Five Small Problems with AGW science.
in [Physics]
|
From: Benj on 18 Feb 2010 01:04 On Feb 17, 6:38 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote: > On Feb 17, 12:22 pm, Marvin the Martian <mar...(a)ontomars.org> wrote: > > 1) There isn't any warming. Even Jones admits this. > > There'd better be warming. Else it would be too cold for life. And > who is Jones? He means caused by CO2. Idiot. > > 2) CO2 doesn't cause the greenhouse effect. Water vapor does. > > Both do. But CO2 doesn't cycle into and out of the atmosphere as > quickly. Hence the potential problem. Ah, you must be a liberal since the word "quantity" has no meaning in your life. "If just one life is saved", right? But the effect of CO2 is so miniscule and the man-made portion of that even smaller that hence the "no-problem". > > 3) We didn't put the CO2 into the atmosphere. A warmer ocean did that. > > We certainly put some of it into the atmosphere. What do you think is > a by product of so many chemical reactions? Again. Do you have any idea what the word "quantity" means? If we immediately totally STOPPED all transportation the amount of CO2 into the atmosphere would be reduced so little as to be laughable! And doing such would totally destroy civilization! Do you have any idea what the word "idiot" means? Just how much money do you plan to rake in at the expense of planetary civilization? > > 4) AGW science isn't science, it's bullshit and leftist propaganda. > > It's still an open question. Apparently one that's too complicated > for your silly litte brain. But not too complex for your massive intellect. Which is why you understand the fraud and intend to in on the gravy train! > > 5) If there was warming, it wouldn't be bad, it would be good. > > So much for silly sophomoric statements. I take it you must be living in the Southern hemisphere these days. All we need to do is look out the window to see who is sophomoric here.
From: Benj on 18 Feb 2010 01:06 On Feb 17, 10:14 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > You are uninformed on the tax cut issues. Obviously you are completely informed as we would expect of any insider, but you just choose not to pass on any truthful information.
From: Benj on 18 Feb 2010 01:07 On Feb 17, 10:22 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Marvin, I can't believe how unobjective you are. I wonder when > you will wake up. Sam, tell us how you feel about global warming. We would really like to know.
From: matt_sykes on 18 Feb 2010 08:03 On 17 Feb, 18:22, Marvin the Martian <mar...(a)ontomars.org> wrote: > Scientific experts like Al Gore and Barack Obama assure us that the > science of AGW is settled; and it is except for a few minor details, > those details being: > > 1) There isn't any warming. Even Jones admits this. There is, in some places, and there isnt elsewhere. No one knows why. > 2) CO2 doesn't cause the greenhouse effect. Water vapor does. Many gasses are GH gases, CO2 amongst them, but the dont cause warming. Thy average out the temperature extremes by acting as a heat sink. Without them we would be as hot and as cold as the moon. > 3) We didn't put the CO2 into the atmosphere. A warmer ocean did that. No, we are propducing CO2, which is good. It means a more benevolent climate and better plant growth. > 4) AGW science isn't science, it's bullshit and leftist propaganda. True. > 5) If there was warming, it wouldn't be bad, it would be good. True. > > Gawd, Humans are a gullible species. I can't believe you fell for AGW.
From: erschroedinger on 18 Feb 2010 09:11
On Feb 17, 9:45 pm, Marvin the Martian <mar...(a)ontomars.org> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 13:32:14 -0600, Baron wrote: > > "Marvin the Martian" <mar...(a)ontomars.org> wrote in message > >news:zemdnfpQkPlRuOHWnZ2dnUVZ_qWdnZ2d(a)giganews.com... > >> Scientific experts like Al Gore and Barack Obama assure us that the > >> science of AGW is settled; and it is except for a few minor details, > >> those details being: > > >> 1) There isn't any warming. Even Jones admits this. 2) CO2 doesn't > >> cause the greenhouse effect. Water vapor does. 3) We didn't put the CO2 > >> into the atmosphere. A warmer ocean did that. 4) AGW science isn't > >> science, it's bullshit and leftist propaganda. 5) If there was warming, > >> it wouldn't be bad, it would be good. > > >> Gawd, Humans are a gullible species. I can't believe you fell for AGW. > > > They elected Obama, inexperienced extreme leftist socialist. Yep, at > > least 53% of the voters in USA are stupid morons. > > I don't want to get into politics, but Obama promised them all kinds of > money in the form of "tax credits" for people who don't pay taxes, Hey, look in the mirror and say "Idiot." > telling "Joe the Plumber" that he was going to redistribute the wealth. > > So far, only bankers, Car Executives, the UAW, Goldman Sachs, and AIG > have gotten anything, and they're getting trillions of dollars; what > amounts to almost 7 k$ from each man, woman and child in the US. All the > 50% of the folks who were going to get tax credits and don't pay taxes > got is a promise to be taxed into poverty with the "Carbon Credits" until > coal states "go bankrupt" and electricity is too expensive to use. > > Instead of getting someone else's hard earned bucks, the average Obama > voter can look forward to paying through the nose for gasoline and > heating oil, being unemployed, and freezing to death while being told > that Global Warming will kill us all. The average Obama voter isn't a racist, bigoted neoNazi either. |