Free Energy
in [Physics]
|
From: Bill Ward on 25 Feb 2006 14:05 On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 09:51:49 GMT, "Archangel" <Archangel(a)nulldev.com> wrote: > >"Bill Ward" <bwardREMOVE(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote in message >news:44000af6.43954547(a)localhost... <snip prior posts> >> Looking backward, at some point it seems to me there will >> always be an unanswerable question, where science must end >> and faith begin. Right now the unanswerable question seems >> to be, "Why are we here?" > > >well most of us with an IQ of more than 100 are here to laugh at Tom. > >A > Whatever keeps your mind occupied. He doesn't seem very concerned about it.
From: Meltdarok on 25 Feb 2006 18:49 "Bill Ward" <bwardREMOVE(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote in message news:44000af6.43954547(a)localhost... > > Looking backward, at some point it seems to me there will > always be an unanswerable question, where science must end > and faith begin. Right now the unanswerable question seems > to be, "Why are we here?" > > In the beginning, God was sitting around, being cool, being God, and He was all there was. Then one day, (well for God, it is always now, but anyways) God decided to have a thought. So He thought His thought. After He thought His thought, He felt very sad. And being God, when He was sad, He was perfectly sad. So He decided to speak, and when He spoke He said, "B*O*R*I*N*G !" And when God was bored, He was perfectly bored. Of course being God, He already knew what to do. He looked around, and there was only Him, for He is everything. There was silence and blankness. So He spoke again, and thus He said, "Naw, somethin's got to move." And it did. Today we call it the universe. This universe is, yet is not, God. It is God, since God is all that there is. Yet, it is not God, because He created it. Then God said, "I'll create Me a slammin' system." And the next thing you knew, here we are. And every now and then, (that is to us, since with God it is always now) God says to us, "Yo Dudes, what's happenin'? I can help you. It is good." And when God says something is good, it is perfectly good. -- meltdarok http://hometown.aol.com/meltdarok/
From: Scott Nudds on 25 Feb 2006 20:05 "QCD Apprentice" wrote > Not mass, energy. Yes.. Yes.. A silly brain fart on my part. Correcting... > > I see no reason why the total energy must be constant, and I see no reason > > to arbitrarily assign as negative the energy of the infalling particle. > > The process - if it occurrs at all, probably causes the black hole mass to > > increas at the expense of lower ZPE density around it's surface. "QCD Apprentice" wrote > > Because Casimir is not a field that originates from an elementary > > particle, but a force that originates from space itself. "QCD Apprentice" wrote > No, the Casimir force most certainly is the result of having > elementary particles. No, it clearly isn't. It's a result of uncertainty in the energy momentum tensor of free space. > The entire original argument was based upon virtual photons and the boundary > conditions imposed on two flat plates. That's true. But other methods of arriving at the same conclusions exist that don't need to have the vacuum field quantized at all.
From: Scott Nudds on 25 Feb 2006 20:09 "Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote > What you borrow has to be given back. So it's not free. You said free. > You didn't say borrowed. When do the Republicans plan to pay back the 8.2 trillion they have borrowed in their effort to impoverish the AmeriKKKan people?
From: Scott Nudds on 25 Feb 2006 20:09
You are a spectacularly energetic public Liar Tom. |