Five Small Problems with AGW science.
in [Physics]
|
From: Sam Wormley on 20 Feb 2010 00:43 On 2/19/10 11:37 PM, Last Post wrote: > � The issue is really irrelevant. > Nobody can control the wind > Nobody can control the rain or snow > Nobody (collectively) can control climate. > Global temps are within natural variations > Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation > Get used to it!! Many of your arguments are addressed and rebutted in this document: http://www.swissre.com/resources/2225fb0040c36b1fa49cbfb02e99dba1-Factsheet_Climate_sceptic.pdf Give it a read and follow the references.
From: Chris L Peterson on 20 Feb 2010 00:46 On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 21:37:13 -0800 (PST), Last Post <last_post(a)primus.ca> wrote: > | In real science the burden of proof is always > | on the proposer, never on the sceptics. A demonstration that you don't understand the most basic nature of science. The burden of proof is on a proposer until a consensus is achieved. Once a theory becomes widely accepted, however, the burden of proof is on those who believe the theory is wrong. And contrary to your assertion, the consensus that AGW is a real phenomenon is extremely broad. > So far > | neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided one > | iota of valid data for global warming nor have > | they provided data that climate change is being > | effected by commerce and industry, and not by > | natural phenomena This statement is proof positive that you are ignorant, and not qualified to have an opinion on the matter. _________________________________________________ Chris L Peterson Cloudbait Observatory http://www.cloudbait.com
From: Last Post on 20 Feb 2010 01:04 On Feb 20, 12:42 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On 2/19/10 11:37 PM, Last Post wrote: > > > > > ø The issue is really irrelevant. > > Nobody can control the wind > > Nobody can control the rain or snow > > Nobody (collectively) can control climate. > > Global temps are within natural variations > > Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation > > Get used to it!! > > Many of your arguments are addressed and rebutted in this > document: ø Can you make the wind to blow? ø Can you make the rain to fall? ø If you can not do either, how do you expect to control the climate? You are an arrogant fool, fascist too. But none of that cuts any ice here. One roll of toilet paper is worth more than all of the IPCC documents. At least it is useful.
From: Sam Wormley on 20 Feb 2010 01:12 On 2/20/10 12:04 AM, Last Post wrote: > On Feb 20, 12:42 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> On 2/19/10 11:37 PM, Last Post wrote: >> >> >> >>> � The issue is really irrelevant. >>> Nobody can control the wind >>> Nobody can control the rain or snow >>> Nobody (collectively) can control climate. >>> Global temps are within natural variations >>> Oceans heating are a prelude to glaciation >>> Get used to it!! >> >> Many of your arguments are addressed and rebutted in this >> document: > > � Can you make the wind to blow? > � Can you make the rain to fall? > > � If you can not do either, how do you expect to > control the climate? You are an arrogant fool, > fascist too. But none of that cuts any ice here. > One roll of toilet paper is worth more than all > of the IPCC documents. At least it is useful. <smiling> Use wind instead of coal!
From: Sam Wormley on 20 Feb 2010 01:16
On 2/20/10 12:04 AM, Last Post wrote: > On Feb 20, 12:42 am, Sam Wormley<sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Many of your arguments are addressed and rebutted in this >> document: http://www.swissre.com/resources/2225fb0040c36b1fa49cbfb02e99dba1-Factsheet_Climate_sceptic.pdf > > � Can you make the wind to blow? > � Can you make the rain to fall? > > � If you can not do either, how do you expect to > control the climate? You are an arrogant fool, > fascist too. But none of that cuts any ice here. > One roll of toilet paper is worth more than all > of the IPCC documents. At least it is useful. You didn't read it did you? |