Free Energy
in [Physics]
|
From: Tom on 27 Feb 2006 16:09 "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote in message news:L%EMf.2714$8d1.830(a)read1.cgocable.net... > > "Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote >> Where did you get the bizarre notion that I'm a Republican? Do you have >> this idea that only Republicans think you're a kook? > > If it quacks like a chicken, You're one strange kook, buddy.
From: Tom on 27 Feb 2006 16:09 "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote in message news:u0FMf.1776$d9.1264(a)read2.cgocable.net... > > >> "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote in message >> > I think toilet turtles are what you had for lunch. > > "Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote >> My, I'm so impressed with your logic. > > On the other hand, you don't impress any of us at all. "Us?" How many people are living in your skull?
From: Archangel on 28 Feb 2006 05:34 "Martin Swain" <martin_swain(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:44034463.5000605(a)hotmail.com... > Scott Nudds wrote: >> . >> "Martin Swain" wrote >> >>>Thank you. I still don't like you. If you see me coming you'd better >>>duck. >> >> >> Whatcha gonna do, slap me silly? > > Not what I had in mind at all. Happens to you often does it? > >> >> Your spectacular loss here should teach you to avoid exposing your >> vast >> ignorance to public view. >> > > What loss? I still believe you're wrong. However now I think you're just > too impressed with yourself to see it. I may not be up to speed on > the details of all the jargon you've pulled out of your bum, but it > seems to me the balance of things has come down on my side. > > You can continue to bombast away, I'm not convinced and won't be. > > I can be convinced, but not with your tactics, loser. Notice the subtle diversion from matters of fact to matters of opinion. A
From: Scott Nudds on 28 Feb 2006 13:41 "Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:CL- > "Us?" How many people are living in your skull? Just one, but that's still several orders of magnitude more than you. Unlike you Tom, we don't need to post a seemingly endless stream of lies to support our claims. We have science on our side.
From: Scott Nudds on 28 Feb 2006 14:13
"Martin Swain" wrote > What loss? I still believe you're wrong. However now I think you're just > too impressed with yourself to see it. I'm sorry if the big words confused you Martin. But seriously, they weren't very big at all. "Martin Swain" wrote > I may not be up to speed on > the details of all the jargon you've pulled out of your bum, but it > seems to me the balance of things has come down on my side. Snicker, You conclude this after finding yourself incapable of reading what was written ay? Do you also substitute the ritual reading of the chicken bones left on your dinner plate in place of a newspaper? Bahahahahahahahahahah You are too stupid to even appreciate how stupid you are Martin. Truly pathetic. |