Finite Relativism (FR) book
in [Relativity]
|
From: eric gisse on 15 Dec 2009 16:11 Phil Bouchard wrote: > eric gisse wrote: >> Phil Bouchard wrote: >> >> Phil, the thing that's so great about you is that you are stupid enough >> to take simple terminology literally. A normal student just sees >> 'irrational numbers' or 'imaginary numbers' and understands them to be a >> name, but you are special. You think they are _actually_ imaginary of >> _actually_ irrational. > > An irrational number will never be the right answer. Really, Phil? What's the square root of two?
From: eric gisse on 15 Dec 2009 16:11 Phil Bouchard wrote: > Sam Wormley wrote: > > [...] > >> 'My name appears in the Acknowledgments of this book, therefore, I >> should >> contribute a review. > > Well I just removed it, so please remove the comment. Sam is under no obligation to remove his review.
From: Phil Bouchard on 15 Dec 2009 16:15 eric gisse wrote: > > Sam is under no obligation to remove his review. Let Sam talk for himself.
From: Greg Neill on 15 Dec 2009 16:15 Phil Bouchard wrote: > The latest version of the book has many textual corrections, but the > core mathematics remain the same: ....brought to you from the guy who thinks that squares don't have diagonals, and can't determine the distance between points.
From: Greg Neill on 15 Dec 2009 16:18
Phil Bouchard wrote: > dlzc wrote: >> >> You lie. Your lies are on record. Says a lot about how stupid you >> think the rest of humanity is. > > It is unfortunate Doug used an alias because I do acknowledge him. > >> Any further posts by you will be reported by me as spam. You are >> selling product, in violation of the charter. > > Science contributions aren't illegal. You're not contributing, you're selling. |