For those who don't believe E=mc^2
in [Physics]
|
Prev: get your nookies: Belarus to repopulate Chernobyl Exclusion Zone
Next: 2010 Individual Taxation With H&R Block Taxcut 4e 2010 Pratt Kulsrud Test bank
From: Edward Green on 9 Aug 2010 21:14 On Aug 9, 8:33 am, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote: > On Aug 9, 1:35 am, Edward Green <spamspamsp...(a)netzero.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 7, 1:12 am, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > > > > .... ahahahaha... ahahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA... > > > I hate to rain on your undying Einstein-love-parade here, > > > which Zios promote, but about which rational Jews say: > > > "Oye weh"..."Goyim, Goyim, Goyim"... "Go figure".... > > > > Mark L. Fergerson"n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wroteL > > > > Excognito <stuartbr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 65th Birthday of Nuclear Warfare > > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy> > > > > Einstein Dingleberry Mark L. Fergerson wrote: > > > [about "For those who don't believe E=mc^2"]: > > > Good one; dead silence from the anti-Einstein fanatics. > > > > hanson wrote: > > > > Better one; because the only fanartic is you, Fergie. > > > There is good reason for the silence because loud- > > > mouthing Einstein Dingleberries ... > > > There was a real professor Dingle, and he was an English anti- > > relativist. So the choice of sobriquet is ironic. > > http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dingleberry Wow. Thanks for sharing that definition. I think. > Note: Dingle was a relativist who became disillusioned with SRT - or > at least, with Einstein's formulations of the same. > He first wrote a popular textbook on relativity theory as well as a > contribution to the Encycl. Brittanica, but later rejected > "relativity" as formulated by Einstein. He must have become senile. > -http://www.archive.org/details/relativityforal00dinggoog > -http://blog.hasslberger.com/Dingle_SCIENCE_at_the_Crossroads.pdf > > Harald
From: Edward Green on 9 Aug 2010 21:19 On Aug 9, 9:01 pm, Edward Green <spamspamsp...(a)netzero.com> wrote: > On Aug 8, 6:54 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 7, 11:13 am, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > > > > Mark L. Fergerson wrote: > > > I'm glad I turned my killfile off for a moment. > > > > hans' son wrote: > > > > AHAHAHA... Yeah right!... Sure, sure, you did... ahahaha... > > > Let me guess; you're one of those who think Google Groups users have > > no killfile options. > > >http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html > > You have unleashed a demon of great power. Let's see... whom shall I > killfile first? I see a problem right away. Shall I killfile the "good" people who carry on extended conversations with the "bad" people? They generate fully half the noise. Suppressing one side of the conversation doesn't really achieve that much.
From: Androcles on 9 Aug 2010 21:48 "Edward Green" <spamspamspam3(a)netzero.com> wrote in message news:3a465648-e904-4a9e-9ea8-aa527f9a8d99(a)x21g2000yqa.googlegroups.com... On Aug 9, 8:33 am, harald <h...(a)swissonline.ch> wrote: > On Aug 9, 1:35 am, Edward Green <spamspamsp...(a)netzero.com> wrote: > > > > > On Aug 7, 1:12 am, "hanson" <han...(a)quick.net> wrote: > > > > .... ahahahaha... ahahahahahaha... AHAHAHAHAHA... > > > I hate to rain on your undying Einstein-love-parade here, > > > which Zios promote, but about which rational Jews say: > > > "Oye weh"..."Goyim, Goyim, Goyim"... "Go figure".... > > > > Mark L. Fergerson"n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wroteL > > > > Excognito <stuartbr...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > 65th Birthday of Nuclear Warfare > > > <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Boy> > > > > Einstein Dingleberry Mark L. Fergerson wrote: > > > [about "For those who don't believe E=mc^2"]: > > > Good one; dead silence from the anti-Einstein fanatics. > > > > hanson wrote: > > > > Better one; because the only fanartic is you, Fergie. > > > There is good reason for the silence because loud- > > > mouthing Einstein Dingleberries ... > > > There was a real professor Dingle, and he was an English anti- > > relativist. So the choice of sobriquet is ironic. > > http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/dingleberry Green: Wow. Thanks for sharing that definition. ================================ If the cap fits, wear it. Green: I think. ==================================== Do you have any empirical evidence to support that absurd assertion? > Note: Dingle was a relativist who became disillusioned with SRT - or > at least, with Einstein's formulations of the same. > He first wrote a popular textbook on relativity theory as well as a > contribution to the Encycl. Brittanica, but later rejected > "relativity" as formulated by Einstein. Green: He must have become senile. ========================== You must have remained a cretin.
From: nuny on 10 Aug 2010 07:07 On Aug 9, 6:19 pm, Edward Green <spamspamsp...(a)netzero.com> wrote: > On Aug 9, 9:01 pm, Edward Green <spamspamsp...(a)netzero.com> wrote: > > > On Aug 8, 6:54 pm, "n...(a)bid.nes" <alien8...(a)gmail.com> wrote: (snip) > > > Let me guess; you're one of those who think Google Groups users have > > > no killfile options. > > > >http://www.penney.org/ggkiller.html > > > You have unleashed a demon of great power. Granted, it only works in Firefox under Greasemonkey, but the installation and setup are relatively (!) painless. > >Let's see... whom shall I killfile first? I have some suggestions, but YMMV. > I see a problem right away. Shall I killfile the "good" people who > carry on extended conversations with the "bad" people? They generate > fully half the noise. Suppressing one side of the conversation > doesn't really achieve that much. Sometimes I read the "good" half of such conversations for the entertainment value. Also occasionally I learn something. ;>) Mark L. Fergerson
From: spudnik on 10 Aug 2010 13:41
teeheehanson, what is your problem with relativity?... I could see from the outset of Dingle's book, that he is in a quandary over "which clock is slower," and that is a very simple thing, the same as the strawman paradox of the twins. thus: and, it's simpler to say that, it is rational, iff the decimal part (after a finite number of places) repeats, *including* a tail of zeroes or nines. thus: you only have your toe in it. the surface of the sphere is pi*d*d, and it is four times the surface of the great circle -- a thing that Bucky apparently didn't know, oddly enough. it is pretty laughable, that you'd think that you are dysproving F"L"T, because it is clear from the available stuff that it was the key to his method (along with the fact that he basically created numbertheorie, dood .-) --les ducs d'Enron! http://tarpley.net --Light, A History! http://wlym.com |