)fornux.com> wrote:
>>
>> NB: "Sam Wormley" was removed by request and so is "Doug" for having no
>> last name.
>
> You must be wearing bullet proof full-body armor.

Well I need relying on teaching self-discipline now.