Finite Relativism (FR) book
in [Relativity]
|
From: Phil Bouchard on 15 Dec 2009 15:32 Phil Bouchard wrote: [...] > Perhaps you prefer paying artists and politicians, then go. Here's a good book for you: http://amzn.com/0061939897
From: Sam Wormley on 15 Dec 2009 15:34 On 12/15/09 1:54 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: >> On 12/15/09 1:46 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: >> >> Christ Phil--learn some mathematics! >> Why do you bloody your nose here? > > Sam, I removed your name as requested so please remove your comment on > Amazon: > http://amzn.com/1441453105 It's a book review, not a comment. You sent me a copy of your book to review and I reviewed your book. Customer Reviews Finite Relativism And Dark Matter Disproof: General Relativity Reegineered http://www.amazon.com/Finite-Relativism-Dark-Matter-Disproof/dp/1441453105/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top 'My name appears in the Acknowledgments of this book, therefore, I should contribute a review. "Finite Relativism And Dark Matter Disproof" is an attempt by the author to disprove special relativity, Dark Matter and to solve many of what the author perceives as "dilemmas" such as singularities, black hole behaviors and natural worm holes. Unfortunately, the author demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of special or general relativity or the underlying mathematics of either theory. The author confuses the concepts of acceleration and velocity in the abstract and goes downhill from there. One can open the book to almost any page and find the conceptual arguments and calculations wrong. In a section on GPS, the author plots gravitational time dilation as a function of altitude which is totally contradicted by general relativity predictions and observations of time dilation in earth satellite clocks. I cannot recommend this book to anyone, even as an example of how not to write about science. -- Sam Wormley, Adj. Prof. Astronomy'
From: Sam Wormley on 15 Dec 2009 15:40 On 12/15/09 2:30 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: >> >> Hey Phil--What institute is it you claim to have a mathematics >> degree from? >> http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IrrationalNumber.html > > "Irrational numbers have decimal expansions that neither terminate nor > become periodic." "An irrational number is a number that cannot be expressed as a fraction p/q for any integers p and q. > > Sam, I removed your name as requested so please remove your comment on > Amazon: > http://amzn.com/1441453105 It's a book review, not a comment. You sent me a copy of your book to review and I reviewed your book. Customer Reviews Finite Relativism And Dark Matter Disproof: General Relativity Reegineered http://www.amazon.com/Finite-Relativism-Dark-Matter-Disproof/dp/1441453105/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top 'My name appears in the Acknowledgments of this book, therefore, I should contribute a review. "Finite Relativism And Dark Matter Disproof" is an attempt by the author to disprove special relativity, Dark Matter and to solve many of what the author perceives as "dilemmas" such as singularities, black hole behaviors and natural worm holes. Unfortunately, the author demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of special or general relativity or the underlying mathematics of either theory. The author confuses the concepts of acceleration and velocity in the abstract and goes downhill from there. One can open the book to almost any page and find the conceptual arguments and calculations wrong. In a section on GPS, the author plots gravitational time dilation as a function of altitude which is totally contradicted by general relativity predictions and observations of time dilation in earth satellite clocks. I cannot recommend this book to anyone, even as an example of how not to write about science. -- Sam Wormley, Adj. Prof. Astronomy'
From: Phil Bouchard on 15 Dec 2009 15:48 dlzc wrote: > > You lie. Your lies are on record. Says a lot about how stupid you > think the rest of humanity is. It is unfortunate Doug used an alias because I do acknowledge him. > Any further posts by you will be reported by me as spam. You are > selling product, in violation of the charter. Science contributions aren't illegal.
From: Phil Bouchard on 15 Dec 2009 16:00
Sam Wormley wrote: [...] > 'My name appears in the Acknowledgments of this book, therefore, I should > contribute a review. Well I just removed it, so please remove the comment. |