Free Energy
in [Physics]
|
From: Archangel on 25 Feb 2006 00:53 "Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:kvednZZcktcBU2LeRVn-ug(a)comcast.com... > > "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote in message > news:gvNLf.150$8d1.82(a)read1.cgocable.net... >> . >> "Martin Swain" wrote >>> Thank you. I still don't like you. If you see me coming you'd better >>> duck. >> >> Whatcha gonna do, slap me silly? > > Too late. You're already silly. Ah, that will mean Tom didn't understand the science. After all, he has a 3rd rate BSc from a 5th rate college and he couldn't even complete his Masters at the aforesaid shonky college for the obvious reason that he is brainless. A
From: Archangel on 25 Feb 2006 00:54 "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote in message news:TCQLf.1081$d9.239(a)read2.cgocable.net... > >> "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote in message >> > Whatcha gonna do, slap me silly? > >> "Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote >> Too late. You're already silly. > > What's the point of being serious with a liar like you? > you think he is a massive liar too? So do most people in here. A
From: Archangel on 25 Feb 2006 01:02 "Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:DZWdnQaQ2LOITWLenZ2dnUVZ_tqdnZ2d(a)comcast.com... > > "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote in message > news:3KLLf.161$d9.46(a)read2.cgocable.net... >> >> "Tom" wrote >>> Yes, I know. It just doesn't make sense to you. >> >> Little of what you say does, > > So it seems. it does indeed. Frequently. >> as it is so spectacularly stupid, > > Heh. You'd think the stupid things would be the easiest to understand. > It's the very complex and subtle things that would be hardest. But I > guess that's not true for you. Stupid things are not easy to understand Tom. Because they are stupid. Still, it is comforting to hear you say you understand stupid things easily, it shows great promise. All you need to do nw is start to understand some non-stupid things. Practice hard now... >> "Tom" wrote >>> Conundrums amuse me. >> >> Like all forms of spinning objects no doubt. > > To some degree, yes. They are bright and shiny and look pwetty. > "Do these balloons blow up into funny shapes?" > "No... Unless round is funny." > >> "Tom" wrote >>> Some people think "smart" means "agrees with me". >> >> Some stupid people think smart means agrees with Bush. > > Yep. And some stupid people don't. Agreement or disagreement with Bush > is not a definitive test of intelligence. It seems you dont agree that smart means agreeing with Bush. So you use that to prove that some stupid people dont believe it. OK. Well done. HARHARHARHARHARHAR A
From: Archangel on 25 Feb 2006 01:03 "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote in message news:FWJLf.125$8d1.34(a)read1.cgocable.net... > > "Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote >> You're *still* claiming, even in the face of direct evidence to the >> contrary, that you never wrote that? >> >> Your continued pretence that you haven't been thoroughly busted is just >> appalling. Just who do you think you're fooling? > > You are a spectacularly energetic public Liar Tom. > > It is not often that I come across someone as prolific as you in this > field. > > Are you a self taught Liar Tom? Or were you trained? Practice makes perfect. A
From: Archangel on 25 Feb 2006 01:03
"Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote in message news:AZadnRKUsoOk5mLenZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d(a)comcast.com... > > "Scott Nudds" <void(a)void.com> wrote in message > news:FWJLf.125$8d1.34(a)read1.cgocable.net... >> >> "Tom" <askpermission(a)comcast.net> wrote >>> You're *still* claiming, even in the face of direct evidence to the >>> contrary, that you never wrote that? >>> >>> Your continued pretence that you haven't been thoroughly busted is just >>> appalling. Just who do you think you're fooling? >> >> You are a spectacularly energetic public Liar Tom. > > Hey, it's another Archie sock-puppet! > > Decoded: There cant be 2 people who think I am a stupid liar. Can there? Nah! A |